- Joined
- Mar 2, 2009
- Messages
- 8,400 (1.45/day)
- Location
- Up North
System Name | Aki |
---|---|
Processor | AMD 7800X3D |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-A |
Cooling | MSI MAG CoreLiquid E360 |
Memory | Patriot Viper Elite 5 32GB 6200 |
Video Card(s) | PNY RTX 4090 XLR8 |
Storage | Samsung 960 Pro 512 GB + WD Black SN850 1TB |
Display(s) | Dell 32" Curved Gaming Monitor (S3220DGF) |
Case | Corsair 5000D Airflow |
Audio Device(s) | On-board |
Power Supply | EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G5 |
Mouse | Roccat Kone Pure |
Keyboard | ASUS ROG Strix Scope II Wireless |
Software | Win 11 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | Always changing~ |
We need a reference for those tests. Everybody is testing randomly here. To bad there are no predefined profiles... Or are they??
Someone will need to create a thread to track scores and set a parameter for users.
Example:
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112995&highlight=uningine
I simply posted my results to show that Heavan 4.0 utilized 100% with one and two 7970's; however when I added the third the utilization went down to about 66%.
There are but when I have a 1440p monitor why the hell would I want to run a benchmark at a puny 1600x900 (the "extreme" preset resolution)?
I thumb my nose at things which encourage this current trend of resolution stagnation to continue. Benchmarks should be about pushing technology, not pretending it's 2005.
This is why I ran my tests at 2650x1600.
Same run as above with a little bump to the cpu...glad to see so little impact from a cpu overclock.
http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/qq69/rickss69/PC Gaming/HeavenExtreme-speedbump_zps1f17a475.jpg
I also found that overclocking my CPU had little impact. Nice to know