• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

AMD Radeon Graphics Roadmap for 2015 Leaked

Yes, that is the greatest board game all time!

But yeah monopoly is not wanted situation, even current duopoly is kind of lame(and I mean especially dgpus).

I know AMD isn't putting up as much of a fight as we'd all like... my point was mainly that hoping "NVIDIA wins!" is a bad thing. We want AMD to put up a fight, for everyone.

So even if you don't plan to buy it, you should hope the Fury is awesome.
 
My disappointment isn't for AMD or Nvidia. I'm disappointed that we've been stuck on the 28nm process for over 3 years and there's only so much that either company can do to increase performance by a lot. Next year will be the leap in performance with 16nm Pascal and 14nm Arctic Islands. Performance per watt should go up a good bit.

As far a VRAM usage there are games that use over 4 GB and there will likely be more in this console life cycle.

memory.gif


"Eight GB of memory would have been more than enough, and, in my opinion, future-proof. Even today, the 6 GB of the two-year-old Titan are too much as 4 GB is enough for all titles to date. Both the Xbox One and PS4 have 8 GB of VRAM of which 5 GB and 4.5 GB are, respectively, available to games, so I seriously doubt developers will exceed that amount any time soon."

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_Titan_X/33.html
 
With HD4000 I "only" had HD4850, but I don't remember HD4950 even existing back then...
Only with series 6000 they introduced x9xx notation for a single GPU cards. Before that flagships were HD3870, HD4870 and HD5870.
I used to have HD4870, it was a great card for DX10 era. I regret never owning 5000 series back when it was fresh, in retrospective it was really stupid of me going green team just before Evergreen series was out. There I was with a brand new GTX 260 sp 216, reading reviews about 5870 and weeping :laugh:
 
Yeah, the HD5850 that I had doubled the performance of HD4850 (that I had before). It was a 100% increase in performance. That was a really great release by AMD (or was it still ATi back then, I forgot).
 
seems fine! i dont get why people are bitching about.. if what you buy does what you wanted it to do.. why are you bitching????
 
Yeah, the HD5850 that I had doubled the performance of HD4850 (that I had before). It was a 100% increase in performance. That was a really great release by AMD (or was it still ATi back then, I forgot).
HD 2### were the last developed exclusively by ATI. HD 5### were the last to have ATI branding; HD 6### were AMD branded.
 
I consider RADEON 9700 and HD 5870 the greatest achievements from red team, those cards doubled the performance at the same price when they became king of the hill. Also first DX9 and first DX11 chips.
They had similar success with 7970 to a lesser extent because of the pricing. I feel that if they could've produced it (or price it) cheaper, they'd taken back their piece of the market.
I have a good feeling about Fury, they just need to patch up their drivers. I sure hope they have found enough developers, they are currently looking for 290 more workers, 19 of those have something to do with drivers and software development, such as this one https://www.amd.apply2jobs.com/ProfExt/index.cfm?fuseaction=mExternal.showJob&RID=30763&CurrentPage=1
guess things are happening ... wheels are in motion
 
GTA5 wants 6 GiB for 4K. Many games will follow thanks to games turning 64-bit, Direct3D 12, and consoles having 8 GiB of memory. Everything that previously stopped games from using ridiculous amounts of memory are now gone--the sky is the limit and 4 GiB isn't a very high limit.

I am running 3x 28" 4K monitors and my GTA5 hits 11Gb totally maxed out.
 
Over last ~20yrs the best card I've owned as far as longevity goes would be the 8800GTX. 9800 Pro would come 2nd except I killed it :D.

I currently have a 7950 VaporX Rev2, bought it 2yrs ago and right now it's about to place 1st equal beside the 8000GTX... :)

I don't like the whole rebranding thing....I know both teams do it but it's dishonest marketing imho...
 
HD7950. I have no real reason to replace it other than curiosity.
 
Well, it's a good core, you have to admit that. I'm running EVERYTHING maxed out at 1080p and I very much prefer to use FSAA. So yeah, still quite a lot of grunt for such an old card. But like I said, I'm a curios creature, I want to experience new hardware even if there is no real need. I'll just crank up something, FSAA if there is nothing else. Or just use VSR...

Only game where I'd need more grunt is Natural Selection 2 though. That game is more demanding than GTA5 in late game when teams make tons of structures...
 
Well, it's a good core, you have to admit that. I'm running EVERYTHING maxed out at 1080p and I very much prefer to use FSAA. So yeah, still quite a lot of grunt for such an old card. But like I said, I'm a curios creature, I want to experience new hardware even if there is no real need. I'll just crank up something, FSAA if there is nothing else. Or just use VSR...

