• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Acer Designs Aspire One Netbook With Low-Wattage AMD Processor

Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
471 (0.08/day)
System Name AMD Black Dragon
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory 4GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum (2x2GB)
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD4870 512MB GDDR5 w AC Twin Turbo
Storage Crucial C300 64GB SSD, 500GB and 2TB Drives
Display(s) Samsung 2494hm, Dell (Samsung?) 1907FP
Case Lancool (Lian-Li on a budget) K7
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC889A, M-Audio Fast Tracks
Power Supply OCZ Mod-X-Stream Pro 600W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium x64, XP Pro
The biggest problem is that WE understand clock per clock performance and comparing Atom to K10 is like comparing apples to donkeys. But the average Joe doesn't understand this one bit. So when they see 1.2GHZ they are simply going to dismiss it and go right to the 1.6GHZ spec. I see this happen all the time.

I think AMD should have targeted 1.6GHZ just for public image! But I'm glad to finally see an Intel alternative. DDR3 and the IGP should blow away the Intel chipset.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
1,077 (0.19/day)
Location
Porto
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro
Cooling AiO 240mm
Memory 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast 3600MHz CL18
Video Card(s) Radeon RX 6900XT Reference (amd.com)
Storage O.S.: 256GB SATA | 2x 1TB SanDisk SSD SATA Data | Games: 1TB Samsung 970 Evo
Display(s) LG 34" UWQHD
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeMusic + Gigaworks SB750 7.1 THX
Power Supply XFX 850W
Mouse Logitech G502 Wireless
VR HMD Lenovo Explorer
Software Windows 10 64bit
The biggest problem is that WE understand clock per clock performance and comparing Atom to K10 is like comparing apples to donkeys. But the average Joe doesn't understand this one bit. So when they see 1.2GHZ they are simply going to dismiss it. I see this happen all the time.

I think AMD should have targeted 1.6GHZ just for public image! But I'm glad to finally see an Intel alternative.

The Average Joe will ask:
- Will it do the Internets?
- Will it do office?
- Will it play videos and music?
- Will it play games?


Clock speed isn't really important for the Average Joe nowadays.
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
471 (0.08/day)
System Name AMD Black Dragon
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory 4GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum (2x2GB)
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD4870 512MB GDDR5 w AC Twin Turbo
Storage Crucial C300 64GB SSD, 500GB and 2TB Drives
Display(s) Samsung 2494hm, Dell (Samsung?) 1907FP
Case Lancool (Lian-Li on a budget) K7
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC889A, M-Audio Fast Tracks
Power Supply OCZ Mod-X-Stream Pro 600W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium x64, XP Pro
I beg to differ only because I sell this hardware on a daily basis. I've seen this with netbooks already. Intel doesn't advertise clock speeds right out in front with the Atoms witch of course makes some sense. But when Joe is looking at them they will almost always ask me what the clock speed is. They know clock speed as the only way to judge speed.

I can guarantee you when we get these in stock a few customers are going to ask what the clock speed is and as soon as "1.3" comes out of my mouth they are going to start to doubt it.

Same thing happens with names. Like Sempron. The new AM3 semprons are amazing. They will outgun the single core Athlons they replaced. But when people come in they ask for the "cheap single core AMD CPU" and I say "here it is the 2.7GHZ Single Core" and it's all good until they look at the box and I hear them murmur "Sempron?" and sometimes they give it right back. I'm like "oh boy" if only they knew. They want the older Athlon LE1660's or whatever. I know the Sempron is better and it doesn't have anything in common with Semprons of the past. But as soon as they see "Sempron" it's all over.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,946 (0.63/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Moral of the story: People are retarded and must be told what to do at all times.

/thread


:D
 
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
5,251 (0.88/day)
System Name [Daily Driver]
Processor [Ryzen 7 5800X3D]
Motherboard [MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK]
Cooling [be quiet! Dark Rock Slim]
Memory [64GB Crucial Pro 3200MHz (32GBx2)]
Video Card(s) [PNY RTX 3070Ti XLR8]
Storage [1TB SN850 NVMe, 4TB 990 Pro NVMe, 2TB 870 EVO SSD, 2TB SA510 SSD]
Display(s) [2x 27" HP X27q at 1440p]
Case [Fractal Meshify-C]
Audio Device(s) [Fanmusic TRUTHEAR IEM, HyperX Duocast]
Power Supply [CORSAIR RMx 1000]
Mouse [Logitech G Pro Wireless]
Keyboard [Logitech G512 Carbon (GX-Brown)]
Software [Windows 11 64-Bit]
ill take an atom... it does everything u need a netbook to do, with better battery life.
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
471 (0.08/day)
System Name AMD Black Dragon
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory 4GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum (2x2GB)
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD4870 512MB GDDR5 w AC Twin Turbo
Storage Crucial C300 64GB SSD, 500GB and 2TB Drives
Display(s) Samsung 2494hm, Dell (Samsung?) 1907FP
Case Lancool (Lian-Li on a budget) K7
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC889A, M-Audio Fast Tracks
Power Supply OCZ Mod-X-Stream Pro 600W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium x64, XP Pro
How do you know the battery life is better? They aren't even out yet.
 
Top