- Joined
- Mar 17, 2008
- Messages
- 652 (0.11/day)
- Location
- Bay Shore NY
System Name | BACKTOTHEFUTURE |
---|---|
Processor | Stock I7 920 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4 BIOS F6 |
Cooling | 4 120mm 1 140mm top fan |
Memory | 12 gigabytes of DDR3 1333 RAM |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 780ti |
Storage | Samsung 1.5 terrabyte Steam Drive and 2 Samsung 750 gig Sata 2 in Raid 0 |
Display(s) | HP LP3065 30" Monitor |
Case | Antec Three Hundred |
Audio Device(s) | Asus Xonar DS |
Power Supply | Solid Gear Neutron 750 watt |
Software | Windows Vista Ultimate 64 bit |
As Far As Clock Speed Goes
I think it is a way to save a whole bunch of money and avoid unnecessary warranty claims. The card already has 3200 shaders and whether or not AMD/ATI clocked the chip higher would not offer significant gains to almost any gamer at any resolution. I believe it is a logical business decision based on simple math. The card is so damn fast that if they underclock it a bit to avoid almost any cooling issues and power consumption issues then offer headroom for tweakers who realize they can't RMA it if it explodes then it is a win situation for everybody.
I think it is a way to save a whole bunch of money and avoid unnecessary warranty claims. The card already has 3200 shaders and whether or not AMD/ATI clocked the chip higher would not offer significant gains to almost any gamer at any resolution. I believe it is a logical business decision based on simple math. The card is so damn fast that if they underclock it a bit to avoid almost any cooling issues and power consumption issues then offer headroom for tweakers who realize they can't RMA it if it explodes then it is a win situation for everybody.