• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA to Launch GeForce GTX 960 in January

Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,355 (0.50/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
Today's games do not really benefit from resolutions higher than 1080p because they were never designed for a resolution higher than that. Sure you can crank the resolution of a game up to 4K but you are not improving the graphics in anyway, you are just increasing the resolution. You need games to be developed with higher resolution TEXTURES first before you can really enjoy the visual experience of 1440p or even 4K gaming.

I game at 1200p, but even I can understand that effective draw distance is enhanced by higher resolutions.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,668 (0.33/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard ASUS STRIX X670E-F
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / EK Quantum CPU / Alphacool GPU / XSPC 480mm w/ Corsair Fans
Memory 96GB (2 x 48 GB) G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim X 24GB
Storage WD SN850 2TB, Samsung PM981a 1TB, 4 x 4TB + 1 x 10TB HGST NAS HDD for Windows Storage Spaces
Display(s) 2 x Viotek GFI27QXA 27" 4K 120Hz + LG UH850 4K 60Hz + HMD
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) Sony MDR-7506 / Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x 1 kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Corsair K100
VR HMD HP Reverb G2
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Mellanox ConnectX-3 10 Gb/s Fiber Network Card
Then what are the other many factors affecting memory bandwidth?
Anyone can criticize, very few can provide explanations... ;)
You also have memory technology (e.g. DDR-SDRAM vs RDRAM), and memory frequency affecting bandwidth. It's highly likely the GTX 960 uses GDDR5 @ 7GHz since that's what Nvidia has been using this generation, but we don't know for sure.

I think the more important part of the conversation is that you're picking one piece of information, a 128-bit bus, and saying that because of that this card will be a dud. We already know that the Maxwell architecture is less dependent on bandwidth than previous generations, and we don't know anything else about this GM206 GPU, so how can you conclude it's memory bandwidth constrained?

The rumored specs of the GTX 960 (in comparison to the GTX 770) reminds me of the ATI HD 5770 (in comparison to the HD 4870). The HD 5770 had the same performance as the previous generation HD 4870 with the same number of shaders despite having a memory bus half as wide. With a little bit of effort, I don't see why this wouldn't be possible for Nvidia to repeat.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
2,213 (0.44/day)
System Name Ultima
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard MSI Mag B550M Mortar
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 240 rev4 w/ Ryzen offset mount
Memory G.SKill Ripjaws V 2x16GB DDR4 3600
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 4070 12GB Dual
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB Gen4, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB , 1TB Crucial MX500 SSD sata,
Display(s) ASUS TUF VG249Q3A 24" 1080p 165-180Hz VRR
Case DarkFlash DLM21 Mesh
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC1200 Audio/Nvidia HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Mouse Rog Strix Impact 3 Wireless | Wacom Intuos CTH-480
Keyboard A4Tech B314 Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro
Then what are the other many factors affecting memory bandwidth?
Anyone can criticize, very few can provide explanations... ;)

You also have memory technology (e.g. DDR-SDRAM vs RDRAM), and memory frequency affecting bandwidth. It's highly likely the GTX 960 uses GDDR5 @ 7GHz since that's what Nvidia has been using this generation, but we don't know for sure.

I think the more important part of the conversation is that you're picking one piece of information, a 128-bit bus, and saying that because of that this card will be a dud. We already know that the Maxwell architecture is less dependent on bandwidth than previous generations, and we don't know anything else about this GM206 GPU, so how can you conclude it's memory bandwidth constrained?

The rumored specs of the GTX 960 (in comparison to the GTX 770) reminds me of the ATI HD 5770 (in comparison to the HD 4870). The HD 5770 had the same performance as the previous generation HD 4870 with the same number of shaders despite having a memory bus half as wide. With a little bit of effort, I don't see why this wouldn't be possible for Nvidia to repeat.

All this bandwidth talk

Like The Von Matrices mentioned, one of Nvidia Maxwell's fundamental improvements was memory bandwidth optimization (Nvidia's 3rd Generation Color Compression).
Most GPUs, like the older ones uses improved memory compression algorithms on each new generation. This is why some new generation lower bus bandwidth can still cope up with the old generation with higher bandwidth .

