cdawall
where the hell are my stars
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Messages
- 27,680 (4.18/day)
- Location
- Houston
System Name | All the cores |
---|---|
Processor | 2990WX |
Motherboard | Asrock X399M |
Cooling | CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL |
Memory | 4x16GB G.Skill 3600 |
Video Card(s) | (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's |
Storage | 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB |
Display(s) | Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz |
Case | Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal |
Audio Device(s) | Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime 1200w |
Mouse | Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller |
Keyboard | Keychron K8 |
Software | W10P |
but its a semi pentium 4 slow un efficient u may call it that way
i.e. desined to run at highest chocks possible without taking in mind the ipcthat was the p 4 and now the bulldozer
Well this chip technically is not inefficient, it is not as efficient as the Intel offerings. It is however still a better CPU than the previous generations in certain aspects. IPC on these chips is still 4 the same as the intel offerings and up from 3 on the old chips and 2 on P4 "netburst".
It isn't a Bulldozer thread per se since we're talking about a 2-core, 2-threads CPU from AMD (which doesn't exist under the "Bulldozer" lineup).
No that little box still says "Bulldozer" the core is still a bulldozer core. This isn't any different than a rebadged Sargus core which is really just a Regor core tuned down.
And also don't forget this is on LN2 and not LHEI think 9GHz is close
![]()
You would be surprised how little gains they get from LN2 to LHe we will see larger gains moving from stepping to stepping as fab techniques improve. The same way the last batches of Phenom 1 clocked better and the last batches of Phenom II clocked better.