• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GM206-300 Silicon Pictured

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,304 (7.52/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Here's the first picture of NVIDIA next chip based on its "Maxwell" architecture, GM206-300. Powering the upcoming GeForce GTX 960 graphics card, the silicon appears to have half the die-size of the company's current flagship GM204, which powers the GTX 980 and GTX 970. The package itself is smaller, with its much lower pin-count, owing to half the memory bus width to the GM204, at 128-bit, and fewer power pins. No other specs are leaked, but we won't be surprised if its CUDA core count is about half that of the GTX 980. NVIDIA plans to launch the GeForce GTX 960 on the 22nd of January, 2015.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2013
Messages
33 (0.01/day)
if it is indead half of the gtx 980, i dont see how it would compete with gtx 680/770, maybe with the 760 at a lower price, still it would be more probable a 1280sp comfiguration, double 750ti, but the die size seem to disagree lol
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
503 (0.13/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
if it is indead half of the gtx 980, i dont see how it would compete with gtx 680/770, maybe with the 760 at a lower price, still it would be more probable a 1280sp comfiguration, double 750ti, but the die size seem to disagree lol
Yeah, looks like 960 is gonna be another dissapointment from nvidia as far as midrange is concerned.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.16/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
The 980 competes with and beats the 780 despite having a smaller bus width and just over half the shaders.

This should match the 670 and 760Ti imo, perhaps with <100W TDP. It'll as such be ideal for most gamers wanting to play at high settings with 1080p screens (that being most gamers).
 

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
13,012 (2.49/day)
Location
Loveland, CO
System Name Ryzen Reflection
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling 2x EK PE360 | TechN AM4 AMD Block Black | EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G | 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage WD SN850 500GB (OS) | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) | Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s) Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS | Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS | LG 24" IPS 1440p
Case Lian Li PC-011D XL | Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s) FiiO K7 | Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard Corsair K65 Plus 75% Wireless - USB Mode
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit
you guys are jumping so quick to pure speculation. Maxwell and Kepler are different architectures, and the lossless compression algorithm for the limited memory bandwidth seems to be working well on 970/980. I'll reserve performance judgement till we see 960 and 960Ti reviews
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,267 (0.67/day)
Location
Sanford, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
GTX 960 = probably be the best selling GPU of 2015.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.08/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
The way I see it, the GTX980 is almost exactly double the performance of a GTX760. So it sounds pretty reasonable that cutting it exactly in half would yield similar performance to a GTX760 at a much lower power consumption.

I mean, yeah it isn't that exciting to go from a 760 to a 960 and get no performance improvement. But the power difference will be insane. And if nVidia decides to ramp up the clocks, because the power consumption allows it, then it may just be possible to get close to 770 performance.

Of course they could have snuck a few extra shaders in there too. They could be doubling the 750ti, which would give it 1280 shaders.

I'm going to wait for the performance numbers, and just as importantly the price, before calling this a disappointment. And also remember they'll likely have a 960ti that is carved out of GM204.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
2,388 (0.62/day)
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
System Name Home Brewed
Processor i9-7900X and i7-8700K
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme & ASUS Prime Z-370 A
Cooling Corsair 280mm AIO & Thermaltake Water 3.0
Memory 64GB DDR4-3000 GSKill RipJaws-V & 32GB DDR4-3466 GEIL Potenza
Video Card(s) 2X-GTX-1080 SLI & 2 GTX-1070Ti 8GB G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage Both have 2TB HDDs for storage, 480GB SSDs for OS, and 240GB SSDs for Steam Games
Display(s) ACER 28" B286HK 4K & Samsung 32" 1080P
Case NZXT Source 540 & Rosewill Rise Chassis
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM1000 & Corsair RM850
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Tournament & Corsair K90
Software Win-10 Professional
Benchmark Scores yes
Show me the reviews,.........
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.15/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Yeah, looks like 960 is gonna be another dissapointment from nvidia as far as midrange is concerned.

The first 28nm GPU was launched in 2011, that's 3 !!! years ago and counting. The worst node change in history. And they still try to sell you crap.