TO be more specific, a quote from Tom's

Regardless of Maxwell’s more efficient graphics architecture, the GeForce GTX 980 suffers a 33% drop in peak memory bandwidth compared to the GeForce GTX 780 Ti. Nvidia mitigates this deficit by implementing an improved memory compression scheme. GM204 sports an improved third-generation delta color compression mode that provides more options to the hardware. Using 8x8 blocks of 64 pixels, compression analysis is performed on 2x4 blocks in order to achieve the best compression possible in 8:1, 4:1, and 2:1 steps. If 2:1 compression isn't doable, that block isn't compressed. Successfully compressed blocks save even more bandwidth every time the memory is read. Nvidia claims that this increases effective memory bandwidth from 224 GB/s to approximately 300 GB/s compared to the GeForce GTX 680 Kepler-class cards.

Anyway, if this becomes a GTX 770 Tier card, might be a good replacement for my current GTX 660, or perhaps a card in between the 970 and 960 (A 960Ti perhaps along the line)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.15/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
whatever :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

RockStarFish

New Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2013
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
Nvidia did not set the bar very high for 2015. Efficiency, thats all you got? year old 290x still gives 980 a fight. AMD is going drop a game changer with HBM
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,730 (1.39/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Funny comments are funny! :D
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,356 (0.47/day)
Location
VT
Processor Intel i7-10700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Aurorus Ultra z490
Cooling Corsair H100i RGB
Memory 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200MHz
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming Trio X 3070 LHR
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q / AOC G2590FX
Case Corsair X4000 iCue
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
Nvidia did not set the bar very high for 2015. Efficiency, thats all you got? year old 290x still gives 980 a fight. AMD is going drop a game changer with HBM

No they won't. If they do drop a card that can crush the 980 it will be priced at about $600 just like the HD7970 was at launch. AMD are only the bargain kings when they can't compete.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
4,520 (0.71/day)
Location
Perth AU
Processor Intel Core i9 10980XE @ 4.7Ghz 1.2v
Motherboard ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
Cooling EK-Velocity D-RGB, EK-CoolStream PE 360, XSPC TX240 Ultrathin, EK X-RES 140 Revo D5 RGB PWM
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB F4-3000C14D 64GB
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4090 OC WC
Storage M.2 990 Pro 1TB / 10TB WD RED Helium / 3x 860 2TB Evos
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G7 28"
Case Corsair Obsidian 500D SE Modded
Power Supply Cooler Master V Series 1300W
Software Windows 11
Well i just picked up a GTX 760 for cheap $120 AUD it works just fine for my needs on my lan box.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.55/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Nvidia did not set the bar very high for 2015. Efficiency, thats all you got? year old 290x still gives 980 a fight. AMD is going drop a game changer with HBM
LOL @ all your posts at this site so far... I wonder which way you lean...:roll:
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
13,995 (2.34/day)
Location
Louisiana
Processor Core i9-9900k
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax ETS-T50 Black CPU cooler
Memory 32GB (2x16) Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 4070 Ti Super OC 16GB
Storage 1x 1TB MX500 (OS); 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 2TB MX500; 1x 1TB BX500 SSD; 1x 6TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) Infievo 27" 165Hz @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-1000 Gold
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
LOL @ all your posts at this site so far... I wonder which way you lean...:roll:

Indeed....in fact he's ignoring the fact that the chip that he describes the 290x going neck and neck with is not even Nvidia's top-tier Maxwell chip!
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,356 (0.47/day)
Location
VT
Processor Intel i7-10700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Aurorus Ultra z490
Cooling Corsair H100i RGB
Memory 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200MHz
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming Trio X 3070 LHR
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q / AOC G2590FX
Case Corsair X4000 iCue
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
Indeed....in fact he's ignoring the fact that the chip that he describes the 290x going neck and neck with is not even Nvidia's top-tier Maxwell chip!

Or the fact that the GTX980 beats the 290X in just about every category (size, manufacturing cost presumably, power efficiency, heat generation, features arguably). Assuming the big daddy Maxwell is a sizeable performance jump over the GTX980, AMD still has to get all those factors under control before they are truly competitive. In the mean time people are buying GTX970's and 980's as quickly as they can because they are very good products.
 
Top