- Joined
- Apr 7, 2006
- Messages
- 7,404 (1.08/day)
The 3000hp staticstic i dont believe. I cant find a single source other than a few guys on the internet claiming it on different forums and blogs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W16_engine
However, the theoretical top speed being 257mph is true, i just thought theyd said in top gear that it was capable of more than 260mph on their first review of the car. But nvm.
edit: yep the above claim is purely hearsay
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bugatti_Veyron#The_.223000_horsepower.22_claim
edit2: Okay, i understand this claim now and also how absurd it is. It would be akin to saying my cardboard box has 3000hp because it burns that much chemical energy in petrol per second. However, all of it is lost to thermal dissipation and conversion to light energy. Its a pretty stupid claim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bugatti_Veyron#3.2C000_HP
in other words, the engine is quite inefficient... according to that article, other cars are around 1/3 loss. PopSci did a review on the car, and it was proven true from the engineers.
I read that article, from Jeremy, and for every "marvel" he stated, it more of a glued up car of multiple design. i can see another car company already having it. For example the Saleen S7, it body design is made in a way in which faster you drive, more down force it gets. This technology is also seen in many topfuel drag cars. Porsche and their retractable spoiler..duh..fuctional maybe not as much but still there, rally cars and their skirts so they dont twist in high speed turns and when in the air. engine...come on, well all know about the suzuki escudo pikes peak with two v6, twin turbo forged to make a nice 1000 bhp w12...