• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Thunderbolt Successor to Boast of 50 Gbps Bandwidth

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,297 (7.53/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
For the greater part of the last decade, PC device connectivity was limited to the 480 Mbps bandwidth of USB 2.0. The pressing need for more bandwidth to run external hard drives and disk racks was alleviated by eSATA, but eSATA lacked the versatility of USB. After quite some delay, came the next big version of USB, the USB 3.0 SuperSpeed, with its massive 5 Gbps bandwidth, plenty for fast and capacious flash drives, and external storage devices.

There was, however, a potential bottleneck lurking with running SSD-based RAID boxes in USB 3.0, as many SATA 6 Gbps SSDs are getting close to the bandwidth limit of USB 3.0. There has also been the need for an interconnect faster than USB 3.0 for high-bandwidth applications such as lossless ultra high definition video streaming in professional environments, and hence came Thunderbolt, which is a copper-electric variant of a fiber-optic interconnect Intel had been working on, codenamed Light Peak. The successor to Thunderbolt is reportedly already under development at Intel Labs.

Thunderbolt delivers 10 Gbps of bandwidth over copper wire, but there's no guaranteeing its market longevity with the ever-increasing demand for bandwidth with applications in the future. As early as 2015, Intel will have developed a new device interconnect standard to replace Thunderbolt. The new interconnect will be able to deliver a [currently] mind-boggling bandwidth of 50 Gbps over distances as long as 100 m. The announcement came from Jeff Demain, strategy director of circuits and system research at Intel Labs, at a company event in New York.

Thunderbolt is able to make use of its 10 Gbps bandwidth to drive high-bandwidth video encoding applications in environments with external storage, as well as connect high-resolution displays over the DisplayPort protocol. The future 50 Gbps interconnect will build on Thunderbolt's applications by upscaling the bandwidth. There is, however, no definitive word on whether the future interconnect will maintain any kind of compatibility with Thunderbolt. "We see them as complementary. It's the evolution of these connectors and protocols as they move forward," Demain said.

It is likely that Intel will have developed silicon photonics to a greater degree by 2015. At least it should be able to put optical transmitter and receiver into a single chip, small enough to be fitted into smartphones and tablets.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:

Over_Lord

News Editor
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
764 (0.15/day)
Location
Hyderabad
System Name BAH! - - tHE ECo FReAK
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 1.15V
Motherboard ASUS 785G EVO
Cooling Stock
Memory Corsair Titanium 4GB DDR3 1600MHz C9
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD5850 @ 1.049v
Storage Seagate 7200.12 500GB
Display(s) BenQ G2220HD
Case Cooler Master Elite 334
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VX550W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
nobody will pay for a 300$ processor to use your lousy thunderbolt..

apple mac fanbois to death
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
2,644 (0.45/day)
Location
...
System Name MRCOMP!
Processor 5800X3D
Motherboard MSI Gaming Plus
Cooling Corsair 280 AIO
Memory 64GB 3600mhz
Video Card(s) GTX3060
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) Samsung Neo
Case No Case... just sitting on cardboard :D
Power Supply Antec 650w
nobody will pay for a 300$ processor to use your lousy thunderbolt..

apple mac fanbois to death

$300? thats very cheap to anyone who would need this kind of speed..... your argument is invalid, plenty of people would pay more.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Messages
1,132 (0.18/day)
System Name Grandpa
Processor i5 4690K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97X-UD5H-BK
Cooling water
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence 2400MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 5850 x2
Storage Samsung SM951
Display(s) Catleap 27"
Case coolermaster stacker
Power Supply corsair AX860i
Mouse logitech g5 original
Keyboard Ducky
Software Windows 8.1
nobody will pay for a 300$ processor to use your lousy thunderbolt..

apple mac fanbois to death

WTF you talkin about?

On topic : sounds very appealing and I'd love to see those sort of speeds sooner.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,686 (0.77/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
nobody will pay for a 300$ processor to use your lousy thunderbolt..

apple mac fanbois to death

It's like you said the most random thing you could think of. People will pay $300 for an Intel cpu because of it's performance, whether it has thunderbolt or not is irrelevant. Having it certainly doesn't hurt anything.