Keep buying, guys!

It is not crazy who eats it but the one who gives him.!

960 is so bad that they are afraid even to mention the process node in the articles about it.

GTX 960 = probably be the best selling GPU of 2015.

Sure :rolleyes: Because people blindly follow that company, it's like the sect built by Apple with their iphones which actually have no competitive advantages whatsoever but still people blindly throw multiple times more money. And this have the potential to be dramatically improved with people's own cost optimisations.




http://www.extremetech.com/computin...y-with-tsmc-claims-22nm-essentially-worthless

Nvidia was unhappy with TSMC 3 years ago.

However, according to the diagram, we have already been in that area of the graph which points to logical move to the new process, back in mid 2014.......

Intel is now on 14nm, and GPU makers are still struggling with 28nm products.

What the... is going wrong with these guys? :(
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
12,062 (2.60/day)
Location
Gypsyland, UK
System Name HP Omen 17
Processor i7 7700HQ
Memory 16GB 2400Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1060
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB + HGST 1TB
Display(s) 1080p IPS G-SYNC 75Hz
Audio Device(s) Bang & Olufsen
Power Supply 230W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD+
Software Win 10 Pro
actually have no competitive advantages whatsoever but still people blindly throw multiple times more money

The 970 had a colossal advantage. It outperformed the AMD cards, it used less power, and it cost so much less that AMD had to axe their prices severely. The 970 went on to score stupendously high in almost every review, and became one of the best selling GPUs of the decade.
So it does have competitive advantage in literally every area, and it didn't cost multiple times more money. What's more, it was built on 28nm, which just goes to show GPU makers from all manufacturers can produce far more than they have been on the same node. All you have to do is create an amazing architecture.

NVidia (like every other company) is not here to make people happy. These people run businesses. Businesses exist to make money by making smart decisions and producing good products. They're not out here to do us a favour, they're trying to sell us a product. They did just that, and if AMD were in the same position, they'd do the same.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
2,388 (0.62/day)
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
System Name Home Brewed
Processor i9-7900X and i7-8700K
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme & ASUS Prime Z-370 A
Cooling Corsair 280mm AIO & Thermaltake Water 3.0
Memory 64GB DDR4-3000 GSKill RipJaws-V & 32GB DDR4-3466 GEIL Potenza
Video Card(s) 2X-GTX-1080 SLI & 2 GTX-1070Ti 8GB G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage Both have 2TB HDDs for storage, 480GB SSDs for OS, and 240GB SSDs for Steam Games
Display(s) ACER 28" B286HK 4K & Samsung 32" 1080P
Case NZXT Source 540 & Rosewill Rise Chassis
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM1000 & Corsair RM850
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Tournament & Corsair K90
Software Win-10 Professional
Benchmark Scores yes
They're not out here to do us a favour, they're trying to sell us a product. They did just that, and if AMD were in the same position, they'd do the same.

The AMD 280s and 290s came out at a fairly decent price. Then, Bitcoin miners snatched them up in a big way, inflating prices for them. We suffered with those artificially high GPU prices for a long time until recently when the 970 and 980 were released.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
2,198 (0.44/day)
Location
So. Cal.
Does anyone know why we're see silicone that's rectangle not square? That doesn't fly with logic to use the round wafer sufficiently?
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.15/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
The 970 had a colossal advantage. It outperformed the AMD cards, it used less power, and it cost so much less that AMD had to axe their prices severely.

It doesn't outperform the R9 290X, especially at Full 4K. It uses a bit of less power, bu I highly doubt it would matter so much in the end.

Both are at virtually identical prices. And yes, prices from AMD needed to be adjusted accordingly but it has always been happening in both directions.

The 970 went on to score stupendously high in almost every review, and became one of the best selling GPUs of the decade.

Source or statistical data published somewhere?

...it was built on 28nm, which just goes to show GPU makers from all manufacturers can produce far more than they have been on the same node. All you have to do is create an amazing architecture.

Don't speak about 28nm anymore. These amazing architectures need to be on fine next-gen process now.

