- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,686 (0.77/day)
System Name | Obelisc |
---|---|
Processor | i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z77-V |
Cooling | H110 |
Memory | 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31 |
Video Card(s) | GTX 780 Ti |
Storage | 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba |
Case | T81 |
Audio Device(s) | X-Fi Titanium HD |
Power Supply | EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM |
Software | Win10 64bit |
Seems consistent, but I'm not sure how accurate that is. Above average workloads (not 3d) up cpu temp much more than 4-5c. More like 15-20c. If this is accurate then that would mean chipset/ram is 75% of a cpu's load heat. Is that really the case? Or are you just not putting much heat into the faux cpu? Especially wondering if that would be true given how many cooler tests are on open well ventilated benches that I'd assume would close that gap if that were the cause of the heat, which they don't.
If it's not pushing the coolers realistically in the load tests then that makes the rankings inaccurate, as we've seen before the performance gap between coolers really only shows up at higher heat loads. Push the average into the 80s and new gaps start showing up, push the average into the 90s and gaps that were slight before become hugely exaggerated. This is why I've always felt we need 3 speed tests, stock, average overclock, then something high but achievable by an enthusiast for 24/7 (like 4.2-4.4).
And I wouldn't just automatically assume a manufacture is afraid of your testing method because it's so great, they may very well be avoiding it because it isn't.
If it's not pushing the coolers realistically in the load tests then that makes the rankings inaccurate, as we've seen before the performance gap between coolers really only shows up at higher heat loads. Push the average into the 80s and new gaps start showing up, push the average into the 90s and gaps that were slight before become hugely exaggerated. This is why I've always felt we need 3 speed tests, stock, average overclock, then something high but achievable by an enthusiast for 24/7 (like 4.2-4.4).
And I wouldn't just automatically assume a manufacture is afraid of your testing method because it's so great, they may very well be avoiding it because it isn't.