- Joined
- Sep 19, 2015
- Messages
- 28 (0.01/day)
Processor | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI H97 PC Mate |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Red Devil RX 480 8GB |
Case | be quiet! Silent Base 800 Orange Window |
Server first. That's it
Processor | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI H97 PC Mate |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Red Devil RX 480 8GB |
Case | be quiet! Silent Base 800 Orange Window |
System Name | Silicon Graphics O2 |
---|---|
Processor | R5000 / 180MHz |
Cooling | noisy fan |
Memory | 384 MB |
Storage | 4 GB |
Case | the one with the old logo and proud of it ;) |
Software | IRIX 6.5 |
What about testing CPUs at their actual stock settings, aka DDR5-5600 at JEDEC timings in the case of Ryzen 9000?It is not slow, but I'll play along .. future reviews will use DDR5-6000 CL30 memory anyway
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
Absolutely no plans for that, there was SO MUCH drama in the past because people kept complaining about slow memory, like 100 posts asking the same thingWhat about testing CPUs at their actual stock settings, aka DDR5-5600 at JEDEC timings in the case of Ryzen 9000?
In the comments of the 9700x review https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/amd-ryzen-7-9700x.325081/post-5305257Where does he state this? DDR5 6000 c32 is cheap and shouldn’t have any issues running on z790 or b650/x670.
To play it a bit safe with compatibility, because if I can run CL30 only on Intel and not on all AMD I'm fucked because you will crucify me for running mismatched settings.
It is not slow, but I'll play along .. future reviews will use DDR5-6000 CL30 memory anyway
System Name | Silicon Graphics O2 |
---|---|
Processor | R5000 / 180MHz |
Cooling | noisy fan |
Memory | 384 MB |
Storage | 4 GB |
Case | the one with the old logo and proud of it ;) |
Software | IRIX 6.5 |
Too bad...Absolutely no plans for that, there was SO MUCH drama in the past because people kept complaining about slow memory, like 100 posts asking the same thing
System Name | Personal Gaming Rig |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7800X3D |
Motherboard | MSI X670E Carbon |
Cooling | MO-RA 3 420 |
Memory | 32GB 6000MHz |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA |
Storage | 4x 2TB Nvme |
Display(s) | Samsung G8 OLED |
Case | Silverstone FT04 |
What if it is just 3% faster than 7800X3D?As a gamer I will keep waiting for the 9800X3D
System Name | Silicon Graphics O2 |
---|---|
Processor | R5000 / 180MHz |
Cooling | noisy fan |
Memory | 384 MB |
Storage | 4 GB |
Case | the one with the old logo and proud of it ;) |
Software | IRIX 6.5 |
Over here in my part of Europe, the MSRP for the R9 9950X is 49% higher than the street price of the R9 7950X.9950x 3% faster than 7950x and yet it costs almost 300 usd more money.
System Name | Can it run Warhammer 3? |
---|---|
Processor | 7800X3D @ 5Ghz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX |
Cooling | Enermax Liqmax III 360mm |
Memory | Teamgroup DDR5 CL30 6000Mhz 32GB |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte 4090 |
Storage | Silicon Power XS70, Corsair T700 |
Display(s) | BenQ EX2710Q, BenQEX270M |
Case | NZXT H7 Flow |
Audio Device(s) | AudioTechnica M50xBT |
Power Supply | SuperFlower Leadex III 850W |
System Name | 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is) |
Motherboard | MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 |
Cooling | Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6 |
Memory | 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3) |
Video Card(s) | ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580 |
Storage | NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage |
Display(s) | Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5 |
Case | Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard |
Audio Device(s) | onboard |
Power Supply | Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W |
Mouse | CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech |
Keyboard | CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech |
Software | Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10 |
Lol. What's even more funny is that the top CPUs from both Intel and AMD are all within 10% performance of each other and cover two generations and up to four years of time (7950X, 7950X3D, 13900K, 14900K, 9950X). It's like they've hit some kind of wall and performance gains on the client desktop are over.9000 series is by far the best advertisement campaign I have seen until now, for the 7000 series models.
