• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

HP Envy 14 Spectre Now Available

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,233 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
HP's posterboy Ultrabook, the Envy 14 Spectre, was announced last month amidst some fanfare, though it wasn't immediately available. As announced it is now available via HP's online store for US $1,399.99 for the base-configuration, and 1,899.99 for HP's "recommended configuration", which includes a 256 GB SSD, and a Core i7-2770M processor instead of a 128 GB SSD and Core i5-2467M on the base-configuration, among other HP-exclusives. The 14-incher measures 12.88" (W) x 8.7" (D) x 0.79" (H), weighing 1.8 kg, packs a 1366x768 pixel screen; two of its most notable features, apart from its size, include solid-state storage and near-field communication (NFC).



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

ktr

Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
7,404 (1.09/day)
Disappointing screen resolution. Dunno why HP doesn't offer 1600x900 screens anymore. First gen 14" Envy had them.
 

Completely Bonkers

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.40/day)
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
Agreed. "Ultra" should not be used to define low-resolution. 1366x768 is fine on 10 or 11". But on 14" it is a poor show. 1680x1050 should be their target. 1600x900 is very 2007. 2012 should bring us progress
 

Bo$$

Lab Extraordinaire
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
5,656 (1.00/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name Desktop | Server
Processor Intel i7 2700k @ 4.6GHZ | AMD 5350 @ 2500MHZ
Motherboard Asus P7Z77-V Pro | Asus AM1I-A
Cooling Corsair H60v2 | Stock Air
Memory Crucial Ballistix 2x8GB CL8 1600MHZ | Corsair Vengence 2x4GB CL9 1600MHZ
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 6GB | PNY GTX 750Ti
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 250GB + 4TB WD Red | 2x Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Display(s) Samsung S27D390H + Asus VE276Q | Headless
Case Fractal Design R5 | CM Elite 110
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1 w/Otone Stilo 5.1 and Creative Fatal1ty headset
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 850 G2| Corsair CX430M
Mouse Razer Imperator 2012
Keyboard Corsair K90
Software Windows 7 SP1 X64 | Ubuntu 16.04LTS
even the envy 13 had those screens!
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
10,077 (1.84/day)
Location
Home
System Name Orange! // ItchyHands
Processor 3570K // 10400F
Motherboard ASRock z77 Extreme4 // TUF Gaming B460M-Plus
Cooling Stock // Stock
Memory 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3 // 2x8Gb 3200 Mhz XPG D41
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 // Asus TUF RTX 2070
Storage Samsung 840 250Gb // SX8200 480GB
Display(s) LG 22EA53VQ // Philips 275M QHD
Case NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange // Tecware Forge M
Power Supply Corsair CXM500w // CM MWE 600w
You can get 1600x900 screen, just not in the base configuration. Do people ever read anymore? :shadedshu
 

Completely Bonkers

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.40/day)
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
You can get 1600x900 screen, just not in the base configuration. Do people ever read anymore? :shadedshu

I think we all read the OP, "news", PR, Marketing blurb. And it said nothing but something we all felt was rather poor. I don't think it should be necessary for us to have to start an internet hunt to track down options that the Press Release / PR guys obviously didnt think was important for us to know.

Is the fault ours? Or is the fault attributable to poor PR? I call for those PR guys to fall on swords, and for us to continue to pester the industry to take high pixel density seriously. HELL, I bet Apple will do high pixel density on their next iMac/Air range and THEN, FINALLY, the herds of PC manufacturers will follow suit.

