• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Halts Development of Core i5 & Core i7 Chipsets

Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
4,012 (0.72/day)
Location
Sarasota, Florida, USA
System Name Awesomesauce 4.3 | Laptop (MSI GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro-023)
Processor Intel Core i7-5820K 4.16GHz 1.28v/3GHz 1.05v uncore | Intel Core i7-6700HQ @ 3.1GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WiFi LGA2011-v3| Stock
Cooling Corsair H100i v2 w/ 2x EK Vardar F4-120ER + various 120/140mm case fans | Stock
Memory G.Skill RJ-4 16GB DDR4-2666 CL15 quad channel | 12GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti Hybrid SC2 11GB @ 2012/5151 boost | NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB +200/+500 + Intel 530
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 500GB + Seagate 3TB 7200RPM + others | Kingston 256GB M.2 SATA + 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) Acer G257HU 1440p 60Hz AH-IPS 4ms | 17.3" 1920*1080 60Hz wide angle TN notebook panel
Case Fractal Design Define XL R2 | MSI
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | Realtek with quad stereo speakers and subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair HX850i Platinum | 19.5v 180w Delta brick
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 | Windows 10 Home x64
Yeah, in the AMD world I can defintely see Nvidia leading chipset sales with their Nforce 6100/6150 as well as 7025/7050 chipsets (410 and 630 I believe). These chipsets can be seen all around in prebuilt machines even today. However, this is an s939/AM2 chipset, and so you hardly ever see Phenoms (or Phenom IIs) using these. I'd still say I see more AMD prebuilts with Dual Core Athlon X2s than Phenom/Phenom II/Athlon II systems combined.

I wish that OEMs would stop using the 6100/410, 6150/430, and the 7050/630 chipsets, and upgrade to the likes of the GeForce 8200 or 9400 (intel). The 6xxx (MCP51) series is 4+ years old, and the performance can be easily best by Intel's newest IGPs. Then you got retailers like Best Buy pushing: "GeForce 6150: For extreme visual quality and gameplay". C'mon, I owned a DV6000 back in early 2007 with the 6150/430 and overclocking the IGP to 600MHz (and overclocking my Turion X2 to 2GHz/DDR2-800 thanks to nTune) only got me around 300 3Dmark06 points at 1024*768 resolution. These IGPs only have one vertex shader, two pixel shaders, and one ROP, making their performance laughable. Some people buying a computer today expect better graphics performance than their last machine. The 6150 can barely even do Aero without lagging, even moving the mouse over the icons lagged (the gray transparent square that appears when hovering over desktop icons).

[/ RANT]
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,230 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AM2(+) is where the action (sales volume) is. I won't doubt NVIDIA's claims, at least on the ground. Every hardware store here is sure to offer you a GeForce 8000 chipset based board with an AMD processor (in combo discounts). The layman thinks "GeForce" is the name of a motherboard first, and graphics card later.
 

1Kurgan1

The Knife in your Back
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
10,421 (1.79/day)
Location
Duluth, Minnesota
System Name My Comp | Fiancees Comp
Processor i7 5820k @ 4.6Ghz 1.285v| i5 2500k
Motherboard MSI x99 SLI Plus | AsRock Z77 Pro 3
Cooling Watercooled
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 @ 2666 | 12GB DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) AMD R9 290x | MSI 5850 OC
Storage 128gb SSD + 2x 2TB | 2TB
Display(s) Asus 27" LCD | 25" Hanns G
Case CM Storm | CM Elite 430
Audio Device(s) Creative Recon 3D PCIe
Power Supply Enermax Galaxy 1250W | Rosewill 630w
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G100s
Keyboard Logitech G901 | Logitech G105
Software Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64
Benchmark Scores 3D Mark - Fire Strike Extreme - 4403
Its kinda of interesting that now their main chipset sales will be leaning on the direct competition.
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,771 (0.94/day)
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name ---
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.00 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0, Hacked Bios F4.x
Cooling Silenx 4 pipe Tower cooler + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 3 x 120mm, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 16GB + Patriot Memory DDR3 1866 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage Inland 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD for OS, WDC Black - 2TB + 1TB Storage, Inland 480GB SSD - Games
Display(s) 3 x 1080P LCDs - Acer 25" + Acer 23" + HP 23"
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
AM2(+) is where the action (sales volume) is. I won't doubt NVIDIA's claims, at least on the ground. Every hardware store here is sure to offer you a GeForce 8000 chipset based board with an AMD processor (in combo discounts). The layman thinks "GeForce" is the name of a motherboard first, and graphics card later.

