• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel SSD 520 Series SandForce-Driven, Launch Very Soon

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,306 (7.52/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Although Intel has its SSD 510 series to target the high-end client market segment, it's available in very few capacities, and is facing tough competition from "SandForce-Driven" SSDs (SSDs that use SandForce-made controllers). In 2012, Intel will give its SSD lineup a large-scale revamp, which includes the gradual replacement of SSD 510 series with new SSD 520 "Cherryville" series. Targeting the same high-end client segment, SSD 520 will be available in a wider variety of capacities that includes 60 GB, 120 GB, 180 GB, 240 GB, and 480 GB.

We are now getting to learn through a fresh report by TheSSDReview, the idea behind SSD 520: that Intel wants to use SandForce SSD processors. The new drives feature transfer rates of up to 550 MB/s reads, 520 MB/s writes, 70,000 IOPS 4K random write throughput, and overprovisioned capacities consistent with most SandForce-driven SATA 6 Gb/s SSDs in the market. SSD 520 should hence provide the best of both worlds: the trust Intel brand brings to the table with a possible secret-sauce firmware; and the high-performance of SandForce controllers. Intel's SSD 510 uses a Marvell-made controller, many of its previous generation SSDs have used its in-house SSD controllers. TheSSDReview reports that the launch of these drives is imminent.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.87/day)
I bet these will cost like 1500 EUR each if they want to properly balance the price against their Marvell based units. Otherwise they'd be spitting in their own bowl...
I hope i'm wrong and that these will be competitively priced against other SandForce driven units.
 

Completely Bonkers

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.39/day)
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
Did I read that correctly? Wow. I'm surprised Intel hasn't got the intel to do their own controllers. I wouldn't have believed it... if it werent for the comment that they are currently using Marvell controllers!

I wonder if this is a short-term "generation" quick-fix. To stay competitive in the market they have to adopt Sandforce quick... but the longer term strategy must be to have their own controller.

But didn't LSI just buy Sandforce? Ah, quick, let's buy LSI shares... Intel will take them over next.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
3,924 (0.63/day)
System Name Main / Home Media Serever
Processor Intel i5 2500k @ 4.75ghz / AMD AM3 5200+ x2
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Performance / Biostar 790GX
Cooling Xigmatek Dark Knight / XIGMATEK Apache
Memory 12gb of G.Skill Value Series DDR3 / 4x 1gb DDR2
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon 6870 1gb / Asus Radeon 5450 512mb
Storage 2x Samsung 830 64gb SSD Raid 0 & 750gb WD Blue HDD / OCZ Vertex II 80GB & 10TB of HDD Space
Display(s) 2x Acer 24" LED / Samsung 50" LED
Case Xigmatek Asgard II / APEX PC-389-C
Power Supply Rosewill 750w / Antec EArthwatts 380w
Software Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1 / Ubuntu 14.04
Intel's drives are just to expensive. I bought a Samsung 830 64gb for $95 (only cost me $65 after sold included games and software) and it has 500mb read and 160mb write. Yes the write speed is slower but at a fraction of the cost and I have a 2nd on the way for raid 0 with will help with the write speed.
 

Fx

Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
1,332 (0.23/day)
Location
Portland, OR
Processor Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Noctua
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series 16GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) EVGA 980ti FTW
Storage (OS)Samsung 950 Pro (512GB), (Data) WD Reds
Display(s) 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser GAME ONE
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Deck Hassium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Intel's drives are just to expensive. I bought a Samsung 830 64gb for $95 (only cost me $65 after sold included games and software) and it has 500mb read and 160mb write. Yes the write speed is slower but at a fraction of the cost and I have a 2nd on the way for raid 0 with will help with the write speed.

$65, lol nice, that sounds like the shit I do. Craigslist FTMFW!

it will be interesting to see how these drives fair. reliability and price are two big IFs for this marriage
 
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
5,202 (0.91/day)
System Name Dust Collector
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Motherboard Asus B550I Aorus Pro WiFi AX
Cooling Alpenfohn Black Ridge V2 w/ Noctua NF-A9x14
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 3200MHz/CL16
Video Card(s) Power Color Red Dragon RX 5700 XT
Storage Samsung EVO+ 500GB NVMe
Display(s) Dell S2721DGF
Case Dan Case A4
Power Supply Corsair SF600 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Logitech G613
Intel's drives are just to expensive. I bought a Samsung 830 64gb for $95 (only cost me $65 after sold included games and software) and it has 500mb read and 160mb write. Yes the write speed is slower but at a fraction of the cost and I have a 2nd on the way for raid 0 with will help with the write speed.

I did the same exact thing. I refused to settle for SF, what with all their issues, so I held out until BF and scored an 80GB Intel 320 for my laptop and a 64GB Samsung 830 for my desktop. Both of them cost me about $130 combined. :D Onto the Intel 520 series drives, I wonder if SF-based Intel drives have less issues than a smaller company like OCZ. SF speeds with Intel's reliability would make for one hell of a drive.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,516 (0.61/day)
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
I do not see the Sandforce connection at all. So they have the same drive sizes and similar IOPS and peak transfer rates and then just to the conclusion that they must be Sandforce controllers???
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
331 (0.06/day)
Location
New York, NY
System Name The Baconator
Processor Phenom II X4 965 @ 4.00GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-790FX
Cooling Zalman 9900 CPU Cooler
Memory 16Gb DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD 5870
Storage OS: WD 300Gb @ 10,000rpm. Storage: 2 x 1Tb @ 7,200rpm
Display(s) ASUS 27" LED 1080p Monitor
Case Cooler Master Sniper Medium Tower
Audio Device(s) MoBo Integrated
Power Supply Corsair PSU 750W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Can't wait for the actual release date and prices, 'cause I'm actually planning to snatch a couple for a RAID 0 set up in my ENVY 17 laptop...
 
Top