We are lagging with the progress.

4K should have already been affordable mainstream.

Does anyone know why we're see silicone that's rectangle not square? That doesn't fly with logic to use the round wafer sufficiently?

Haha, because a square is taken and cut into two slices. :(
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
503 (0.13/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
It doesn't outperform the R9 290X, especially at Full 4K. It uses a bit of less power, bu I highly doubt it would matter so much in the end.

Hahahha, thats the biggest understatment yet.
120W more is quite alot.

 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.08/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
It doesn't outperform the R9 290X, especially at Full 4K. It uses a bit of less power, bu I highly doubt it would matter so much in the end.

The GTX970 matches the 290X at Full 4K, but it outperforms the 290X at 1440p and 1080p.

As for the power usage, no one seems to want to accept it but Hawaii consumes more power than Fermi did! And not just a little bit more either, we're talking a good 40-50w more under load. What really amazes me is that Fermi at least outperformed the competition. Hawaii doesn't outperform the competition, yet I don't really see any hate towards Hawaii but everyone hated on Fermi. And the difference between Fermi and Cayman was about 40w, the difference between Hawaii and GM204 is 100w!

Don't speak about 28nm anymore. These amazing architectures need to be on fine next-gen process now.

Talk to the foundries about that, they are the ones holding backup progress to smaller nodes.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.15/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
The GTX970 matches the 290X at Full 4K, but it outperforms the 290X at 1440p and 1080p.

Double standard?

"Matches", according to TPU's own review, is 5% more performance for the R9 290X.

At lower resolutions things go opposite but it is obvious that the R9 290X is still the more capable graphics card.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
503 (0.13/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
Double standard?

"Matches", according to TPU's own review, is 5% more performance for the R9 290X.

At lower resolutions things go opposite but it is obvious that the R9 290X is still the more capable graphics card.
Just stop being a butthurt fanboy, mkay ?
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.08/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Double standard?

"Matches", according to TPU's own review, is 5% more performance for the R9 290X.

At lower resolutions things go opposite but it is obvious that the R9 290X is still the more capable graphics card.


I'm not sure what review you're looking at but:


That looks like a 3% advantage to the 290x to me, which is completely unnoticeable. And even more, only a 1% difference for the 970 in the review. That is as close to matching performance as you are going to get from two very different cards.

Not to mention the GTX970 overclocks better than the 290x does. But yeah, keep holding on to that dream that the 290X is the better card...
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.15/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.08/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
1,400 (0.30/day)
Location
78°55' N, 11°56' E
System Name -aLiEn beaTs-
Processor Intel i7 11700kf @ 5.055Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z490 Unify
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro RGB
Memory G.skill Royal Silver 4400 cl17 @ 4403mhz
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 980TI AMP!Omega Factory OC 1418MHz
Storage Intel SSD 330, Crucial SSD MX300 & MX500
Display(s) Samsung C24FG73 144HZ
Case CoolerMaster HAF 932 USB3.0
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD @ 2.1 Bose acoustimass 5
Power Supply CoolerMaster 850W v2 gold atx 2.52
Mouse Razer viper 8k
Keyboard Logitech G19s
Software Windows 11 Pro 21h2 64Bit
Benchmark Scores ► ♪♫♪♩♬♫♪♭
that leaked chart was almost spot on, this normal 960gtx 128bit is around 760gtx perf./ sightly faster.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,356 (0.50/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
The first 28nm GPU was launched in 2011, that's 3 !!! years ago and counting. The worst node change in history.

Yeah 28nm is dragging on, but I'm pretty sure it's been refined along the way, so it not exactly like the initial 2011 28nm runs.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
2,198 (0.44/day)
Location
So. Cal.
Yeah 28nm is dragging on, but I'm pretty sure it's been refined along the way, so it not exactly like the initial 2011 28nm runs.
God's let's hope so... the initial production was so bad TSMC halted production end Jan-February 212 to fix problems. They tried to hush it hiding it in Chinese New Year slowdown. It took a good 3 weeks to get acceptable production restarted.
 
Top