• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Top-end AMD "Fiji" to Get Fancy SKU Name

Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
1,019 (0.21/day)
Location
Porto
System Name No name / Purple Haze
Processor Phenom II 1100T @ 3.8Ghz / Pentium 4 3.4 EE Gallatin @ 3.825Ghz
Motherboard MSI 970 Gaming/ Abit IC7-MAX3
Cooling CM Hyper 212X / Scythe Andy Samurai Master (CPU) - Modded Ati Silencer 5 rev. 2 (GPU)
Memory 8GB GEIL GB38GB2133C10ADC + 8GB G.Skill F3-14900CL9-4GBXL / 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC4000
Video Card(s) Asus R9 Fury X Strix (4096 SP's/1050 Mhz)/ PowerColor X850XT PE @ (600/1230) AGP + (HD3850 AGP)
Storage Samsung 250 GB / WD Caviar 160GB
Display(s) Benq XL2411T
Audio Device(s) motherboard / Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer Fatal1ty Pro + Front panel
Power Supply Tagan BZ 900W / Corsair HX620w
Mouse Zowie AM
Keyboard Qpad MK-50
Software Windows 7 Pro 64Bit / Windows XP
Benchmark Scores 64CU Fury: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11269229 / X850XT PE http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5532432
Will this be the famed AMD Radeon R9 Zeus card?
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
4,304 (1.11/day)
Location
Texas
System Name SnowFire / The Reinforcer
Processor i7 10700K 5.1ghz (24/7) / 2x Xeon E52650v2
Motherboard Asus Strix Z490 / Dell Dual Socket (R720)
Cooling RX 360mm + 140mm Custom Loop / Dell Stock
Memory Corsair RGB 16gb DDR4 3000 CL 16 / DDR3 128gb 16 x 8gb
Video Card(s) GTX Titan XP (2025mhz) / Asus GTX 950 (No Power Connector)
Storage Samsung 970 1tb NVME and 2tb HDD x4 RAID 5 / 300gb x8 RAID 5
Display(s) Acer XG270HU, Samsung G7 Odyssey (1440p 240hz)
Case Thermaltake Cube / Dell Poweredge R720 Rack Mount Case
Audio Device(s) Realtec ALC1150 (On board)
Power Supply Rosewill Lightning 1300Watt / Dell Stock 750 / Brick
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Logitech G19S
Software Windows 11 Pro / Windows Server 2016
So AMD is just realizing now that names are OP?

So wait, if its just the top end sku this now leaves an interesting opening with where other cards will sit. So are we expecting the Top Fiji to be the only one receiving a name like that and the cut down variants will then fill the void below. To me that means we could be seeing something like the cut down variant being the 390X and the 390 might be the revamped R9 290X.

I guess this would help explain the rebranded R9 285 being where it is. Though its a bit confusing since by that logic a lot of card areas are being ignored including possibly some cut down silicon.
 

the54thvoid

Super Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
13,109 (2.39/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
If you under value your product, it will always be seen as inferior. Even if AMD could make Fiji for pennies, they would need to charge mega bucks to make it seem high end. As shitty as Nvidia's pricing policy is, it doesn't hurt sales.
One month to go and I'm genuinely excited about this card.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,946 (0.63/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
But i don't wanna pay $850 for a GFX card. I want to pay $1500, then i can show all the plebs how much betterer i am than they... /sarcasm

Gotta love the free market, run by greed & stupidity.

If current pricing trends continue this will be the last PC i build, the only component that came down in price since i built my last is the SSD. Eveything else (equivalent) has remained the same or increased in price. Good job :clap:

I don't think you understand Moore'moore (and how it's failing). GPUs are incredibly complex and silicon is maxing out.

Intel is just ripping people off as usual.

Memory manuf. have admitted to price fixing, again. They were sued before, but since laws don't matter anymore...
 
