Wile E
Power User
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2006
- Messages
- 24,318 (3.72/day)
System Name | The ClusterF**k |
---|---|
Processor | 980X @ 4Ghz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12 |
Cooling | MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360 |
Memory | 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T |
Video Card(s) | Evga GTX 580 |
Storage | Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB |
Display(s) | HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS |
Case | Technofront Bench Station |
Audio Device(s) | Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750 |
Power Supply | ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W |
Software | Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4 |
And I guess innocent until proven guilty means very little to you?no proof they didnt either, and their comments when interviewed dont lead me to belive they removed it for any reasion other then because it gave ati an advantege.
and the optimizations for doom3 took a user very little time to figuar out, if u would like, i could link the post on megagames about it....
http://www.megagames.com/news/html/pc/doom3enhancetheexperiencept2.shtml
theres more advanced versions but the megagames one is easy to find thats why i use it
fact is that as u see the changes where EASY to make and made a HUGE diffrance in perf for ATI cards, but Id include such shader/math based code, because nvidia cards do texture lookups faster then they do math(at the time)
Yeah, and that quote in no way goes against what I said about them optimizing for nV, but not sabotaging ATI. No matter how you look at it, it's not sabotage to NOT program for something's strong points. There is no conspiracy.