- Joined
- Jun 24, 2008
- Messages
- 88 (0.01/day)
- Location
- Garland, TX
Processor | Intel i5-11600K |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock H570M Pro4 |
Cooling | Thermalright Assassin King 120 |
Memory | 32GB (2x16GB) Silicon Power Zenith DDR4 3200 @ DDR4 3600 C16 |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC 8GB |
Storage | PNY CS3140 1TB PCIe 4.0 |
Display(s) | Dell P2422HE 24" @ 75Hz |
Case | Fractal Core 3000 USB 3.0 |
Audio Device(s) | Creative T20 Series II |
Power Supply | EVGA 650 GQ 80+ Gold |
Keyboard | Redragon K589 |
Benchmark Scores | https://www.3dmark.com/spy/33021442 |
No. Performance will most likely be exactly the same as all other USB 2.0 devices when used as a 2.0 device. USB 2.0 is the limiting factor here. Most hardware can exceed 2.0 speeds, but since that's the interface all flash drives use, they all are subjected to the same bottleneck.
That's not exactly true... No USB2.0 flash drive is the same. Go try a Corsair Flash Voyager GTR, then try a Kingston DataTraveler and let me know if you think the performance of those two are anything even CLOSE to each other. The USB2.0 interface is NOT the bottleneck here.