Last edited:

Solaris17

Super Dainty Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
27,067 (3.83/day)
Location
Alabama
System Name RogueOne
Processor Xeon W9-3495x
Motherboard ASUS w790E Sage SE
Cooling SilverStone XE360-4677
Memory 128gb Gskill Zeta R5 DDR5 RDIMMs
Video Card(s) MSI SUPRIM Liquid X 4090
Storage 1x 2TB WD SN850X | 2x 8TB GAMMIX S70
Display(s) 49" Philips Evnia OLED (49M2C8900)
Case Thermaltake Core P3 Pro Snow
Audio Device(s) Moondrop S8's on schitt Gunnr
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-1600
Mouse Razer Viper mini signature edition (mercury white)
Keyboard Monsgeek M3 Lavender, Moondrop Luna lights
VR HMD Quest 3
Software Windows 11 Pro Workstation
Benchmark Scores I dont have time for that.
I dont really understand how or why people are crying about GPUs over $600 they have been like that for years. and if people doubt me I will show you the receipt for my 290X and you can just google news stories about the titan launch and the 980 or all the other GTX X80s for that matter. WTF do people want? This isnt news or shocking the RADEON 9800 PRO back in like 2005 was $300+ at launch. and I hope you have the cognitive ability to notice the technological differences now. and back then everyone said the same thing WTF why isnt this card $150?! QQ rage1one1
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
2,388 (0.62/day)
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
System Name Home Brewed
Processor i9-7900X and i7-8700K
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme & ASUS Prime Z-370 A
Cooling Corsair 280mm AIO & Thermaltake Water 3.0
Memory 64GB DDR4-3000 GSKill RipJaws-V & 32GB DDR4-3466 GEIL Potenza
Video Card(s) 2X-GTX-1080 SLI & 2 GTX-1070Ti 8GB G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage Both have 2TB HDDs for storage, 480GB SSDs for OS, and 240GB SSDs for Steam Games
Display(s) ACER 28" B286HK 4K & Samsung 32" 1080P
Case NZXT Source 540 & Rosewill Rise Chassis
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM1000 & Corsair RM850
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Tournament & Corsair K90
Software Win-10 Professional
Benchmark Scores yes
I want to see the reviews before I jump, but I'm chomping at the bit!

If these new GPUs are that good, I have a friend who will unload his three Titan X cards for a good price. Maybe I'll just get those.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.57/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
I dont really understand how or why people are crying about GPUs over $600 they have been like that for years. and if people doubt me I will show you the receipt for my 290X and you can just google news stories about the titan launch and the 980 or all the other GTX X80s for that matter. WTF do people want? This isnt news or shocking the RADEON 9800 PRO back in like 2005 was $300+ at launch. and I hope you have the cognitive ability to notice the technological differences now. and back then everyone said the same thing WTF why isnt this card $150?! QQ rage1one1
I generally think that most of the griping comes from people who haven't been buying graphics (or hardware in general) very long. Back in the day, $350-400 was the going rate for cutting edge 3D graphics with ~ 2MB of RAM for those of us that used to stump up the cash for ATI's 3D Rage. When the 32MB cards first arrived in 2000, the same thing applied again ( Radeon 7200 64MB, GeForce2 GTS etc.), the same with the 128MB cards (ATI AIW 8500DV, GeForce3 Ti) which started moving into the $500 price bracket. As you say, the 9800 Pro was $300+ (actually closer to $400-450 for many, as was the preceding 9700 Pro and the FX 5900U/5950U, and the following 9800 XT), and the trend continued though the X800 PRO/XT, GeForce 6800U and climbed to $500 with the XT PE and Ultra Extreme - and pretty much stayed there for anyone buying a X1800XT or 7800GTX....then you could tack on an additional $100-150 when the first 512MB cards (7800GTX 512M, and X1900 XTX) arrived.

Some people seem to think that the pricing structure as somehow escalated when the fact is the consumer was somewhat spoiled for a brief number of generations thanks to the R600 debacle that led to AMD targeting the value for money segment with the HD 3870/4870/5870/6970...which accounts for less than three years of product releases of the twenty years consumer 3D graphics have been generally available.
If you buy stuff based on marketing, then you're dumb. Good consumer (for companies), but dumb. I see absolutely no need for a 4K monitor.
Well, if your needs and desires dictated the fortunes of the entire AMD company I could see the relevance, but the company needs to appeal to a wider market than just yourself. You see the market from a personal standpoint, I tend to look at it from the entire customer base.
For the record, I don't see a need for 4K either - especially with OS font issues, lack of native 4K video content, and the nascent state of the 4K monitor market (why bother jumping on the train early when the next wave of panels - and cards- should feature DP1.3 and a wider range of offerings in the 10-bit/IPS class).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
39 (0.01/day)
the problem is the HBM v1 standard is limited to 4GB of ram. the only way they will get to 8GB is if they have 2 chips on the 1 board again. and we all know what that means.... only 4gb is usable! so its not an 8gb card, cause DX11 doesnt support pooling!