System Name | Unknown |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Bulldozer FX8320 @ 4.4Ghz |
Motherboard | Asus Crosshair V |
Cooling | XSPC Raystorm 750 EX240 for CPU |
Memory | 8 GB CORSAIR Vengeance Red DDR3 RAM 1922mhz (10-11-9-27) |
Video Card(s) | XFX R9 290 |
Storage | Samsung SSD 254GB and Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s |
Display(s) | AOC 23" @ 1920x1080 + Asus 27" 1440p |
Case | HAF X |
Audio Device(s) | X Fi Titanium 5.1 Surround Sound |
Power Supply | 750 Watt PP&C Silencer Black |
Software | Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit |
You have to go down to go up again?Multithread efficiency WORSE THAN PREVIOUS GEN?! I wonder how they managed that...
Eh, it's very similar on average. However Intel released something every year instead so you'd need to look at 2 gens to properly compare.To be honest, Intel's improvements were even worse than these
So, extremely pathetic. Maybe it needs faster than DDR5-6000?
It's likely they need a totally new way of designing and producing processors for any meaningful gains in performance. Perhaps they at least can lower TDP, so we get 14900KS@6.3GHz performance at Ryzen 5600@3.8GHz power draw, this would still be helpful, especially for battery life and maintaining lower temperatures during summer months.Lol. What's even more funny is that the top CPUs from both Intel and AMD are all within 10% performance of each other and cover two generations and up to four years of time (7950X, 7950X3D, 13900K, 14900K, 9950X). It's like they've hit some kind of wall and performance gains on the client desktop are over.
Fail.Over here in my part of Europe, the MSRP for the R9 9950X is 49% higher than the street price of the R9 7950X.
Q6600 -> Nehalem -> Sandy -> Haswell -> Skylake was about +20-25% gains roughly every two years and Coffee Lake was similar, because of apps not being designed to use more than 4 cores most of the time, 8600K was also usually +20-25% faster than the 6600K after roughly 2 yearsEh, it's very similar on average. However Intel released something every year instead so you'd need to look at 2 gens to properly compare.
System Name | "Icy Resurrection" |
---|---|
Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM |
Memory | 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V |
Video Card(s) | ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition |
Storage | 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD |
Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
Case | Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Microsoft Classic Intellimouse |
Keyboard | Galax Stealth STL-03 |
Software | Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2 |
Benchmark Scores | I pulled a Qiqi~ |
For AVX512 workloads it`s certainly memory bandwidth starved but it already can't use the entire DDR-6000 bandwidth(which is about 96 GB/s).
This is almost certainly why it barely had improvements over the 7950X in Y-Cruncher, it just doesn`t have the bandwidth to do more.
View attachment 358933
System Name | Main |
---|---|
Processor | 5700X |
Motherboard | MSI B450M Mortar |
Cooling | Corsair H80i v2 |
Memory | G.SKILL Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600MHz CL16 |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 3060 Ti VENTUS 2X OC 8GB GDDR6X |
Display(s) | LG 32GK850G |
Case | NOX HUMMER ZN |
Power Supply | Seasonic GX-750 |
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6) |
Cooling | Noctua NH-C14S (two fans) |
Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3200 |
Video Card(s) | Reference Vega 64 |
Storage | Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA |
Display(s) | Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700 |
Case | Fractal Design R5 |
Power Supply | Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W |
Mouse | Logitech |
VR HMD | Oculus Rift |
Software | Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04 |
At least for y-cruncher, it's being held back by memory bandwidth. Compare the single threaded speedup over Zen 4 to the minimal multithreaded speedup.For AVX512 workloads it`s certainly memory bandwidth starved but it already can't use the entire DDR-6000 bandwidth(which is about 96 GB/s).
This is almost certainly why it barely had improvements over the 7950X in Y-Cruncher, it just doesn`t have the bandwidth to do more.
View attachment 358933