- Joined
- Apr 24, 2008
- Messages
- 2,021 (0.33/day)
Processor | RyZen R9 3950X |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock X570 Taichi |
Cooling | Coolermaster Master Liquid ML240L RGB |
Memory | 64GB DDR4 3200 (4x16GB) |
Video Card(s) | RTX 3050 |
Storage | Samsung 2TB SSD |
Display(s) | Asus VE276Q, VE278Q and VK278Q triple 27” 1920x1080 |
Case | Zulman MS800 |
Audio Device(s) | On Board |
Power Supply | Seasonic 650W |
VR HMD | Oculus Rift, Oculus Quest V1, Oculus Quest 2 |
Software | Windows 11 64bit |
Update on forbes.com:
I've seen more then one article making this claim (not sure if it is the same source). I still need to hear it from Dell though.
Even if it is accurate its still a reasonably priced useful 4K monitor for some applications. It would still be something I would buy for my Wife. There are also a number of 4K monitors and UHDTVs coming out and not for much more then this Dell model's ~$699 USD price (Lenovo, ASUS, Philips, Toshiba, Polaroid and so on).
I was willing to spend about ~$1000 USD for a 4K monitor around "28 to 32" and that hasn't changed.
If anything I may not be a day one buyer if its 30Hz because that would give me time to see what competing products will become available.
EDIT:
Now that I think about it, a Dell 2560x1440 display would typically start at about ~$650 USD and go up to about ~$1000 now. Even if this 4K Dell is limited to 30Hz at 4K it will likely do 2560x1440 at 60Hz which makes it at least equivalent to Dell's current 2560x1440 monitors in a number of ways (albeit not necessarily all ways) with the added benefit of 4K.
Last edited: