**edit**
I now see where some confusion may have crept in, I misread post #63 in my response to it at #64.
In earlier posts you said barbs extending from the rad are plastic, I thought you were saying the same thing at #63.
But the basis for your claims of an inferior product had already shifted to "thinner hoses/fittings"...
So understandably you were irritated at #69 after you read my response talking about plastic barbs.
**edit**
So now you're saying it's more to do with the diam, not that the Eco's barbs are plastic?
I have actually tried to compare hose width from photos alone, but I can't see a marked difference.
It looks like the Eco might be slightly thinner, but how that affects the total package I've no idea.
I don't think anyone could know, engineer or not, do you?
If you have an engineering background in a similar area...
Rather than be condescending, why not explain what you understand that I don't?
(its pretty basic, look at the diam of the fittings/hoses on the coolers in question)
Yes as I said, slightly thinner fittings/hoses
I think, so what?
What are you trying to say; "Thinner hoses, so worse cooler"?
Isn't that overly simplistic?
I know thick hoses can be important, but that's only one part of the equation.
How can you deduce that it's better based on that alone?
I don't even know for sure if they are thinner, I've not found any measurements yet.
And I don't know the dimensions of it's other components either.
If there's schematics/measurements that demonstrate why most components of the H50
are better, then lay em out.
It's still prolly pointless until we've just got the darn things 'side-by-side'.
Even then, in certain scenarios one may be slightly better than the other, & vice versa.