• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Trinity Detailed Further, Compatible with A75 Chipset

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,171 (7.56/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD detailed its upcoming "Virgo" PC platform that consists of next-generation "Trinity" APU (accelerated processing unit), and current-generation AMD A75 "Hudson-D" chipset. A notable revelation here is that the next-gen APUs will be compatible with AMD A75, although it will be designed for a new socket called FM2. It remains to be seen if FM1 and FM2 are pin-compatible.

"Trinity" packs four x86-64 cores based on the next-generation "Piledriver" architecture, arranged in two Piledriver modules. A module is a closely-knit group of two cores, with certain shared and dedicated resources. Each Piledriver module has 2 MB of L2 cache shared between the two cores. In all, Trinity, with its two modules, has 4 MB of L2 cache without any L3 cache.



AMD is talking about a 20% performance improvement over current-generation "Llano" APUs, which use K10 "Stars" architecture cores. Trinity will feature 3rd-generation TurboCore technology that adds a few new power-management and selective overclocking features.

The integrated memory controller will get an overhaul, too. Unlike with K10-based processors that have two independent 64-bit wide memory interfaces that can be configured to work ganged or unganged, Trinity will have a single 128-bit memory interface, the controller will support dual-channel DDR3-2133 MHz memory standard, with DRAM voltages of under 1.5V. Trinity will include a 24-lane PCI-Express root complex, it supports 2-way multi-GPU configurations.

Moving on to the integrated GPU component, AMD promises a 30% performance improvement over Llano's iGPU. The GPU component is DirectX 11 compliant, and features UVD 3 hardware HD video acceleration, with SAMU and native VCE. Featuring AMD Eyefinity technology, this integrated GPU will support up to three displays without needing a discrete graphics card. Eyefinity can be used to step up productivity.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
6,824 (1.23/day)
Location
Viking Land
System Name CosmosII
Processor Ryzen 7700
Motherboard Gigabyte b650 gaming x ax v2
Cooling BeQuiet Pure Rock v2
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB
Video Card(s) Inno3d RTX 4070 Ti Super
Storage 1tb Corsair MP600 Pro XT
Display(s) 34" Ultrawide
Case Cosmos II
Audio Device(s) stock onboard thing
Power Supply RM850E
Software ½½
will this be like a BD with integrated gpu ? bc then they might aswell not even release that thing
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
1,618 (0.30/day)
Location
Azalea City
System Name Main
Processor Ryzen 5950x
Motherboard B550 PG Velocita
Cooling Water
Memory Ballistix
Video Card(s) RX 6900XT
Storage T-FORCE CARDEA A440 PRO
Display(s) MAG401QR
Case QUBE 500
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z623
Power Supply LEADEX V 1KW
Mouse Cooler Master MM710
Keyboard Huntsman Elite
Software 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/user/damric/
will this be like a BD with integrated gpu ? bc then they might aswell not even release that thing

I'm sure it will be popular. FX 8150 and 8120 are sold out at the major etailers, and llano cannot keep up with demands.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
191 (0.03/day)
System Name "the strong silent type"
Processor i5 3570k
Motherboard Asus Maximus V Gene
Cooling Thermalright Archon
Memory G.Skill RipjawsX D3 8GB 1866-899 RipjawsX K2 GSK
Video Card(s) XFX 6950 1GB dualfan
Storage Crucial M4 128GB / Samsung F3 HD103SJ 1TB
Display(s) LG W2253V
Case CM 690 II Advanced
Power Supply Coolermaster Silent Pro Gold 600w
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit
I can't wait for this to come to the market.

I think the future of AMD is staked at their capacity to succesfully mass produce this APU with proper yields.

While bulldozer isnt kicking I7 butt, piledriver with a 7xxx GPU will blow away anything intel has to offer as system on a chip. Thus any laptop with an intel GPU completely out of the water.

This could (and should) be the future of any low/medium end laptop at a very affordable price.

But again everything hangs on if they can succesfully mass produce it with nice profit margines. (and a decent TDP)
 

Fx

Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
1,332 (0.23/day)
Location
Portland, OR
Processor Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Noctua
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series 16GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) EVGA 980ti FTW
Storage (OS)Samsung 950 Pro (512GB), (Data) WD Reds
Display(s) 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser GAME ONE
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Deck Hassium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
this looks to be a good performer
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,356 (0.47/day)
Location
VT
Processor Intel i7-10700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Aurorus Ultra z490
Cooling Corsair H100i RGB
Memory 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200MHz
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming Trio X 3070 LHR
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q / AOC G2590FX
Case Corsair X4000 iCue
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
I'm sure it will be popular. FX 8150 and 8120 are sold out at the major etailers, and llano cannot keep up with demands.

