- Joined
- Dec 5, 2006
- Messages
- 7,704 (1.17/day)
System Name | Back to Blue |
---|---|
Processor | i9 14900k |
Motherboard | Asrock Z790 Nova |
Cooling | Corsair H150i Elite |
Memory | 64GB Corsair Dominator DDR5-6400 @ 6600 |
Video Card(s) | EVGA RTX 3090 Ultra FTW3 |
Storage | 4TB WD 850x NVME, 4TB WD Black, 10TB Seagate Barracuda Pro |
Display(s) | 1x Samsung Odyssey G7 Neo and 1x Dell u2518d |
Case | Lian Li o11 DXL w/custom vented front panel |
Audio Device(s) | Focusrite Saffire PRO 14 -> DBX DriveRack PA+ -> Mackie MR8 and MR10 / Senn PX38X -> SB AE-5 Plus |
Power Supply | Corsair RM1000i |
Mouse | Logitech G502x |
Keyboard | Corsair K95 Platinum |
Software | Windows 11 x64 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | 31k multicore Cinebench - CPU limited 125w |
What, so they can learn to hack together an OS from 1000's a pieces of hastily written code from inexperienced programmers. Each "flavor", usually being incompatible with the 200 other versions of the same thing. The best part is, that one person has control, of all changes to the final kernel release.
How many hardware vendors do you know, that want to release open source version of their drivers?
Linux has purposes, but taking over Windows is not one of them. It has some excellent applications in the server market, but even then I'd go elsewhere.
Thats a scary sad idea... But I don't think microsofts programing team could even understand the source code for a linux os. They would look at it and just kinda go huh?!?!?!?