• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Announces New AGESA 1.2.0.2, 105W cTDP for 9700X and 9600X, Intercore Latency Improvements

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,233 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD today made four key announcements for its Ryzen 9000 series "Granite Ridge" desktop processors based on the "Zen 5" microarchitecture. These mainly aim to improve upon the products as originally launched in August. To begin with, AMD announced a 105 W cTDP (configurable TDP) mode for the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 7 9600X processors, with full warranty coverage. This setting can be enabled in the UEFI setup program of a motherboard running its latest version of UEFI firmware, which encapsulates the AGESA ComboAM5 PI 1.2.0.2 microcode. The setting raises the PPT (package power tracking) value of the 9700X and 9600X to 140 W, and treats them as if they were 105 W TDP processors. These chips were originally launched by AMD with 65 W (88 W PPT), and as reviewers quickly found out, unlocking power improves performance at stock clock speeds, as it improves boost frequency residence of these chips.

Next up, is the AGESA PI 1.2.0.2 microcode itself, which introduces the 105 W cTDP mode for the 9700X and 9600X along with warranty coverage, which we just talked about; plus works to improve the core-to-core latency on the Ryzen 9 9900X and Ryzen 9 9950X. These are processors with two CPU complex dies (CCDs), each with either 8 or 6 cores enabled. To the software, this is still a single-socket (1P) CPU with 12 or 16 cores. Although some awareness of the dual-CCD architecture is added to the OS scheduler to help it localize certain kinds of workloads (such as games) to a single CCD, reviewers noted that core-to-core latency on the dual-CCD chips was still too high, which should affect performance when a software's threads are migrating between cores, or if a workload is multithreaded, such as media encoding. AMD addressed exactly this with the new AGESA PI 1.2.0.2 update.



AMD describes the technical aspect of what was causing undesirably high core-to-core latency and erroneous core-parking during multithreaded workloads:
This was mainly due to some corner cases where it takes two transactions to both read, and write, when information is shared across cores on different parts of a Ryzen 9 9000 series processor. However, we've been working on optimizing this since the launch of the 9000 series. In the new 1.2.0.2 BIOS update, we've managed to cut the number of transactions in half for this use case, which helps reduce core-to-core latency in multi-CCD models.

AMD says that reviewers should still expect high values in core-to-core latency benchmarks, but in practice, performance in multithreaded workloads should improve, which can be verified by benchmarking across a typical set of processor benchmarks. The company says:
we've been working on optimizing this since the launch of the 9000 series. In the new 1.2.0.2 BIOS update, we've managed to cut the number of transactions in half for this use case, which helps reduce core-to-core latency in multi-CCD models. While this will show up on some core-to-core latency benchmarks, the real-world improvement is most noticeable in a very specific gaming scenario: in heavily threaded games that don't trigger core parking. Our lab tests suggest Metro, Starfield, and Borderlands 3 can show some uplift, as well as synthetic tests like 3DMark Time Spy.

Next up, the company added official AMD EXPO support for DDR5-8000. With this generation, AMD introduced support for high DDR5 memory speeds using a 1:2 UCLK:MCLK ratio. We recently did a comprehensive study of how the Ryzen 9 9950X handles DDR5-8000, and whether you should use it over the DDR5-6000 sweetspot frequency. You can read all about it in our Zen 5 Memory Scaling article.

In the following weeks, you can expect memory manufacturers to launch new high-speed DDR5 memory kits with AMD EXPO profiles—speeds such as DDR5-6800, DDR5-7200, DDR5-7600, and DDR5-8000. AMD EXPO is similar to Intel XMP, it is an SPD extension that makes it easy for end-users to enable a memory kit's advertised speeds and timings in the UEFI setup program. EXPO covers all the sub-timings and voltages that are unique to Ryzen processors' memory architecture.


Lastly, motherboards based on the AMD X870E and X870 chipsets should be available to purchase from today. AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors are compatible with AMD 600-series chipset motherboards using a firmware update (which can be done using UEFI BIOS Flashback); but the new crop of motherboards based on AMD 800-series chipset support these processors out of the box, besides introducing a few modern I/O features such as 40 Gbps USB4 and Wi-Fi 7 networking.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,840 (0.63/day)
Nice regarding the warranty coverage. Not so nice that this whole series feels ‘rushed’.
 