Both situations exist because AMD cannot get enough chips out. They are actually that scarce. It's not like they are selling insane amounts of them, it's just AMD's supply is that limited due to bad yield from Glo-Fo, and their limited capacity.
 

KooKKiK

New Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
BD's performance per core is really bad, even worse than Phenom II.


How can they bring Trinity to 20% improvement over Llano ???
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,230 (0.24/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
BD's performance per core is really bad, even worse than Phenom II.


How can they bring Trinity to 20% improvement over Llano ???

Because Bulldozer is a 10% improvement over Phenom II but not in all workloads, the number is an average
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
4,015 (0.77/day)
Location
UK
System Name PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 3600
Motherboard MSI B450 Mortar Max
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC12DX, 3 x NZXT FN 140mm, 1x NZXT FV V2 120mm
Memory 32gb DDR4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS R9 290 DCII-OC 4GB
Storage corsair mp600 1TB
Display(s) LG 27MB85Z 27" 1440p
Case NZXT Source 340
Power Supply Thermaltake 675w
Mouse Logitech G500S
Keyboard Logitech G510S
Software Windows 8.1 64 bit
BD's performance per core is really bad, even worse than Phenom II.


How can they bring Trinity to 20% improvement over Llano ???

your forgetting most of the transistors in bulldozer weren't the actual processing cores(somewhere near 40-50% were taken up with it's massive amounts of cache, and i think only a 1/4 in the end were actual processors cores, the rest were memory and IO ETC), with such low cache compared to the desktop version they should be able to reduce the the power consumption without reducing the clockspeed too much like they normally do in mobile processors

EG:Llano mobile quad core was 1.4GHZ,AMD dual core was 1.9GHZ, seeing as these don't use a full 2 cores, but 2 half cores in a module, i think these bulldozer cores will be closer to 2GHZ
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,771 (0.95/day)
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name ---
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.00 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0, Hacked Bios F4.x
Cooling Silenx 4 pipe Tower cooler + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 3 x 120mm, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 16GB + Patriot Memory DDR3 1866 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage Inland 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD for OS, WDC Black - 2TB + 1TB Storage, Inland 480GB SSD - Games
Display(s) 3 x 1080P LCDs - Acer 25" + Acer 23" + HP 23"
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
another 'Look good on Paper'?

hmm may be AMD will improve with this like Phenom I to PII now?

AMD is just riding on the 'may be' factor!
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,768 (0.30/day)
System Name Lailalo
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X Boosts to 4.95Ghz
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus (WIFI
Cooling Noctua
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) XFX 7900XT 20GB
Storage Samsung 970 Pro Plus 1TB, Crucial 1TB MX500 SSD, Segate 3TB
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper
Power Supply XPG 1000W
Mouse G602
Keyboard G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
Yay thank you AMD for keeping some form of backwards compatibility!

Dunno how long it will last. But at least FM1 will have some upgrade options. MXM couldn't do it...couldn't make the upgradable GPU in a laptop popular, but AMD might be able to do it with APUs.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
499 (0.10/day)
System Name Multipurpose desktop
Processor AMD Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.75Ghz , NB @ 2.5
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 (rev 1.0)
Cooling Prolimatech Megahalems Rev. C, 2x120mm CM Blademaster
Memory Corsair Vengeance LP (4x4GB) @1666Mhz 9-9-9-20-24 1T
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix R7-370 4GB OC
Storage 2x WD Caviar Black 500GB Sata III in RAID 0
Display(s) Acer S211HL 21.5" 1920x1080
Case Cooler Master Centurion 534+, 3x 120mm CM Sickle Flow
Power Supply Seasonic X650 Gold
Software Windows 7 x64 Home Premium SP1
BD's performance per core is really bad, even worse than Phenom II.
How can they bring Trinity to 20% improvement over Llano ???

1) BD performance per core is equivalent to a Phenom II (fx-8150 vs x4 965)
2) They say that Piledriver will be a +10%/core boost over Bulldozer.
3) They say that the power efficiency problem will be fixed, so that the high clocks of the deep pipeline architecture can be taken advantage of more effectively. So, 4ghz+ stock clocks on Piledriver -- which also means higher per core performance.
4) Llano uses Athlon II cores.
5) It will have an updated, higher performance GPU
6) Llano uses an updated 5xxx GPU branded as an 65xx.

It's quite easy to see how they'll get a performance improvement. Since they don't give details on the comparisons, they can cherry pick whichever comparison they're making. Something vs some previous Llano configuration is a 20% improvement. OR In some particular benchmark, there is a 20% improvement.