Why do we have to wait for Apple to bring the innovation (in an expensive walled garden product) before the PC industry finally moves their pedestrian design/PR teams to bring out something similar but cheaper?
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
4,502 (0.82/day)
Location
Denmark
System Name The work PC /2700x/5950x
Processor 3900X stock/ 2700x stock/ 5950x 4200 MHz fixed @ 1,056-1,08V
Motherboard Gigabyte AORUS Master X570/2xMSI X470 M7 AC
Cooling Custom WC XSPC RX480, Laing DDC, XSPC Laing DDC Top V3 and EK Velocity/NH15/NH-U12S SE
Memory 32 GB Viper 3600/14 /16 GB Trident Z F4-4000C18D-16GTZSW 3600 /32 GB G Skill Flare CL14 3400
Video Card(s) 2070 Super X MSI/GTX 970 MSI/ GTX 970 MSI
Storage 1 TB SSD+500 GB NVMe / 500 GB SSD/ 2 TB 990 Pro
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2518D/2408WFP
Case Corsair 800D / Lian test bench/NZXT 500
Power Supply AX 850 Titanium/AX 860i/AX 760
Software Dual boot/Win 10 / Linux / Win 10+Linux
i7-2770M? I didn't know that a CPU with that name was released and I checked at the web, Intels homepage and at CPU World. Specs please. The name suggest a quad and hence about 45 W! In a Ultrabook, most be a hell of a blower sitting on top of that CPU. According to HP site it is a i7-2677M.
 
Last edited:

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
10,077 (1.84/day)
Location
Home
System Name Orange! // ItchyHands
Processor 3570K // 10400F
Motherboard ASRock z77 Extreme4 // TUF Gaming B460M-Plus
Cooling Stock // Stock
Memory 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3 // 2x8Gb 3200 Mhz XPG D41
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 // Asus TUF RTX 2070
Storage Samsung 840 250Gb // SX8200 480GB
Display(s) LG 22EA53VQ // Philips 275M QHD
Case NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange // Tecware Forge M
Power Supply Corsair CXM500w // CM MWE 600w
I think we all read the OP, "news", PR, Marketing blurb. And it said nothing but something we all felt was rather poor. I don't think it should be necessary for us to have to start an internet hunt to track down options that the Press Release / PR guys obviously didnt think was important for us to know.

Is the fault ours? Or is the fault attributable to poor PR? I call for those PR guys to fall on swords, and for us to continue to pester the industry to take high pixel density seriously. HELL, I bet Apple will do high pixel density on their next iMac/Air range and THEN, FINALLY, the herds of PC manufacturers will follow suit.

Why do we have to wait for Apple to bring the innovation (in an expensive walled garden product) before the PC industry finally moves their pedestrian design/PR teams to bring out something similar but cheaper?

That would be Bta's style of writing the news, because quite a few other websites mentioned about the higher res screen you get if you are going with the recommended specs. Everybody shares the some of the fault, but it makes me sad (and slightly annoyed) that posters will just post some junk without researching a bit deeper, making themselves look like fools.

I have no problems with low pixel density, but people conveniently forget that you can easily get high pixel screens for a little more cash. The option is there, but blinded by "omgwtfcheap" glasses(tm) everybody seems to wear. Every major laptop manufacturer produce 1080p screens for their standard (non budget) lineup as an upgrade, and quite a few even does the 1200p demanded by a certain vocal group of people.
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
4,502 (0.82/day)
Location
Denmark
System Name The work PC /2700x/5950x
Processor 3900X stock/ 2700x stock/ 5950x 4200 MHz fixed @ 1,056-1,08V
Motherboard Gigabyte AORUS Master X570/2xMSI X470 M7 AC
Cooling Custom WC XSPC RX480, Laing DDC, XSPC Laing DDC Top V3 and EK Velocity/NH15/NH-U12S SE
Memory 32 GB Viper 3600/14 /16 GB Trident Z F4-4000C18D-16GTZSW 3600 /32 GB G Skill Flare CL14 3400
Video Card(s) 2070 Super X MSI/GTX 970 MSI/ GTX 970 MSI
Storage 1 TB SSD+500 GB NVMe / 500 GB SSD/ 2 TB 990 Pro
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2518D/2408WFP
Case Corsair 800D / Lian test bench/NZXT 500
Power Supply AX 850 Titanium/AX 860i/AX 760
Software Dual boot/Win 10 / Linux / Win 10+Linux
. Everybody shares the some of the fault, but it makes me sad (and slightly annoyed) that posters will just post some junk without researching a bit deeper, making themselves look like fools.

I know that this was not an reply to my post (wrong CPU in press release) but how can 20 different sites post the press release and not think - wow a new Intel CPU.....and then research and commit on it?
 
Top