Intel Bay Trail-T Launching On September 11

[Over_Lord]

Intel's updated Atom family, part of the new Bay Trail-T platform, will arrive on September 11. The new Bay Trail-T lineup includes four quad-core chips and will be part of two different series of chips. The four chips include the Z3770D, Z3770D, Z3740 and Z3740D. Here, the 'D' suffix bearing chips will be able to drive a maximum display resolution of 1920 x 1200, while the non-'D' chips will be able to drive 2560 x 1600 resolution panels. Additionally, the 'D' chips have support for 10.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is a much higher 17.1 GB/s for the non-'D' chips. Clock speeds for the 3770 series will max out at 2.4 GHz, while the 3740 series will be limited to 1.8 GHz. The GPU department will be handled by Intel HD Graphics. Expect more details to surface at IDF later this year.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site

 

[xvi]

High frequency with such low wattage? I'm slightly worried about IPC now.

 

[Brusfantomet]

This time nobody wants the D

But is seams like the extra memory channel on th "non D" chips is giving the extra bandwidth that allows for 2560 x 1600. That extra channel also makes it possible to use 4 GiB ram by the looks of it, and since the memory controller can run a little slower the hole chip saves 10% - 20%.

Anyway its still probably gonna suck compared to the AMD APUs.

 

[Octavean]

I'd like to see what they can do,....

Not sure I would want one no matter what though,...

 

[Frick]

Out of execution order woopdidoo. Want benchies like NOW.

 

[Patriot]

High frequency with such low wattage? I'm slightly worried about IPC now.

To things to note.... UP-to (turbo frequencies listed)
and SDP Scenario Design Power rather than TDP ...

sneaky marketing.

 

[trickson]

This time nobody wants the D.
Anyway its still probably gonna suck compared to the AMD APUs.

And you base this hypothesis on what exactly? Got proof? Links? Benchmarks? Hmm.... :shadedshu

 

[RCoon]

Stop advertising sDP Intel, please, its note like your TDP is even that high unless you're trying to lie to fit into the mobile market, because that doesnt work that way.

 

[suraswami]

And you base this hypothesis on what exactly? Got proof? Links? Benchmarks? Hmm.... :shadedshu

here is one (may not be legit yet!)

http://liliputing.com/2013/07/intel-atom-z3770-bay-trail-chip-specs-performance-leaked.html

 

[trickson]

here is one (may not be legit yet!)

http://liliputing.com/2013/07/intel-atom-z3770-bay-trail-chip-specs-performance-leaked.html

Not sure of what to think of "leaked" information, But okay it doesn't suck but isn't the best for sure.

 

[Patriot]

Not sure of what to think of "leaked" information, But okay it doesn't suck but isn't the best for sure.

Depends on gpu performance...
and what the TDP actually is.

I'll wait for released benches.

 

[Brusfantomet]

And you base this hypothesis on what exactly? Got proof? Links? Benchmarks? Hmm.... :shadedshu

no prof, just anecdotal evidence. Have yet to try an atom system without getting the notion that the processor was to slow.

 

[Over_Lord]

High frequency with such low wattage? I'm slightly worried about IPC now.

SDP is a scam. Don't believe it.

 

[lemonadesoda]

Speed bump and OoO. Atom is interesting again. I need to retire these crappy N270/280 and D330's.

 

[Frick]

Speed bump and OoO. Atom is interesting again. I need to retire these crappy N270/280 and D330's.

Totally so. And the 1.1Ghz ones are supposedly 30% faster than a 2.2Ghz Snapdragon. Can't wait for benchmarks!

 

[Ikaruga]

Z3770D, Z3770D, Z3740 and Z3740D.

Z3770, Z3770D......

Additionally, the 'D' chips have support for 10.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is a much higher 17.1 GB/s for the non-'D' chips.

Perhaps my English is not good enough, but this sounds a bit weird, or not?