If you don't get excruciating detail it's just an advertising statement with no references and no commitments.

[Assuming, of course, that the information from Donanimhaber is correct, and actually comes from AMD]
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
1,380 (0.28/day)
System Name Desktop
Processor Intel Xeon E5-1680v2
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth X79
Cooling Intel AIO
Memory 8x4GB DDR3 1866MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 970 SC
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB + 2x WD RE 4TB HDD
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Fractal Define XL Black
Audio Device(s) Schiit Modi Uber/Sony CDP-XA20ES/Pioneer CT-656>Sony TA-F630ESD>Sennheiser HD600
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
will this be like a BD with integrated gpu ? bc then they might aswell not even release that thing

This will be an APU based on the Piledriver core (revamped BD).

Because Bulldozer is a 10% improvement over Phenom II but not in all workloads, the number is an average

He was talking per core. Per core the Phenom II kills it (if there ever was an Phenom II X8 it would destroy the 8150. And let's not even start per clock...



1) BD performance per core is equivalent to a Phenom II (fx-8150 vs x4 965)


Per core it is not nearly the same, read above.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
9,899 (1.71/day)
Location
Essex, England
System Name My pc
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Rog b450-f
Cooling Cooler master 120mm aio
Memory 16gb ddr4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 3x 3070
Storage 2tb intel nvme and 2tb generic ssd
Display(s) Generic dell 1080p overclocked to 75hz
Case Phanteks enthoo
Power Supply 650w of borderline fire hazard
Mouse Some wierd Chinese vertical mouse
Keyboard Generic mechanical keyboard
Software Windows ten
will this be like a BD with integrated gpu ? bc then they might aswell not even release that thing

Well if AMD gets there way the gpu in the APU will take care of bulldozers week point.

(gpus are great at floating point calculations, which bulldozer is week at)
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
499 (0.07/day)
Who cares if the A75 chipset is reused if its not going to be pin-compatible with FM1?!?

I'm really happy I bought my A8-3850 CPU. My only want is for an unlocked multi.

No thx to BD.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.48/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
1) BD performance per core is equivalent to a Phenom II (fx-8150 vs x4 965)

I want what you are smoking.

http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx-8150--8120-6100-and-4100-performance-review/4

FX-4100 is on par with the PII X4 810 or A6-3650 at best, both 2.6 Ghz chips. Being a 3.6 Ghz chip it never gets close to the X4 975 BE of same clocks. Neither is close to the 3.4 Ghz X4 965 and even the FX-6100 often struggles to catch 3.6 Ghz ++ Phenom II's. Of course there's some niche tests where it gets close or even scores a pirric win, but those niche benchmarks are not the kind of tasks that a Fusion platform will ever be doing. BD is also a server chip, so server-like tasks it's where they don't completely suck, but there's no salvation for Trinity in that regards, so they really have to improve it over BD. Unless it's fast in home tasks, it will be fail from our perspective. They will still sell to the masses tho, probably, but that's because they are not concerned about efficiency, ROI, such things.

EDIT: I see that Piledriver is still going to use 2 MB of L2 per module. Am I the only one who thinks they would do much much better with a 1 MB, maybe even 512 KB L2 that is "a lot" (comnparatively) faster? Granted, we don't really know if BD cache is slow because of the massive amount of it or the cache size is what it is in order to try to compensate for the slow access. I really think it's the former, based on other AMD chips (and Intel's), but I'm not an enginner. Either way being things as they are for current BD, devoting almost 40% of die sze to cache seems like a total waste.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,267 (0.68/day)
Location
Sanford, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
Nice.

Put me down for three. The kids are getting older and tire of sharing a computer.
 

3volvedcombat

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
1,514 (0.27/day)
Location
South California, The desert.
System Name My Computer
Processor Core 2 Q9550 4Ghz 1.23volts
Motherboard Gigabyte
Cooling Corsair
Memory OCZ
Video Card(s) Galaxy
Storage Western Digital
Display(s) Acer
Case Lian li
Audio Device(s) Asus
Power Supply Corsiar
Software Microsoft
Benchmark Scores 25,000 3dmark06 at 4.35Ghz processor, 835core card!
will this be like a BD with integrated gpu ? bc then they might aswell not even release that thing

To be honest, quiet frankly, there just releasing a new gen discrete graphics to fill up the new gen line.

Second of all, it gets VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY DEPRESSING to only see performance increase numbers of 10-20% right now.

Come on AMD, release something worth releasing, they could have had opportunity to get some serious competition with Intel after x6thuban ect ect....