More on topic, does anyone know if this has the latency response to replace sata? Cause even sata 6 woefully slow. We're only a few ssd gens away from a 10x speed bump and sata specifications are updated far too infrequently.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
I thought Light Peak was supposed to be on the market this year. Instead, we got copper-based Thunderbolt. Now Intel is saying we have to wait until 2015 for Light Peak and there's no promises even that will be fiber. I was getting all excited over the possibility of fiber taking over as the primary system interconnect and now, we're pretty much talking about an improved CAT7a networking cable which has already been done. How disappointing.

I think I'll file Light Peak in the same pile as Larrabee. Big on talk: short on delivery.
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
746 (0.12/day)
What I hate about these new technologies is just how LONG it all takes for these damn things to be implemented. I needed this YESTERDAY, Intel! Let's get it going already! :mad:
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
921 (0.16/day)
Location
SouthERN Africa
System Name inferKNIGHT
Processor Intel Core i5-4590
Motherboard MSI Z97i Gaming AC
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 2 x 4GB DDR3-1866 Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer (R/G)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 STRIX 3.5GB (+0.5GB? o.O)
Storage 1 x 256GB Cricial M550, 1 x 2TB Samsung 7200.12
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T260
Case Corsair Obsidian 250D
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1.1 pro x64
Despite it's "electric shock" symbol, it doesn't look like T/Bolt (or at least the 50Gbps one) will deliver power across the cable since it's fibre. Seems like T/Bolt will be relavent to data-only links.
In that case USB & Ethernet (with PoE) will remain quite relavent because of their ability to power the device across the cable.

OT: Looks like Intel is with the illuminati, LOL!:roll:
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,723 (0.43/day)
Processor i5-7600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Pro4
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO w/ AC MX-4
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 Corsair LPX Vengeance 15-15-15-36
Video Card(s) MSI Twin Frozr 1070ti
Storage 240GB Corsair Force GT
Display(s) 23' Dell AW2310
Case Corsair 550D
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
I think I'll keep my portable USB 3 external HDD, but thanks though Intel for trying new things and getting the industry to think about innovation!! I'll wait until Light Peak comes out, USB 3 more than suits my needs for now.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,297 (7.53/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,297 (7.53/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
How long did USB 2.0 last after SATA passed it in speed...

Very, very long. Blame whoever was behind USB 3.0 for it. The fact that eSATA came to be shows that the gap between USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 was a failure, and does not in any way validate USB 3.0 having the same amount of market time.
 
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
4,966 (0.87/day)
System Name i7-PC / HTPC / iMac
Processor i7 3820 / Phenom II 940
Motherboard GIGABYTE G1.ASSASSIN2 / M3A79-T Deluxe
Cooling Corsair Hydro H100i / Scythe II (HS only)
Memory G.SKILL Trident X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1600mhz / 4GB DDR2 1066 (@800) Corsair Dominator
Video Card(s) GB Radeon HD 7950s 3GB / GB Radeon HD 7950s 3GB
Storage 2x 80GB Intel X-25, 2x600gb SATA, 1x1tb 5400RPM storage /1x600GB, 3x500GB,1x160,1x120 SATA
Display(s) 1x 27" Yamakasi / Vizio 42" HDTV
Case Lian Li Lancool PC-K58 / Antec 900
Audio Device(s) HT Omega Striker 7.1 / Onboard and HDMI from ATi Card
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750W / 610W
Software Ubuntu / Windows 8.1 Pro / OS X / PHPStorm / Gaming
How long did USB 2.0 last after SATA passed it in speed...

yeah but usb is used almost exclusively externally, whereas sata is almost exclusively internal.
even esata isn't used for anything other than storage. they catered to different segments so
it's no wonder usb stuck around.

speed is not the most important factor believe it or not. overhead, component cost, market
ubiquity. simply being around long enough allows a technology to become (a) standard.

Very, very long. Blame whoever was behind USB 3.0 for it. The fact that eSATA came to be shows that the gap between USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 was a failure, and does not in any way validate USB 3.0 having the same amount of market time.

you're talking as though usb 2.0 is not sufficient in speed for 90% of users, which it still is.
sure faster is better, but most people don't care. the majority of consumers will look at
2.0-3.0 as a worthless upgrade, especially until devices start making use of it. then they
have to buy new external devices, to gain ANY benefit from 3.0... I know you are the
resident hardware dude... but i don't think 2.0 is so far over-extended, except in a strictly
technological sense.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,297 (7.53/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
you're talking as though usb 2.0 is not sufficient in speed for 90% of users, which it still is.
USB 2.0 is insufficient speed for 99.99% of users who are using it for any form of data transfer. It has sufficient bandwidth for most other applications (such as driving printers/scanners/input devices).
 
