- Joined
- Jun 20, 2007
- Messages
- 3,942 (0.62/day)
System Name | Widow |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7600x |
Motherboard | AsRock B650 HDVM.2 |
Cooling | CPU : Corsair Hydro XC7 }{ GPU: EK FC 1080 via Magicool 360 III PRO > Photon 170 (D5) |
Memory | 32GB Gskill Flare X5 |
Video Card(s) | GTX 1080 TI |
Storage | Samsung 9series NVM 2TB and Rust |
Display(s) | Predator X34P/Tempest X270OC @ 120hz / LG W3000h |
Case | Fractal Define S [Antec Skeleton hanging in hall of fame] |
Audio Device(s) | Asus Xonar Xense with AKG K612 cans on Monacor SA-100 |
Power Supply | Seasonic X-850 |
Mouse | Razer Naga 2014 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | FFXIV ARR Benchmark 12,883 on i7 2600k 15,098 on AM5 7600x |
That is rather pessimistic. Watercooling and overclocking three cards would yield much higher frames and higher benches. Four has no relevance unless you are folding. People that like to spend large sums of money care about performance too. There are always the ignorant too. Like those who buy a 5970 to run one 1680x1050 LCD.
Maybe four has no relevance, but then neither does three, or even possibly two for 90% of 3d applications currently available. But I would imagine anyone bothering to use more than two 480s, would be aimed more or less at number and performance crunching, which would of course include 3dMark, other synthetics/folding etc.
Either way, you'd have to over volt the cards to enable overclocking that returns any significant or noticeable performance difference, and then you'd be resorting to better cooling.
But how exactly do you fit full face water blocks onto multiple GPUs that are slotted in each adjacent PCI-E lane?
That would be a seriously long motherboard.