- Joined
- Apr 28, 2007
- Messages
- 1,193 (0.19/day)
- Location
- Bellevue, WA
System Name | 0BL1V10N |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i7 11700K @ 5.1GHz all-core turbo |
Motherboard | ASRock Z590 Taichi |
Cooling | Cooler Master MasterLiquid 360 (with stock CM fans), 12x Pccooler Moonlight Series ARGB 120mm fans |
Memory | (4x16GB) 64GB Mushkin Redline Lumina 3600MHz 16-19-19-39 XMP |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID 24G (not using stock fans) (+150MHz core, +1000MHz memory) |
Storage | Western Digital Black SN850X 2TB Gen4 NVMe |
Display(s) | 1x Alienware AW3821DW (3840x1600@144Hz), 2x Dell SE2717H (1080p@75Hz) |
Case | Phanteks Enthoo 719 Anthracite Grey |
Audio Device(s) | Schiit Modius + Drop THX AAA 789 + Custom Planar Magnetic Headphones |
Power Supply | Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 1200W (12VHPWR) |
Mouse | Logitech G502 X Plus |
Keyboard | Too many custom mechanical builds to list... |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 22H2 |
7200.10s were great. 11s have really hurt Seagate.
I have nine 320GB Seagates and a 250GB, all the 7200.10 models. They have never given me an issue. Some are even refurbs and worked fine for over a year since I bought them.
I don't have anything against them but... were I work I used to see equal numbers of WD vs Seagate fail. EXCEPT for the new 7200.11s. I have seen MANY of those fail and right now WD is where I would go.
I have nine 320GB Seagates and a 250GB, all the 7200.10 models. They have never given me an issue. Some are even refurbs and worked fine for over a year since I bought them.
I don't have anything against them but... were I work I used to see equal numbers of WD vs Seagate fail. EXCEPT for the new 7200.11s. I have seen MANY of those fail and right now WD is where I would go.