• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Collaborates With Microsoft On High Performance GPU Computing

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,206 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
NVIDIA today announced work with Microsoft to promote NVIDIA Tesla graphics processing units (GPUs) for high performance parallel computing using the Windows HPC Server 2008 operating system.

"The coupling of GPUs and CPUs illustrates the enormous power and opportunity of multicore co-processing," said Dan Reed, corporate vice president of Extreme Computing at Microsoft. "NVIDIA's work with Microsoft and the Windows HPC Server platform, is helping enable scientists and researchers in many fields achieve supercomputer performance on diverse applications."

NVIDIA Research developed several GPU-enabled applications on the Windows HPC Server 2008 platform, such as a ray tracing application that can be used for advanced photo-realistic modeling of automobiles. Related to this, NVIDIA worked with Microsoft Research to install a large Tesla GPU computing cluster and is studying applications that are optimized for the GPU.

In addition, a whole range of enterprise applications - such as data mining, machine learning and business intelligence, as well as scientific applications like molecular dynamics, financial computing and seismic processing - are taking advantage of the massively parallel CUDA architecture on which NVIDIA's GPUs are based to achieve higher levels of productivity.

The CUDA architecture enables developers to use the CPU and the GPU together in a co-processing model. Compute-intensive sections of an application use the parallel computing capabilities of the GPU, while the sequential part of an application's code runs on the CPU.

"The combination of GPUs and the Windows platform has been a great benefit to our VMD (Visual Molecular Dynamics) user community, bringing advanced molecular visualization and analysis capabilities to thousands of users," said John Stone, senior research programmer at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. "As we move toward even larger biomolecular structures, GPUs will become increasingly important as they bring even more computational power to bear on what will be highly parallelizable computational problems."

"The scientific community was one of the first to realize the potential of the GPU to transform its work, observing speedups ranging from 20 to 200 times while using a range of compute-intensive applications," said Andy Keane, general manager of NVIDIA's Tesla business. "Researchers are increasingly using Windows on workstations and in data centers due to strong development tools like Microsoft Visual Studio, its ease of system management and its lower total cost of ownership."

NVIDIA Tesla high-performance GPU computing products support Windows XP and Windows Vista in the workstation and Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008 in the data center. Tesla C1060 and S1070 GPU computing products are available from most major system vendors including Cray, Dell, HP and Lenovo.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,974 (1.72/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s) 55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Alot of lingo for someone at nvidia getting a E-mail asking if they plan on being DX11 compliant, but only after saying DX11 is nothing big.
 

newfellow

New Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
314 (0.06/day)
System Name ID
Processor Q9450 ~3.74Ghz
Motherboard ASUS-P5E
Cooling Air
Memory G.Skill CL4-8GB
Video Card(s) ATI/Geforce 5850/9800
Storage A-lot
Display(s) BenQ G2400WT
Case 900
Audio Device(s) Shitty ASUS FX;P
Power Supply OCZ GXS 850W
Software -
Benchmark Scores too many machines to spec
Well, if you you got nothing better to do than watch ATI roll over with a thumb truck sure wy not start building integrations and compine the same old stuff with other old stuff to get old-old new stuff.

+1 for lingo
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (1.18/day)
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
Alot of lingo for someone at nvidia getting a E-mail asking if they plan on being DX11 compliant, but only after saying DX11 is nothing big.

I'm pretty sure they said DX11 isn't going to sell ATi's cards, not that DX11 wasn't an issue. It would be really silly to assume they thought nothing of DX11 since they are making a DX11 card in Nov. ATi's graphical horsepower is going to sell cards. Read between the lines :D

Oh wait... DX11 isn't mentioned once in the article D:
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
921 (0.16/day)
Location
SouthERN Africa
System Name inferKNIGHT
Processor Intel Core i5-4590
Motherboard MSI Z97i Gaming AC
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 2 x 4GB DDR3-1866 Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer (R/G)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 STRIX 3.5GB (+0.5GB? o.O)
Storage 1 x 256GB Cricial M550, 1 x 2TB Samsung 7200.12
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T260
Case Corsair Obsidian 250D
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1.1 pro x64

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.11/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Alot of lingo for someone at nvidia getting a E-mail asking if they plan on being DX11 compliant, but only after saying DX11 is nothing big.

I don't believe they ever said DX11 was nothing big, I belive it is more accurate to say they said DX11 won't be the deciding factor in people buying the next generation graphics cards.

It probably has something to do with their past experience with the issue. Their statement seems pretty logical actually, if you look at it from their eyes, after seeing huge amounts of users flock to their 8800 series, but stick with XP... Pretty clear sign that the latest DX version doesn't sell cards, horse power does.

And as far as I can tell, this article has nothing to do with DX11. Just because the words Ray Tracing come up, that doesn't mean it has to do with DX11.

This is more along the lines of CUDA and doing computational work on the GPU then it has to do with DX11.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,180 (1.14/day)
I thought after the xbox gpu legal battle Nvidia and Microsoft hated each other?

Must be for the press then a bit of bigging oneself up!
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,028 (6.62/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
its fact how bad performance was thanks to Microsoft in the first place with Vista, Vista was supposed to be Windows 7 actually.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.11/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
its fact how bad performance was thanks to Microsoft in the first place with Vista, Vista was supposed to be Windows 7 actually.