Bullshit 10-20% increase in performance numbers, yeah the probably will meet those paper launch numbers, but they have also set them selves up for failure if they possible don't even meet those paper launch numbers(which could be possible.)

I just want AMD to release something worth while, and stop pushing necessarily deformed baby's right out of there colon, and trying to make market on them.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,427 (0.65/day)
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 8 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Crucial MX100 SATA 2.5 SSD
Display(s) Lenovo ThinkVision 27" (LEN P27h-10)
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
I would like to see AMD push out a 8 core Thuban and up the L2 to 2MB/core and L3 cache to 8MB shared. We are already seeing the Thubans on the heels of the i5 and i7 in certain benchmarks already wouldnt it be more logical just to increase the cache and core count until they revise the Bulldozer.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
868 (0.16/day)
Location
Toronto, ON. Canada
System Name Gamers PC
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE @ 3.80 GHz
Motherboard MSI 790FX-GD70 AM3
Cooling Corsair H50 Cooler
Memory Corsair XMS3 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 5770 1GB GDDR5
Storage 2 x WD Caviar Green 1TB SATA300 w/64MB Buffer (RAID 0)
Display(s) Samsung 2494SW 1080p 24" WS LCD HD
Case CM HAF 932 Full Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-FI TITANIUM -PCIE x 1
Power Supply Corsair TX Series CMPSU-650TX (650W)
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
AMD needs to stop designing server CPU's for desktop.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,491 (0.21/day)
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor FX-8350 vishera
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+;1450/2000 Mhz
Storage SSD :840 pro 128 Gb;Iridium pro 240Gb ; HDD 2xWD-1Tb
Display(s) Benq XL2730Z 144 Hz freesync
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Riotoro Enigma G2 850W
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win10 64bit ltsc
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
another 'Look good on Paper'?

hmm may be AMD will improve with this like Phenom I to PII now?

AMD is just riding on the 'may be' factor!


m8 u don't read news? they have now "Papermaster" so it will be gooood
 
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
5,392 (0.95/day)
Location
Carrollton, GA
System Name ODIN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
Cooling Dark Rock 4
Memory G Skill RipjawsV F4 3600 Mhz C16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ventus 3X OC LHR
Storage Crucial 2 TB M.2 SSD :: WD Blue M.2 1TB SSD :: 1 TB WD Black VelociRaptor
Display(s) Dell S2716DG 27" 144 Hz G-SYNC
Case Fractal Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Onboard Audio
Power Supply Antec HCP 850 80+ Gold
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Lux
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores I don't benchmark.
Why did everyone overlook the standard memory frequency of 2133 MHz. If the memory speed scales like going from 1333 MHz to 1600 MHz we could see 15% performance just from the memory controller.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
1,238 (0.19/day)
Location
SoCal
Processor AMD Phenom II 1055T @ 3.6ghz 1.3V
Motherboard Asus M5A97 EVO
Cooling Xigmatek SD1284
Memory 2x4GB Patriot Sector 5 PC3-12800 @ 7-8-7-24-1T 1.7V
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 7950 DD @ 1100/1350 1.185V
Storage OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 2x7200.12 500GB Raid1
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 27" LCD 1440p @ 120hz
Case Cooler Master 690M
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Enermax Liberty 620W Eco Edition
Software Windows 7 Professional x64 / Ubuntu 12.04 x64
Why did everyone overlook the standard memory frequency of 2133 MHz. If the memory speed scales like going from 1333 MHz to 1600 MHz we could see 15% performance just from the memory controller.

Well, when using the IMC, Llano greatly benefits from higher RAM speeds. But benchmarks run without the IMC don't tend to have much of a difference. Also, with Bulldozer higher RAM speeds don't seem to make a huge difference, but we'll see about Piledriver.
 
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
376 (0.06/day)
Location
South Jersey
LOL I think you mean IGP. It would be pretty hard to run without hte Integrated Memory Controller :)

And yes that Graphics performance it waht improves most when running faster Mem.
 

Atom_Anti

New Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2007
Messages
176 (0.03/day)
Location
Captiva Isaland, Florida USA
System Name 3dfx High End PC
Processor Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz@3.7GHz
Motherboard Abit SA7
Cooling AC Freezer 4
Memory 512MB Patriot DDR600 TCCD
Video Card(s) 3dfx Voodoo 5 5500 AGP 193/193MHz
Storage 80GB 7200RPM Pata
Display(s) 19" LG Wide TFT-LCD
Case Cooler Master
Audio Device(s) integrated
Power Supply 400W
Software Windows Millenium Edition
Benchmark Scores 3DMark2000: 7100 3DMark2001: 4100
Will this also compatible with A70M laptop chipset?
 
Top