AMD major fail with Fuji XT. a 290X with 8gb is still gana be the choice for 4K gamers.
or titanX is a much better option. RIP AMD
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.84/day)
the problem is the HBM v1 standard is limited to 4GB of ram. the only way they will get to 8GB is if they have 2 chips on the 1 board again. and we all know what that means.... only 4gb is usable! so its not an 8gb card, cause DX11 doesnt support pooling!

AMD major fail with Fuji XT. a 290X with 8gb is still gana be the choice for 4K gamers.
or titanX is a much better option. RIP AMD

You missed my post I guess.

AMD's CTO Joe Macri said:
"You're not limited in this world to any number of stacks, but from a capacity point of view, this generation-one HBM, each DRAM is a two-gigabit DRAM, so yeah, if you have four stacks you're limited to four gigabytes. You could build things with more stacks, you could build things with less stacks. Capacity of the frame buffer is just one of our concerns. There are many things you can do to utilise that capacity better. So if you have four stacks you're limited to four [gigabytes], but we don't really view that as a performance limitation from an AMD perspective."

They already hinted they were developing techniques for 8 & 16 stacks. One would suspect the Fiji FirePro to be equipped with more stacks.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
39 (0.01/day)
You missed my post I guess.



They already hinted they were developing techniques for 8 & 16 stacks. One would suspect the Fiji FirePro to be equipped with more stacks.
how does that help me. im not buying a 5,000 video card to play games on man....... its a failure out of the box. this is probably why Nvidia decided not to use HBM1 due to this limitation. Its only going to be for a flagship product which means 4K, and 4gb isnt enough for 4K today! and running a X2 setup its still only going to use 4gb because no pooling!

980 or a 980ti with 6-8gb is looking like a great option when they come out. until HBM becomes mature at HBM v2 and 8GB is possible! and then we will have pascal vs AMD's version (IF they stay open that long. as I said I dont know how AMD are even still alive)
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.84/day)
how does that help me. im not buying a 5,000 video card to play games on man....... its a failure out of the box. this is probably why Nvidia decided not to use HBM1 due to this limitation. Its only going to be for a flagship product which means 4K, and 4gb isnt enough for 4K today! and running a X2 setup its still only going to use 4gb because no pooling!

980 or a 980ti with 6-8gb is looking like a great option when they come out. until HBM becomes mature at HBM v2 and 8GB is possible! and then we will have pascal vs AMD's version (IF they stay open that long. as I said I dont know how AMD are even still alive)

Might want to go back and look at all the Nvidia Pascal screenshots HBM1 4 stacks.

 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.57/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.84/day)
That is a technology demonstrator - not a selling product.
Nvidia have already stated that the shipping product will feature HBM2

I don't discount that. I also suspect both are working on multi stacking. The original HBM1 paper was 4 & 8.

One wouldn't be to quick to discount that both are working on higher stacks for their pro-line in any case and would work its way to the game-line of products

HBM1 8 stacks would give them 8GB at HBM2 16GB makes sense they would work towards a higher stack count be it HBM1 or HBM2
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,190 (0.22/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
the problem is the HBM v1 standard is limited to 4GB of ram. the only way they will get to 8GB is if they have 2 chips on the 1 board again. and we all know what that means.... only 4gb is usable! so its not an 8gb card, cause DX11 doesnt support pooling!

AMD major fail with Fuji XT. a 290X with 8gb is still gana be the choice for 4K gamers.
or titanX is a much better option. RIP AMD


DX12 supports pooling.
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
39 (0.01/day)
I don't discount that. I also suspect both are working on multi stacking. The original HBM1 paper was 4 & 8.

One wouldn't be to quick to discount that both are working on higher stacks for their pro-line in any case and would work its way to the game-line of products

HBM1 8 stacks would give them 8GB at HBM2 16GB makes sense they would work towards a higher stack count be it HBM1 or HBM2

They probably built that with Maxwell and HBM v1, and realized its not worth it yet. and this is why that card is there.
which then they announced they would release Pascal with HBM2 in 2016.
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
39 (0.01/day)
DX12 supports pooling.
it does. I agree. So lets see what happens.