I wouldn't agree with it entirely. Frys and Microcenter has more choices with AMD chipset than NVidia chipset. NV 8000 series is hard to find now a days. I favour Nvidia chipsets especially for their RAID choices, better hdd transfer speeds etc over AMD chipset, I am really getting sick and tired of SB600/700 slow HDD transfer speeds. Planning to move my server to NV platform this weekend.
 

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.54/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.

sideeffect

New Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
81 (0.01/day)
Apparantly they don't plan new AMD chipsets either. http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15852/69/.

It seems that Nvidia are pulling out of less profitable highend products so they can focus their efforts on more profitable areas like netbook and mobile phone chipsets.

It is bad news for the PC consumer though.
 

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.54/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
Apparantly they don't plan new AMD chipsets either. http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15852/69/.

It seems that Nvidia are pulling out of less profitable highend products so they can focus their efforts on more profitable areas like netbook and mobile phone chipsets.

It is bad news for the PC consumer though.

That article is older than the front page one on TPU. I think this was more of a rumor on fudzillas part than fact.
 
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
5,392 (0.95/day)
Location
Carrollton, GA
System Name ODIN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
Cooling Dark Rock 4
Memory G Skill RipjawsV F4 3600 Mhz C16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ventus 3X OC LHR
Storage Crucial 2 TB M.2 SSD :: WD Blue M.2 1TB SSD :: 1 TB WD Black VelociRaptor
Display(s) Dell S2716DG 27" 144 Hz G-SYNC
Case Fractal Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Onboard Audio
Power Supply Antec HCP 850 80+ Gold
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Lux
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores I don't benchmark.
What did they do wrong? The dick move of locking PhysX if ATi hardware is detected? Well it was a direct responce to ATi locking native support for PhysX on their hardware, then everyone bitches and moans when nVidia completely locks out ATi. One dick move after another from both sides. So get off your high ATi horse, and open your eyes. Both sides have pulled dick moves. You didn't bitch when ATi blocked native support for PhysX, so obviously PhysX isn't important to you, so why bitch about it now?

AMD/ATI blocked PhysX because they had to. Nvidia owed it as a propriety property and AMD/ATI was never given permission to use it on their own cards. But the deal was if you bought one of the still selling Aegis PhysX cards or (now recently) a Nvidia GPU to run as a dedicated PhysX card, everything was fine. Now they are saying that is a no go too. AMD has done its fair share of dick moves, but PhysX was not one of them.

I just wanted to say this is a little worse than blocking support of a feature like PhysX. Intel is block all possibility to make chipsets for their processors which is unfair business practice. It is like AMD suddenly saying ATI graphics cards will only work with AMD chipsets and detected AMD processors. If you ATI, you buy the whole package which would be unfair.

All this back stabbing crap needs to stop.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,091 (6.63/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Intel has always been greedy, they fit in there with Microsoft, Nvidia seems to be that way with the Physx stuff. Seriously NV is getting hurt, they need to start back with AMD as of chipset making since they wont allow SLI on AMD chipsets etc.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.10/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
AMD/ATI blocked PhysX because they had to. Nvidia owed it as a propriety property and AMD/ATI was never given permission to use it on their own cards. But the deal was if you bought one of the still selling Aegis PhysX cards or (now recently) a Nvidia GPU to run as a dedicated PhysX card, everything was fine. Now they are saying that is a no go too. AMD has done its fair share of dick moves, but PhysX was not one of them.