Not really entirely Microsoft's fault that Vista had bad performance issues out of the gate.

A lot of the major performance issues were caused by driver and program incompatibilities, not the OS itself. Almost all of which have been worked out to the point where it is hard to tell the difference between Vista and XP performance wise(measure the difference, yes, but actually feel the difference in everyday use, no).

And it isn't like Windows 7 made huge leaps in performance over Vista either, the two performance relatively identically.

And Vista wasn't supposed to be Windows 7. Vista was supposed to be Vista. It is Microsoft's standard to release an unrefined OS first, refine it, then release it as a new OS with a few pretty addons. They did it with 95 and 98, they did it with 2000 and XP, and now they are doing it with Vista and Win7.

Vista served its purpose, to get a radically new OS out into the public, to make people asking for a new OS happy, and still allowing MS more time to refine a better OS.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,974 (1.72/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s) 55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Exactly, except all the cool addons that were thrown out of the Vista wagon to get it across the finish line.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,604 (6.51/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
I don't believe they ever said DX11 was nothing big, I belive it is more accurate to say they said DX11 won't be the deciding factor in people buying the next generation graphics cards.

Considering all of the pre-built computer businesses are jumping on the ATi DX11 bandwagon, I would say they are wrong.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.11/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Considering all of the pre-built computer businesses are jumping on the ATi DX11 bandwagon, I would say they are wrong.

Really, they are jumping on the DX11 bandwagon? Are you sure they aren't jumping on the more horsepower bandwagon?

What makes you think they are doing it because of DX11 and not just because the cards perform better?
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (3.67/day)
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
Exactly, except all the cool addons that were thrown out of the Vista wagon to get it across the finish line.

Except we still don't have WinFS. :shadedshu

And i have to agree with Newtekie on this one, most people are gonna buy for the horsepower, not for DX11 specifically. DX11 is just an added bonus.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,974 (1.72/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s) 55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Except we still don't have WinFS. :shadedshu

And i have to agree with Newtekie on this one, most people are gonna buy for the horsepower, not for DX11 specifically. DX11 is just an added bonus.

I missed the oppertunity to try it, however the rest of the testers reported bad things like massive corruption and other issues. This was awhile back though.



I want DX11 just like I wanted DX10, force the move forward, and punish those lagging.


However after seeing the possability of what we can still get with DX9 in HL FF mods it is amazing. I want more of the other options it brings, the ability to really work in quality with AVCHD files and have the muchmore powerful GPU do it. A quad is OK, but a 2GB 5870 should eat it up.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
1,334 (0.23/day)
Except we still don't have WinFS. :shadedshu

And i have to agree with Newtekie on this one, most people are gonna buy for the horsepower, not for DX11 specifically. DX11 is just an added bonus.

How many people really want WinFS anyway? Don't Windows has enough overhead already?
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,028 (6.62/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
How many people really want WinFS anyway? Don't Windows has enough overhead already?

WinFS is supposed to do away with NTFS and FAT32, aka a lightweight, streamlined partition and file system.
 

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
24,029 (3.74/day)
Location
London,UK
System Name DarnGosh Edition
Processor AMD 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E GAMING PLUS
Cooling Thermalright AM5 Contact Frame + Phantom Spirit 120SE
Memory G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 6000 CL32-38-38-96
Video Card(s) Asus Dual Radeon™ RX 6700 XT OC Edition
Storage WD SN770 1TB (Boot)| 2x 2TB WD SN770 (Gaming)| 2x 2TB Crucial BX500| 2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300
Display(s) LG GP850-B
Case Corsair 760T (White) {1xCorsair ML120 Pro|5xML140 Pro}
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850 80+ GOLD
Mouse Logitech G502 X
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 11 Home
Benchmark Scores ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
I'm pretty sure they said DX11 isn't going to sell ATi's cards, not that DX11 wasn't an issue. It would be really silly to assume they thought nothing of DX11 since they are making a DX11 card in Nov. ATi's graphical horsepower is going to sell cards. Read between the lines :D

Oh wait... DX11 isn't mentioned once in the article D:

sounds like another DX10.1 fiasco brewing..... was it ever there, or did it ever exist to begin with? :rolleyes::rolleyes: sounds like a job for Mulder & Sully
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
337 (0.06/day)
System Name Roxy
Processor i7 5930K @ 4.5GHz (167x27 1.35V)
Motherboard X99-A/USB3.1
Cooling Barrow Infinity Mirror, EK 45x420mm, EK X-Res w 10W DDC
Memory 2x16GB Patriot Viper 3600 @3333 16-20-20-38
Video Card(s) XFX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra
Storage Sabrent Rocket 2TB, 4TB WD Mechanical
Display(s) Acer XZ321Q (144Mhz Freesync Curved 32" 1080p)
Case Modded Cosmos-S Red, Tempered Glass Window, Full Frontal Mesh, Black interior
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Corsair RM 850x White
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire TK
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/e5uz5f
So this is about getting MS to us CUDA rather than the DirectX Compute Shader in their API (DX11) that isn't going to sell cards but GPGUP is?
 
Top