But you cant market a single GPU as a 4k GFX card with only 4gb. and if they say oh you need 2 to do 4K. then thats a complete waste. 290X in Xfire did 4K. so what are we wasting all that extra horsepower on! if there is no memory there to drive the Anti ALiasing and extra textures?
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,190 (0.22/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
it does. I agree. So lets see what happens.

But you cant market a single GPU as a 4k GFX card with only 4gb. and if they say oh you need 2 to do 4K. then thats a complete waste. 290X in Xfire did 4K. so what are we wasting all that extra horsepower on! if there is no memory there to drive the Anti ALiasing and extra textures?

It really depends if DX12 is more efficient in that realm as well... Who knows. Frankly I don't think 8GB is required for 4k.
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
39 (0.01/day)
It really depends if DX12 is more efficient in that realm as well... Who knows. Frankly I don't think 8GB is required for 4k.
I have a samsung 32D 1440P monitor. and I max out 4gb easy! so I can say 4K wld kill 4gb easily!
again they are saying compression tech is getting better etc and less memory is needed. but I remain sceptical.

for me the 980 TI will be a sweet buy if its got 6-8gb of ram. and then if AMD remains alive ill see what they offer with HBM2 and pascal from Nvidia. that way there is real competition. hbm1 will be full of issues I think. fragile links and heat rising to the top Dram chip. Think Xbox360 issues and a billion bucks in write down!
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,190 (0.22/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
Huh, have not noticed maxing out my 4gb card on my ZR30 1600p...
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.57/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Huh, have not noticed maxing out my 4gb card on my ZR30 1600p...
Probably depends upon which titles you play


With consoles having a greater pool of memory to work with, it is probably a safe bet that vRAM usage wont remain static in the foreseeable future.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
14,010 (2.34/day)
Location
Louisiana
Processor Core i9-9900k
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax ETS-T50 Black CPU cooler
Memory 32GB (2x16) Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 4070 Ti Super OC 16GB
Storage 1x 1TB MX500 (OS); 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 2TB MX500; 1x 1TB BX500 SSD; 1x 6TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) Infievo 27" 165Hz @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-1000 Gold
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
I translate this as "AMD is going the expensive route".

And they should. They're not going to get out of their financial hole by selling products cheaply.

If you build quality, people will buy it.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
2,388 (0.62/day)
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
System Name Home Brewed
Processor i9-7900X and i7-8700K
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme & ASUS Prime Z-370 A
Cooling Corsair 280mm AIO & Thermaltake Water 3.0
Memory 64GB DDR4-3000 GSKill RipJaws-V & 32GB DDR4-3466 GEIL Potenza
Video Card(s) 2X-GTX-1080 SLI & 2 GTX-1070Ti 8GB G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage Both have 2TB HDDs for storage, 480GB SSDs for OS, and 240GB SSDs for Steam Games
Display(s) ACER 28" B286HK 4K & Samsung 32" 1080P
Case NZXT Source 540 & Rosewill Rise Chassis
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM1000 & Corsair RM850
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Tournament & Corsair K90
Software Win-10 Professional
Benchmark Scores yes
If you build quality, people will buy it.

^^^This^^^

If I perceive that it's worth it, (after reading reviews and comments from others who already have it) and I can get the cash together, I'll buy it.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,357 (0.89/day)
Location
Mexico
System Name Dell-y Driver
Processor Core i5-10400
Motherboard Asrock H410M-HVS
Cooling Intel 95w stock cooler
Memory 2x8 A-DATA 2999Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) UHD 630
Storage 1TB WD Green M.2 - 4TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Asus PA248 1920x1200 IPS
Case Dell Vostro 270S case
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Dell 220w
Software Windows 10 64bit
It's not that HBM is limited to 4GB, is just that the interposer AMD will use for Fiji is designed for 4 stacks only. Theoretically you could fit as many as the space allows but then again HBM costs more than GDDR5 so I think that the 4 stack limit was set for economical reasons. Once HBM2 hits, each stack will be 2GB and so 8GB cards would be possible under AMD's current implementation.

The nVidia Pascal HBM design also has 4 stacks only but they will wait for HBM2 before using it.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.54/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Well, yes, the interposer specifically. Thank you for that clarification (edited my post to be more clear).

My underlying point should still stand though considering Fiji is HBM and not HBM2 and using that interposer, correct? So there will not be an 8GB card out of the gate.
 
Top