You should really read up on PhysX and CUDA more. PhysX, despite being owned by nVidia, is free to use, develope for, and support. You don't need nVidia's permission to use it on your hardware, it is completely free to do. So your argument is flawed. ATi blocked native support for PhysX and CUDA on their hardware. Yes, nVidia really only wanted it to spread CUDA and PhysX, because they know the only way CUDA/PhysX would be successful is if it ran natively on both ATi and nVidia hardware. The problem is that support needed to be added to the ATi driver, and ATi refused to help in this area, essentially blocking native PhysX/CUDA support.

This crap about nVidia requiring a licencing fee, or charging ATi needs to stop. This was never the case, CUDA and PhysX are both completely free. Any hardware manufacturer can adapt their hardware use support it free of charge, they just have to write the drivers to support it. ATi didn't even have to do that, a 3rd party was willing to do all the driver developement for them, they just had to include the additions in the driver, and they still refused.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,604 (6.51/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
You should really read up on PhysX and CUDA more. PhysX, despite being owned by nVidia, is free to use, develope for, and support. You don't need nVidia's permission to use it on your hardware, it is completely free to do. So your argument is flawed. ATi blocked native support for PhysX and CUDA on their hardware. Yes, nVidia really only wanted it to spread CUDA and PhysX, because they know the only way CUDA/PhysX would be successful is if it ran natively on both ATi and nVidia hardware. The problem is that support needed to be added to the ATi driver, and ATi refused to help in this area, essentially blocking native PhysX/CUDA support.

This crap about nVidia requiring a licencing fee, or charging ATi needs to stop. This was never the case, CUDA and PhysX are both completely free. Any hardware manufacturer can adapt their hardware use support it free of charge, they just have to write the drivers to support it. ATi didn't even have to do that, a 3rd party was willing to do all the driver developement for them, they just had to include the additions in the driver, and they still refused.

And it works regardless. In Windows 7 anyway. :ohwell: I hope Nvidia gets back into the chipset business once they have their newer hardware settled and ready.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
5,966 (0.95/day)
Location
New York
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, Ryzen 9 5980HX
Motherboard MSI X570 Tomahawk
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4(With Noctua Fans)
Memory 32Gb Crucial 3600 Ballistix
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3080, Asus 6800M
Storage Adata SX8200 1TB NVME/WD Black 1TB NVME
Display(s) Dell 27 Inch 165Hz
Case Phanteks P500A
Audio Device(s) IFI Zen Dac/JDS Labs Atom+/SMSL Amp+Rivers Audio
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G502 SE Hero
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Mk.2
VR HMD Samsung Odyssey Plus
Software Windows 10
And it works regardless. In Windows 7 anyway. :ohwell: I hope Nvidia gets back into the chipset business once they have their newer hardware settled and ready.

Thats true and praise be to the hackers, but I will still stick with what I said, If you buy a Nvidia 8600GTS to go with a AMD card you shouldn't need a hack to get it to run when its supposed to in the first place unless you remove your AMD card.

I don't even have AMD hardware right now but Its not right and I'm never going to agree that it is right, I could go deeper than that but I don't want to derail the thread.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Messages
1,132 (0.18/day)
System Name Grandpa
Processor i5 4690K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97X-UD5H-BK
Cooling water
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence 2400MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 5850 x2
Storage Samsung SM951
Display(s) Catleap 27"
Case coolermaster stacker
Power Supply corsair AX860i
Mouse logitech g5 original
Keyboard Ducky
Software Windows 8.1
Well it's in the news section and is the most popular article for the day - I'd say so.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
2,259 (0.38/day)
System Name Budget AMD System
Processor Threadripper 1900X @ 4.1Ghz (100x41 @ 1.3250V)
Motherboard Gigabyte X399 Aorus Gaming 7
Cooling EKWB X399 Monoblock
Memory 4x8GB GSkill TridentZ RGB 14-14-14-32 CR1 @ 3266
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX Vega₆⁴ Liquid @ 1,800Mhz Core, 1025Mhz HBM2
Storage 1x ADATA SX8200 NVMe, 1x Segate 2.5" FireCuda 2TB SATA, 1x 500GB HGST SATA
Display(s) Vizio 22" 1080p 60hz TV (Samsung Panel)
Case Corsair 570X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic X Series 850W KM3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I wouldn't agree with it entirely. Frys and Microcenter has more choices with AMD chipset than NVidia chipset. NV 8000 series is hard to find now a days. I favour Nvidia chipsets especially for their RAID choices, better hdd transfer speeds etc over AMD chipset, I am really getting sick and tired of SB600/700 slow HDD transfer speeds. Planning to move my server to NV platform this weekend.