Only game where I'd need more grunt is Natural Selection 2 though. That game is more demanding than GTA5 in late game when teams make tons of structures...
Yep and compared to Cayman the difference is like night & day.
After overclocking my 7950, overall performance was nearly double that of a 6950 it replaced. Usually I wait a couple gens before upgrading, I made an exception....glad I did.


Shame AMD's engineers are let down by a lousy driver team.
 
These so called rebranded card better have HDMI 2.0,.......
 
Don't know why they wouldn't. HDMI is not difficult for a PC graphics card to do.
 
Soooo... R9 390 and 390x will be rebrands/refined versions of the 290 and 290x and the next gen HBM stuff will be Fiji and FijiXT?

Makes sense I guess if refined versions are able to keep up with nvidias options at price for performance levels.

Ahh no. Consider these two points:

R9-290x is being rebranded as the R9-380. R9-390x and Fury are not rebrands because they will have different types of memory setups and more streaming processors then the previous generation. Fury is having 4 GBs HBM and R9-390x is having 8 GB VRam. In a sense, these are the GTX 980ti and GTX Titan-X variant, flagship tiers on the AMD side for this generation. GTX Titan with full GM200 and 12 GBs VRam will be in competition with R9-390x for 4k performance supremacy. GTX 980ti, the dumb-down step-child of the GTX Titan-x, is going up against the Fury XT which will beat both GTX Titan-X and 980 Ti in FPS Performance due to HBM. Both R9-390x and Fury will both run 4096 SP.

or

If you want to look at it from another point of view, NVidia 400 to 500 to 600 to 700 to 900 series could be looked at as rebrands of one another. The only differences is the changes between Fermi to kep to Maxwell being the only small difference besides a change in the framebuffer. If people want to call R9-390x a rebrand/refine version of R9-290x, then what I just stated just now is true too. AMD 4000 series got rebranded into the 5000 series, then the 6000 series, then the 7000 series, then the R9-200 series, etc... The main point being that just little 15% to 50% increases were made in between each generation, both AMD and Nvidia, due to rebranding different generations for less than stellar performance increases. Performance increases being the worst on NVidia's end, but that's heavily subjected by every individual's preferences and views on "performance." Difference of 64 Watts doesn't mean crap to a lot, but it's a big deal to NVidia fanboys. Spending $200 dollars more for the GTX 780 Ti over R9-290x for + 10 FPS was really worth it to some...


I think the term "rebrand" is being misused across the web regarding these GPU's. While they have done actual rebrands (IE HD 7970 becomes R9 280X) that offer no improvements over the previous generation (Minus clock bumps) these new chips are all being refined similar to the Tonga R9 285 which bring improvements and new features across the board instead of just an increase in clocks speeds and ram. The chips will be improved upon in more ways than one if the R9 285 was any indication especially now a days where it sits on the board currently in relation to the other R9 series chips. They already confirmed that the R9 370+ were on the newest version of GCN so it depends on what that all entails but these are not just straight up rebrands.

+ 10


Another thing to consider:
GTX 960 = GTX 780 Ti
GTX 760 = GTX 680

In general:

Hypocrisy amongst other TPU members calling AMD out on their rebrands is pretty high since NVidia was the first to do it. Lets look the other way when NVidia does it, but cry like a Bit*** because AMD started copying them. Wa wa! I remember a quote from our very own Humansmoke who told somebody, explaining the hatred between AMD and NVidia fanboys. With Humansmoke siding with the NVidia fanboys, he made a claim that AMD Fanboys are "divorced from reality." Sadly, this little trick of demonizing the other side with their own faults and defects is pretty pathetic on the Green Camp's part, and the only other group of people low enough to resort to this Aquarius-form of tactics and rhetoric is the Republican Party.... Lawls, shots fired! As for the idiots who want NVidia to be a monopoly, you are basically saying you want AMD to die in a raging fire, and your performance increases each proceeding generation after NVidia becomes a monopoly, to only increase by 1% for a flat rate of $200.00 per generation, and no more Titans or 15% performance improvements. GG NVidia Fanboys.

On a side note, I am not an AMD Fanboy. You may mis-construde that because their is an abundants of ignorant people in the world. I'm actually investing in 2 Titan-X for the purposes of using them for 3D animation and content creation, but I am holding out for 3rd party benches on AMD Fury....
 
Yep and compared to Cayman the difference is like night & day.
After overclocking my 7950, overall performance was nearly double that of a 6950 it replaced. Usually I wait a couple gens before upgrading, I made an exception....glad I did.


Shame AMD's engineers are let down by a lousy driver team.

My poor 6950 :(
Im already annoyed enough by my friends performance with their 7950 grrr no need for salt in the wound!
 
Back
Top