- Joined
- Mar 12, 2009
- Messages
- 78 (0.01/day)
- Location
- Latvia
Sorry about no-screens (already deleted, lazy to run that test again).
My younger bro`s system: single core Celeron 2,8 GHz, GT 8600, RAM 2 Gb (puter`s old and weak, but he`s happy, pls don`t laugh).
===========================
XP Pro SP3/32:
Safari 4 beta - 549
Chrome 2.0.169 - 392
Opera 9.64 - 263
FF 3.0.7 - 148
IE7 - 75
=====================
Same system, OS - W7/32 b7048:
Safari 4 - 617
Chrome 1.0 - 455 (couldn`t install 2.0.169, dunno why)
Safari 3 - 379
Opera 9.64 - 272
FF 3.0.7 - 155
IE 8 beta - 142.
Final thoughts: any of IE is failure. FF`s disapointing me after yesterday. Safari 4 is quick, but crashed alot on W7 (well, it`s beta as well as W7). Chrome looks pretty quick and handy for now.
My younger bro`s system: single core Celeron 2,8 GHz, GT 8600, RAM 2 Gb (puter`s old and weak, but he`s happy, pls don`t laugh).
===========================
XP Pro SP3/32:
Safari 4 beta - 549
Chrome 2.0.169 - 392
Opera 9.64 - 263
FF 3.0.7 - 148
IE7 - 75
=====================
Same system, OS - W7/32 b7048:
Safari 4 - 617
Chrome 1.0 - 455 (couldn`t install 2.0.169, dunno why)
Safari 3 - 379
Opera 9.64 - 272
FF 3.0.7 - 155
IE 8 beta - 142.
Final thoughts: any of IE is failure. FF`s disapointing me after yesterday. Safari 4 is quick, but crashed alot on W7 (well, it`s beta as well as W7). Chrome looks pretty quick and handy for now.