Intel Ivy Bridge Desktop Processor Models Tabled

[btarunr]

Russian website Overclockers.ru claims to have a complete picture of what Intel's upcoming 22 nm Core "Ivy Bridge" desktop (2012 Core Processor Family) looks like. The site compiled model names, extensions, clock speeds, Turbo Boost speeds, L3 cache sizes, and TDP ratings of as many as 18 models, most of which are quad-core.

The table reflects that most clock speeds are similar to today's Sandy Bridge LGA1155 processor models, some have Turbo Boost speeds as high as 3.90 GHz. Since Ivy Bridge silicon is an optical shrink of Sandy Bridge LGA1155, from 32 nm to 22 nm, and since Intel is using a more energy-efficient transistor design, there are significant improvements in TDP ratings.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site

 

[Deleted member 24505]

3570K for me please

 

[Jarman]

These will work in current p67 boards yes??

 

[radrok]

Yes they will but you won't be sure of the PCI express 3.0 support

 

[btarunr]

Extensions:

• K = unlocked BClk multiplier
• S = energy-efficient (while not compromising clock-speed)
• T = low-power (lower clock-speed/core-count)

 

[INSTG8R]

These will work in current p67 boards yes??

Yes as long as the Manufacturer has put out an updated BIOS for it. I know my P67 is Ivy Bridge ready. I know I am eyeballing that i7 3770K if the prices are right.

 

[Deleted member 24505]

Mine supported it with bios 902, and i don't care about pci-e 3, that can wait till my next board.

 

[Fourstaff]

It looks like IVB is gunning for power/perf rather than raw increase in performance. Anyone shares the same view?

 

[HalfAHertz]

Hmm I expected a bigger drop in power than this from the 22nm Tri-gate process :/ Scratch that - there's more l3 cache. Interesting

 

[the54thvoid]

Makes sense. They need to allow the performance to stay with the SB-E platform.

 

[qubit]

These look good. As they're an incremental improvement over SB, I hope they will be priced about the same.

I'll have the 8 thread i7-3770K to go, along with a side order of fries and ketchup.

It looks like IVB is gunning for power/perf rather than raw increase in performance. Anyone shares the same view?

Yes, that's true. When you consider the lack of competition from AMD and the fact that even a low end CPU can run most things including 3D games very well, it's not surprising.

 

[Zubasa]

It looks like IVB is gunning for power/perf rather than raw increase in performance. Anyone shares the same view?

Its not like they need to increase the performance, given the "competition" or the lack of.

 

[Completely Bonkers]

Error in table:
i5-3450S should be 65W

(I'm only pointing this out because it got me confused...)

There might also be a i5-3450T at 45W... who knows.

 

[loleafidas]

Intel, pls dun cost me X79 for nothing, Bulldozer costed Asus Crosshair V Formula is enough :-|

 

[de.das.dude]

why are they all soo low powered? even my 945 is 95W!

 

[Fourstaff]

why are they all soo low powered? even my 945 is 95W!

Die shrink + 3D gate + already low power S-B

 

[repman244]

These will be perfect for laptops, anyone knows if mobile versions will also be compatible with current laptop sockets?

 

[ensabrenoir]

.......no way around it I'm building 2 new machines....thanks a lot intel

An Ivy bridge e would be more palletable than sbe though

 

[MikeMurphy]

This table is screwy and must be fake.

1) Only a single dual-core option? Dual core CPUs is where Intel makes most of their profits. Its not like most consumers really need 4 cores.

2) Similarly, why so many more quad core options than with SB?

3) Fill out the rest of the table with what it *should* have suddenly you're talking about way too many chips

 

[afw]

release date ???

 

[afw]

This table is screwy and must be fake.

1) Only a single dual-core option? Dual core CPUs is where Intel makes most of their profits. Its not like most consumers really need 4 cores.

2) Similarly, why so many more quad core options than with SB?

why not make quad-cores mainstream when mobile phones these days come with dual-cores (quad cores coming 2012 Q1) ...

earlier dual-cores were highend single cores were mainstream ... then dualcores were mainstream and quad-cores were highend ... catch the pattern ...

 

[de.das.dude]

hope fully more quads mean they will be "competitively priced"

 

[radrok]

There are more quad cores because they are getting into the dual core TDP range at which you can simply use them because the low TDP associated with the new lithography permits you to do so

 

[Sasqui]

What I find incredibly interesting is the TDP of different speeds with same core and cache is the same.

Taking the data at face value, does this mean that wattage is scaling non-linearly with core speed? Kind of hints that the K models will overclock like crazy. I hope so!

 

[btarunr]

release date ???

April 2012.