Yeah, but without the boards, the processors are useless. Every LGA1155 board uses that faulty chipset today. So the entire platform is hit because there's no alternative chipset provider.
I have to agree with you, there's no point in continuing to sell processors if all the mobos in the channel have this defect.
Although I love my SB system (I'm yet to see any performance degradation
), and I appreciate Intel's sincerity and the fact that it looks that they're willing to do anything to solve this problem and please their costumers, there's no denying that Intel wouldn't be in this position if manufacturers like VIA, SiS, Nvidia and even Ati weren't out of the Intel chipset business.
Even though some chipsets from those manufacturers were not as fast as Intel chipsets, there would have been a backup platform for SB CPUs.
Now the damage is done, and this has marred what would've otherwise been, one of the most successful hardware launches in recent history.
And even though SB procs are perfectly fine, and the bug itself isn't as crippling as most ppl are trying to make it sound, the fact that SB sales have effectively ended for the time being (both mobos and CPUs) could have been prevented if there were more chipset manufacturers giving ppl different choices to enjoy this new architecture.
In the pc world everyone is always an early adopter of something or another. Unless you only ever buy year old used parts for your upgrades.
Yes, this is the price to pay if you want to be in the bleeding edge of technology, I mean, C'mon, I bet that if ppl saying they are glad they weren't guinea pigs for Intel's new procs would've been offered a free upgrade to a SB system, most of them would've gladly accepted it