- Joined
- Feb 18, 2005
- Messages
- 6,393 (0.87/day)
- Location
- Ikenai borderline!
System Name | Firelance. |
---|---|
Processor | Threadripper 3960X |
Motherboard | ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming |
Cooling | IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12 |
Memory | 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16 |
Video Card(s) | MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC |
Storage | 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data) |
Display(s) | Dell S3221QS(A) (32" 38x21 60Hz) + 2x AOC Q32E2N (32" 25x14 75Hz) |
Case | Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans |
Power Supply | Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W |
Mouse | Logitech G604 |
Keyboard | Razer Pro Type Ultra |
Software | Windows 10 Professional x64 |
You've never used this KillerNIC. Might be a bit quick to judge here.
I've never had cancer either, but that doesn't mean I intend to get it just to find out if it's really as bad as everyone says.
Every review I've read of motherboards with Killer NIC has them performing the same, or worse, than Intel's offerings (within statistical margins of error). There have also been many issues reported with the Killer NIC software, including but not limited to high CPU usage and BSODs. There's a thread on MSI's forum about how to remove the Killer NIC software and install generic Qualcomm drivers to avoid these issues. There's a thread here about how to do the exact same thing.
In contrast, I have never had a bad experience with an Intel ethernet adapter. From my first Pentium 3 board to my current Ivy Bridge, every Intel NIC I've used has installed and worked and given me zero trouble. The Internet agrees with me.
Killer NIC is snake oil BS that Qualcomm is dumping into the market at discounted rates to gain market share. MSI would rather save a few pennies and put these on their boards than stump up for decent Intel hardware; I would rather support a motherboard manufacturer that doesn't cheap out on their customers.