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
4,966 (0.87/day)
System Name i7-PC / HTPC / iMac
Processor i7 3820 / Phenom II 940
Motherboard GIGABYTE G1.ASSASSIN2 / M3A79-T Deluxe
Cooling Corsair Hydro H100i / Scythe II (HS only)
Memory G.SKILL Trident X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1600mhz / 4GB DDR2 1066 (@800) Corsair Dominator
Video Card(s) GB Radeon HD 7950s 3GB / GB Radeon HD 7950s 3GB
Storage 2x 80GB Intel X-25, 2x600gb SATA, 1x1tb 5400RPM storage /1x600GB, 3x500GB,1x160,1x120 SATA
Display(s) 1x 27" Yamakasi / Vizio 42" HDTV
Case Lian Li Lancool PC-K58 / Antec 900
Audio Device(s) HT Omega Striker 7.1 / Onboard and HDMI from ATi Card
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750W / 610W
Software Ubuntu / Windows 8.1 Pro / OS X / PHPStorm / Gaming
USB 2.0 is insufficient speed for 99.99% of users who are using it for any form of data transfer. It has sufficient bandwidth for most other applications (such as driving printers/scanners/input devices).

agreed there personally - not for the percentage.

if it were measured by what is possible, yes it's inordinately slow. but i highly doubt 99% of
users/consumers are using their usb 2.0 hard drives, and being put off by the speed. i'm sure
they'd be happy with faster, but insufficient to me means being to poor for use, which i don't
agree that it is for most users.

i don't think they think much about it, it just is.
 

v12dock

Block Caption of Rainey Street
Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
1,980 (0.34/day)
Very, very long. Blame whoever was behind USB 3.0 for it. The fact that eSATA came to be shows that the gap between USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 was a failure, and does not in any way validate USB 3.0 having the same amount of market time.

But how many people needed transfer over 40MB/s back in 2003 onto an external device
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,297 (7.53/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
agreed there personally - not for the percentage.

if it were measured by what is possible, yes it's inordinately slow. but i highly doubt 99% of
users/consumers are using their usb 2.0 hard drives, and being put off by the speed. i'm sure
they'd be happy with faster, but insufficient to me means being to poor for use, which i don't
agree that it is for most users. i don't think they think much about it, it just is.

99% is a safe bet figure for the percentage of external storage devices (flash drives, external hard drives) that use USB 2.0, and hence have insufficient amount of bandwidth. USB 2.0 gives you a measly 60-odd MB/s bandwidth, which is circa 1996 (when IDE with UDMA-3 gave you 66 MB/s).

It took too long before USB 3.0 came to be, and established some sort of parity with internal storage standard prvealent for the day. (USB 3.0 and SATA 6 Gbps).

But how many people needed transfer over 40MB/s back in 2003 onto an external device

I don't know, but certainly a LOT of people needed to transfer over 40 MB/s in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 (when there was still no USB 3.0 in sight, and when hard drives would easily cross 100 MB/s).
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,162 (0.20/day)
Location
I live in Norway
Processor R9 5800x3d | R7 3900X | 4800H | 2x Xeon gold 6142
Motherboard Asrock X570M | AB350M Pro 4 | Asus Tuf A15
Cooling Air | Air | duh laptop
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX @3600 CL16 | 128gb | 32GB | 192gb
Video Card(s) RTX 4080 |Quadro P5000 | RTX2060M
Storage Many drives
Display(s) AW3423dwf.
Case Jonsbo D41
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse g502 Lightspeed
Keyboard G913 tkl
Software win11, proxmox
Very, very long. Blame whoever was behind USB 3.0 for it. The fact that eSATA came to be shows that the gap between USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 was a failure, and does not in any way validate USB 3.0 having the same amount of market time.