SB700 fixed the SB600 issues. Jeeze AMD, unlock the SB700's hidden potential, just because it MAY in a 1 in 1billion to the power of 2 cause a BSOD if you are running more than 20TB on the controller doesn't mean its that big of a deal for current power users.
 

Rakesh95

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
205 (0.04/day)
System Name Cant think of one
Processor Intel Core i7 930 D0
Motherboard Gigabyte EX58A-UD3R
Cooling 3x 200mm, 1x120, 1x120 push for megahalem
Memory Kingston OC DDR3 1600MHz Cas 6
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 275 896mb
Storage 1x WD AV-GP 1 Terabyte(OS/bkup) 1x WD Caviar Green(Data) 1x WD Caviar Blue(MAC OSX 10.5.5
Display(s) Dell 22"
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper
Audio Device(s) ALC889a
Power Supply Coolermaster Utimate Circute protection(UCP) 700
Software Wndows 7 and MAC OSX leopard
wow, that's a pretty inflamatory 1st post you made there.
When they come hunting for your head, you're on your own buddy, I covered my back, LOL!:laugh:

Haha no probs budddy, just saying what i think, im sure a lot of people will agree.
it isnt the kinda first post you expect is it :laugh:
 

DarthCyclonis

New Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
69 (0.01/day)
Processor i7970
Motherboard Gigabyte X58A-UD3R
Cooling Coolmaster V6
Memory 12gb DDR3-2000
Video Card(s) 2 GTX660 SLI
Storage 2 velociraptor 300gb, 1 Intel X25-M 80gb
Display(s) 3x Samsung 23' LCD
Audio Device(s) SoundBlaster X-Fi Platnium
Power Supply Corsair HX1000W
Software Windows 8 Enterprise X64
The last chipset's from Nvidia sucked. They know it, everyone knows it. Since they licensed SLI to intel on their P and X58 chipsets there was not reason for them to have their own. They need to stick to investing money into into perfecting their GPU's and the manufacturing process before they get involved again in the chipset business. Without good GPU's chipsets fore Nvidia are irrelevant.
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
21,745 (3.31/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: i5 10400
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: ASUS Prime H570-Plus
Cooling Cryorig M9 :: Stock
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 2133 :: 2x8GB DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) PNY GTX1070 :: Integrated UHD 630
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB, 2x1TB Seagate RAID 0 :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, 3x4TB Seagate HDD RAID5
Display(s) Onn 165hz 1080p :: Acer 1080p
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - Bose Companion 2 Series III :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: EVGA Supernova 550
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
Gotta love Nvidia bitching about Intel's unfair business tatics. Maybe, Nvidia, you need to look in the mirror and think about buggering the drivers to disable physx support when an ATI card is around...
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
7,662 (1.20/day)
Location
c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Processor C2Q6600 @ 1.6 GHz
Motherboard Anus PQ5
Cooling ACFPro
Memory GEiL2 x 1 GB PC2 6400
Video Card(s) MSi 4830 (RIP)
Storage Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320 GB Perpendicular Recording
Display(s) Dell 17'
Case El Cheepo
Audio Device(s) 7.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software MCE2K5
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
471 (0.08/day)
System Name AMD Black Dragon
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory 4GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum (2x2GB)
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD4870 512MB GDDR5 w AC Twin Turbo
Storage Crucial C300 64GB SSD, 500GB and 2TB Drives
Display(s) Samsung 2494hm, Dell (Samsung?) 1907FP
Case Lancool (Lian-Li on a budget) K7
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC889A, M-Audio Fast Tracks
Power Supply OCZ Mod-X-Stream Pro 600W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium x64, XP Pro
LOL - Core i5 chipset?
What's inside?
No MC needed, no PCIe controller needed!