Joined
Jul 22, 2024
Messages
31 (0.25/day)
Location
New Jersey, United States
System Name Dumpster PC MAX Edition
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Motherboard ASRock B550 Phantom Gaming 4/ac
Cooling AMD Wraith Spire Stock Cooler
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200MHz C16
Video Card(s) ASUS ProArt OC RTX 4070 SUPER
Storage Crucial 2.5" SATA 1TB + Samsung 990 EVO 1TB + ADATA SU750 1TB
Display(s) Acer EK271U Ebiip 27" 2K QHD (2560 x 1440) 100Hz LED
Case Fractal Design North (Black)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro 2nd Generation
Power Supply Thermaltake Smart 600W
Mouse E-Waste Dell Mouse
Keyboard Keychron K10 Pro
Software Windows 11 (Latest Release)
It's good that people will be covered under warranty if they choose to enable the 105W mode. However, I can't shake the feeling that this is yet another one of AMD's hacked-together efforts to salvage public morale towards Zen 5. Basically everything they've done to address this launch has felt sloppy, desperate and most of all, incompetent. It's AMD's usual playbook for sure, but if this cluster-F and the resulting hit to Zen 5's sales isn't enough for them to vet their marketing department and fire a lot of people, then nothing will ever be.
 
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Messages
489 (0.36/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Homebase
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus X570S UD
Cooling Scythe Mugen 5 RGB
Memory 2*16 Kingston Fury DDR4-3600 double ranked
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 16 GB
Storage 1*512 WD Red SN700, 1*2TB Curcial P5, 1*2TB Sandisk Plus (TLC), 1*14TB Toshiba MG
Display(s) Philips E-line 275E1S
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Power Supply Corsair RM850 2019
Mouse Sharkoon Sharkforce Pro
Keyboard Fujitsu KB955
This is exactly why they should start to iron out such thing before the launch. It is always the same.....and as much as I like the products and the company, they could easily avoid bad PR by doing the R&D and QA properly before they launch. It is not that they would lose so much time, it is usually about 2 months time when they have ditched out all the main buggy things in AGESA and Co.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,612 (2.41/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
It's good that people will be covered under warranty if they choose to enable the 105W mode. However, I can't shake the feeling that this is yet another one of AMD's hacked-together efforts to salvage public morale towards Zen 5. Basically everything they've done to address this launch has felt sloppy, desperate and most of all, incompetent. It's AMD's usual playbook for sure, but if this cluster-F and the resulting hit to Zen 5's sales isn't enough for them to vet their marketing department and fire a lot of people, then nothing will ever be.
You're aware that this is the "new" marketing department, right? They have already let a lot of people go over the past few years, some real AMD and ATI long timers got kicked out.

This is exactly why they should start to iron out such thing before the launch. It is always the same.....and as much as I like the products and the company, they could easily avoid bad PR by doing the R&D and QA properly before they launch. It is not that they would lose so much time, it is usually about 2 months time when they have ditched out all the main buggy things in AGESA and Co.
I hope you put Intel to the exact same standards. I mean, they have two generations of CPUs that are self destructing after all...
I'm not saying AMD has done a great job here, as they clearly rushed things, but it appears to be their typical MO and this is what now, the fourth time they have done it?
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2016
Messages
232 (0.08/day)
Location
Norway
System Name none
Processor AMD R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE B650 AORUS MASTER
Cooling ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III 420
Memory 32GB G.SKILL @6400MT/s CL32-36-36-28-68 tweaked sub-timings
Video Card(s) ASUS TUF 4090
Storage Samsung PM9A1
Display(s) SAMSUNG 32" IDK WHAT
Case Corsair 7000D
Audio Device(s) none
Power Supply Corsair HX1500
Mouse Corsair
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Who cares!
I wish I knew what difference it makes in games. Gigabyte is slacking when it comes to it's B650 Aorus Master as of the time of writing this.
 
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Messages
489 (0.36/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Homebase
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus X570S UD
Cooling Scythe Mugen 5 RGB
Memory 2*16 Kingston Fury DDR4-3600 double ranked
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 16 GB
Storage 1*512 WD Red SN700, 1*2TB Curcial P5, 1*2TB Sandisk Plus (TLC), 1*14TB Toshiba MG
Display(s) Philips E-line 275E1S
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Power Supply Corsair RM850 2019
Mouse Sharkoon Sharkforce Pro
Keyboard Fujitsu KB955
You're aware that this is the "new" marketing department, right? They have already let a lot of people go over the past few years, some real AMD and ATI long timers got kicked out.