Intel was the leader of usb3 that everyone just went away from and made their own if i remember right, but intel is the one to blame, to make sure its not adopted widely for use of thunderbolt ?

who knows, intel breaks and makes
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
921 (0.16/day)
Location
SouthERN Africa
System Name inferKNIGHT
Processor Intel Core i5-4590
Motherboard MSI Z97i Gaming AC
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 2 x 4GB DDR3-1866 Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer (R/G)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 STRIX 3.5GB (+0.5GB? o.O)
Storage 1 x 256GB Cricial M550, 1 x 2TB Samsung 7200.12
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T260
Case Corsair Obsidian 250D
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1.1 pro x64
Thunderbolt is an electric cable, not optic.

Are you talking about the current itteration or the 50Gbps one to come?
I'm referring to the latter.
 
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
4,966 (0.87/day)
System Name i7-PC / HTPC / iMac
Processor i7 3820 / Phenom II 940
Motherboard GIGABYTE G1.ASSASSIN2 / M3A79-T Deluxe
Cooling Corsair Hydro H100i / Scythe II (HS only)
Memory G.SKILL Trident X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1600mhz / 4GB DDR2 1066 (@800) Corsair Dominator
Video Card(s) GB Radeon HD 7950s 3GB / GB Radeon HD 7950s 3GB
Storage 2x 80GB Intel X-25, 2x600gb SATA, 1x1tb 5400RPM storage /1x600GB, 3x500GB,1x160,1x120 SATA
Display(s) 1x 27" Yamakasi / Vizio 42" HDTV
Case Lian Li Lancool PC-K58 / Antec 900
Audio Device(s) HT Omega Striker 7.1 / Onboard and HDMI from ATi Card
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750W / 610W
Software Ubuntu / Windows 8.1 Pro / OS X / PHPStorm / Gaming
Are you talking about the current itteration or the 50Gbps one to come?
I'm referring to the latter.

well i assume the one to come will have a different name, no?
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
921 (0.16/day)
Location
SouthERN Africa
System Name inferKNIGHT
Processor Intel Core i5-4590
Motherboard MSI Z97i Gaming AC
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 2 x 4GB DDR3-1866 Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer (R/G)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 STRIX 3.5GB (+0.5GB? o.O)
Storage 1 x 256GB Cricial M550, 1 x 2TB Samsung 7200.12
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T260
Case Corsair Obsidian 250D
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1.1 pro x64
well i assume the one to come will have a different name, no?

Well, based on FordGT90Concept's comment, I was assuming it's one and the same, with the current itteration merely being a improvisation and the Light Peak being the true Thunderbolt?
 
D

Deleted member 24505

Guest
It seriously makes me laugh when i see 2TB usb2 drives, how long would it take to dump a TB of stuff on it, at least an hour i reckon. Usb2 is now only for peripherals and not usb hdds. Now a usb3 external hdd thats a differant matter :)
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,162 (0.20/day)
Location
I live in Norway
Processor R9 5800x3d | R7 3900X | 4800H | 2x Xeon gold 6142
Motherboard Asrock X570M | AB350M Pro 4 | Asus Tuf A15
Cooling Air | Air | duh laptop
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX @3600 CL16 | 128gb | 32GB | 192gb
Video Card(s) RTX 4080 |Quadro P5000 | RTX2060M
Storage Many drives
Display(s) AW3423dwf.
Case Jonsbo D41
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse g502 Lightspeed
Keyboard G913 tkl
Software win11, proxmox
It seriously makes me laugh when i see 2TB usb2 drives, how long would it take to dump a TB of stuff on it, at least an hour i reckon. Usb2 is now only for peripherals and not usb hdds. Now a usb3 external hdd thats a differant matter :)

we were already at usb2 limits in 2001 I think, I'm pretty sure my two 45gb ibm bombtimers did those speeds.
 

Over_Lord

News Editor
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
764 (0.15/day)
Location
Hyderabad
System Name BAH! - - tHE ECo FReAK
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 1.15V
Motherboard ASUS 785G EVO
Cooling Stock
Memory Corsair Titanium 4GB DDR3 1600MHz C9
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD5850 @ 1.049v
Storage Seagate 7200.12 500GB
Display(s) BenQ G2220HD
Case Cooler Master Elite 334
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VX550W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
LOL I was just trolling, like

"I'm 1st to comment" and "Intel your pricing Sucks" kinda post..

but ended up with random non-sensical gibberish..

what really made my day was reading you guys reply, top class +1000
 
Top