What kind of development? Fancy heat sink ? :D

LOL that's what I was thinking. One big ass heatsink with a big NVIDIA logo on top of a tiny NForce200 chip hahahha. God I hate NVidia chipsets. Stick with GPUs guys no one cares about your chipsets anymore.
 

Bo_Fox

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
480 (0.08/day)
Location
Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
System Name Flame Vortec Fatal1ty (rig1), UV Tourmaline Confexia (rig2)
Processor 2 x Core i7's 4+Gigahertzzies
Motherboard BL00DR4G3 and DFI UT-X58 T3eH8
Cooling Thermalright IFX-14 (better than TRUE) 2x push-push, Customized TT Big Typhoon
Memory 6GB OCZ DDR3-1600 CAS7-7-7-1T, 6GB for 2nd rig
Video Card(s) 8800GTX for "free" S3D (mtbs3d.com), 4870 1GB, HDTV Wonder (DRM-free)
Storage WD RE3 1TB, Caviar Black 1TB 7.2k, 500GB 7.2k, Raptor X 10k
Display(s) Sony GDM-FW900 24" CRT oc'ed to 2560x1600@68Hz, Dell 2405FPW 24" PVA (HDCP-free)
Case custom gutted-out painted black case, silver UV case, lots of aesthetics-souped stuff
Audio Device(s) Sonar X-Fi MB, Bernstein audio riser.. what??
Power Supply OCZ Fatal1ty 700W, Iceberg 680W, Fortron Booster X3 300W for GPU
Software 2 partitions WinXP-32 on 2 drives per rig, 2 of Vista64 on 2 drives per rig
Benchmark Scores 5.9 Vista Experience Index... yay!!! What??? :)
LOL that's what I was thinking. One big ass heatsink with a big NVIDIA logo on top of a tiny NForce200 chip hahahha. God I hate NVidia chipsets. Stick with GPUs guys no one cares about your chipsets anymore.

+1!!!!!!!!!!!

NF2 was awesome with Soundstorm, NF4 was awesome even though it was missing out on Soundstorm, and then all of the buggy and power-hungry chipsets after that just did not capture the same attention that NF2/3/4 did. We do not seem to be complaining about the lack of NForce chipsets for Corei7's (at least I definitely am not, enjoying my Intel ICH10R).
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
921 (0.16/day)
Location
SouthERN Africa
System Name inferKNIGHT
Processor Intel Core i5-4590
Motherboard MSI Z97i Gaming AC
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 2 x 4GB DDR3-1866 Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer (R/G)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 STRIX 3.5GB (+0.5GB? o.O)
Storage 1 x 256GB Cricial M550, 1 x 2TB Samsung 7200.12
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T260
Case Corsair Obsidian 250D
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1.1 pro x64
Are you agreeing with me or disagreeing? I'm confused.
I'm quite definitely in opposition
Intel is block all possibility to make chipsets for their processors which is unfair business practice. It is like AMD suddenly saying ATI graphics cards will only work with AMD chipsets and detected AMD processors. If you ATI, you buy the whole package which would be unfair.
That would leave us in a world with 3 companies: Apple, AMD & Intel. Brrrr... what a chilling thought. That would of course be until Microsoft decides to make it's own computers, then they'd all be bought over by Sky Net, then the computers would be :cool: and we'd be :respect:, ha ha ha!
No seriously though, that's the way things are headed:shadedshu (buy it'd be Sky Vision [ISP] instead of Sky Net, lol, kiddin again...sigh).
 
Top