I hope you put Intel to the exact same standards. I mean, they have two generations of CPUs that are self destructing after all...
I'm not saying AMD has done a great job here, as they clearly rushed things, but it appears to be their typical MO and this is what now, the fourth time they have done it?
I am even stricter on Intel since they pressured and ruled the market for so long.......but yeah, I can't remember a flawless launch from AMD in the last years. Still looking at AM5 for the next upgrade though.
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
73 (0.03/day)
I tried the new FW3.08 AGESA 1.2.0.2 on my ASRock B650I Lighting, but it has a bug which reduced my rear USB-C 10Gbps port to 480Mbps (USB 2.0) speeds. I flashed it back to FW2.10 AGESA 1.1.0.3 and my full port speed returned. There are a few firmware versions in between, but I didn't bother to see if they had the bug or not. I'll stay on FW2.10 for now.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,751 (1.73/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name stress-less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI PRO B650M-A Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6400 CL30 / 2133 fclk
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
im actually excited for the 9800x3d -finewine strikes again.
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
1,141 (0.20/day)
Location
SCOTLAND!
System Name Machine XX
Processor Ryzen 7600
Motherboard MSI X670E GAMING PLUS
Cooling 120mm heatsink
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) RX5700XT 8Gb
Storage 280GB Optane 900p
Display(s) 19" + 23" + 17"
Case ATX
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply 800W
Software Windows 11
as far as i can find there is no actual evidence that it does anything other than look good on synthetic tests. very few tasks require threads to communicate and use more than 8 cores.
 
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
2,881 (1.20/day)
Nice regarding the warranty coverage. Not so nice that this whole series feels ‘rushed’.
Not sure about rushed. More likely Server and mobile is their main concern and they also realised power was getting out of hand. It's not like Zen 4 was slow, so getting as small improvement in performance at a fair bit lower power isn't all bad. Also Windoze has shown it self to be a shit show for AMD (AMD must also be partly to blame). Also can't wait to see the looks on those gamers that have been trashing Zen 5 and think 105W TDP will improve performance in games.

I'm a bit confused. I've had this update from ASRock for a couple of weeks now.
They were probably beta fw, this is now official and with warranty, which there wasn't before.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,278 (3.93/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
I get that the 105W cTDP is there to appease the whiners, but didn't most reviewers who tested the 9700X using PBO at higher TDPs basically see very little gain?

Essentially, 96-97% of the performance that the 105W cTDP delivers is provided at 65W, and for those who want to push the limits there's always PBO+ making predetermined TDPs irrelevant anyway...
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
9,133 (3.34/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
as far as i can find there is no actual evidence that it does anything other than look good on synthetic tests. very few tasks require threads to communicate and use more than 8 cores.
Run HWinfo in the background while palying Space Marine 2. There are some Games where even if Vcache is not supported CPU performance matters.
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Messages
58 (0.05/day)
Location
Belgium
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair X670E Hero
Cooling EKWB loop
Memory Corsair Dominator Titanium DDR5-8000C38
Video Card(s) nvidia RTX 4090 FE
Storage WD Black SN850X 1TB // WD Black SN850X 2TB // WD Black SN770 2TB
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G8 OLED
Case Corsair 5000D Airflow
Power Supply Corsair HX1500i
Mouse Glorious Model D 2 Pro
Keyboard Lemokey P1 Pro
Running this bios on my X670E Hero and so far runs my XMP-8000 kit just fine :)
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
9,133 (3.34/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
Running this bios on my X670E Hero and so far runs my XMP-8000 kit just fine :)
Level 1 said that the Memory support has improved with X870E but we don't have reviews yet. That is good what are your timings?
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,648 (1.51/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
I get that the 105W cTDP is there to appease the whiners, but didn't most reviewers who tested the 9700X using PBO at higher TDPs basically see very little gain?

Essentially, 96-97% of the performance that the 105W cTDP delivers is provided at 65W, and for those who want to push the limits there's always PBO+ making predetermined TDPs irrelevant anyway...
Only workloads that resulted in relatively low clock speeds at the 65 W TDP saw significant performance increases with PBO. In TPU's review, Blender was the standout with a 15% increase at the cost of more than doubled power consumption. Given that result, the impact of the 105 W setting is unlikely to be significant enough to warrant the higher power consumption.
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
1,141 (0.20/day)
Location
SCOTLAND!
System Name Machine XX
Processor Ryzen 7600
Motherboard MSI X670E GAMING PLUS
Cooling 120mm heatsink
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) RX5700XT 8Gb
Storage 280GB Optane 900p
Display(s) 19" + 23" + 17"
Case ATX
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply 800W
Software Windows 11
Run HWinfo in the background while palying Space Marine 2. There are some Games where even if Vcache is not supported CPU performance matters.
thats nothing to do with inter ccd latency.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,753 (1.03/day)
This is evidence that AMD rushed the release of a product that is clearly not ready. I assume they did this to try and beat Intel because they anticipate a competitive product from them. Instead of helping them, it backfired.
 
Joined
May 11, 2018
Messages
1,254 (0.52/day)
I don't think this is trying to fix "rushed" product that left untapped performance at the release.

I think this is purely a response to their bold claims of performance uplifts compared to previous generation, and not delivering them.

And I also think all this will not be enough. Sure, you can "overclock" the power limited CPUs, but that won't help their bigger brothers one little bit.

And "Intercore Latency Improvements" won't fix the big difference between what they promised and what they released. But it will provide some nice graphs, improvements in very select scenarios. And I'm sure AMD will show those as if it applies to whole range of performances.

It will of course fall on reviewers to check their claims and re-review the CPUs.
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
249 (0.04/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Shadow Warrior
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte X670 Gaming X AX
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE ARGB White
Memory 64GB 6000Mhz cl30
Video Card(s) XFX 7900XT
Storage 8TB NVME + 4TB SSD + 3x12TB 5400rpm
Display(s) HP X34 Ultrawide 165hz
Case Fractal Design Define 7 (modded)
Audio Device(s) SMSL DL200 DAC / AKG 271 Studio / Moondrop Joker..
Power Supply Corsair hx1000i
Mouse Roccat Burst Pro
Keyboard Cherry Stream 3.0 SX-switches
VR HMD Quest 1 (OLED), Pico 4 128GB
Software Win11 x64
Level 1 said that the Memory support has improved with X870E but we don't have reviews yet. That is good what are your timings?
hardware unboxed said don't bother in their recent motherboard review as there's nothing to gain. It's perfectly optimized for 6000mhz as it is.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Messages
374 (0.32/day)
Fixing issues that should never have been seen by retail. AMD had no competition in fact the opposition was on the back foot but somehow AMD still managed to score an own goal. AMD needs to grow up, learn to win and stop making me nervous.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
220 (1.79/day)
System Name AM4_TimeKiller
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600X @ all-core 4.7 GHz
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B550-E Gaming
Cooling Arctic Freezer II 420 rev.7 (push-pull)
Memory G.Skill TridentZ RGB, 2x16 GB DDR4, B-Die, 3800 MHz @ CL14-15-14-29-43 1T, 53.2 ns
Video Card(s) ASRock Radeon RX 7800 XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 990 PRO 1 TB, Kingston KC3000 1 TB, Kingston KC3000 2 TB
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-850
Mouse Logitech wireless mouse
Keyboard Logitech wireless keyboard
as far as i can find there is no actual evidence that it does anything other than look good on synthetic tests. very few tasks require threads to communicate and use more than 8 cores.
If you're referring to X3D cache, then you're wrong. X3D cache is exposed to CPU cores in the same manner as regular L3 cache. In other words, 3D cache is in fact regular L3 cache but stacked vertically (three times) rather than being placed planarly.

It has already been proven (multiple times) that the larger the L3 cache (3D cache) is, the bigger is the benefit for tasks that intensively utilizes RAM for caching. For example, take a look at how Ryzen X3D chips scale with different RAM modules compared to regular non-X3D chips. The less it is required to access the RAM, the lesser is system's dependendance on it.

Running this bios on my X670E Hero and so far runs my XMP-8000 kit just fine :)
That's because X670(E) uses the same chipset silicon as X870(E) - the Promontory 21 (+ Promontory 21).

Level 1 said that the Memory support has improved with X870E but we don't have reviews yet. That is good what are your timings?
It has been improved through AGESA updates. ASUS now lists "up to 8000 MT/s" speeds even with X670(E) and B650(E) mobos:
Before the release of Zen 5, there were listed speeds "up to 6800 MT/s". 2 years old motherboards could not physically improve support over time, thus, AGESA updates along with new Zen 5 CPUs being the only logical reasons for sudden support of memory speeds up to 8000 MT/s.

AMD tries to play marketing here, to play us to buy new boards - to think that we get support for something new only with newer boards. Don't get fooled.
8000 MT/s on Zen 4/5 is only a very little (meaning negligible) bit faster than 6000 MT/s. That's because of P'o's memory controller unable being to run in 1:1 mode beyond 6400 MHz.
Only with 7800 MT/s and more you're actually starting to overcome latency penalties caused by running in out of synch mode (2:1).
 
Top