- Joined
- Feb 18, 2005
- Messages
- 5,847 (0.81/day)
- Location
- Ikenai borderline!
System Name | Firelance. |
---|---|
Processor | Threadripper 3960X |
Motherboard | ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming |
Cooling | IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12 |
Memory | 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16 |
Video Card(s) | MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC |
Storage | 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data) |
Display(s) | 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz) |
Case | Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans |
Power Supply | Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W |
Mouse | Logitech G602 |
Keyboard | Razer Pro Type Ultra |
Software | Windows 10 Professional x64 |
Why do you want to look like a complete ignorant Nvidia fanboy ? Where were you when Nvidia's WHQL drivers were killing Nvidia Graphic cards ? Infact Nvidia did that twice ...
I presume you're talking about the 196.75 and 320.18 drivers? Those were a f**kup and I've never claimed otherwise.
Don't have a reason to update WHQL for several months... you're not working hard enough, fix a Beta-bug in like a day and half and your not doing enough.
It sounds like the issue many of our members talked about, and AMD heard and investigate. And somehow that's not good?
Not good enough, when your beta drivers are effectively your WHQL drivers:
Beta drivers have the advantage of including new CrossFire profiles and is the only way to get them. If you want the most current game support for CrossFire, Beta drivers are a must.
For Single-GPU beta drivers also include new game support or tweaks or performance optimizations for newly released games. If you want the latest game optimizations for single-GPU, Beta drivers are a must.
[/url]
how does that that have anything to do with this _beta_ driver? are you expecting amd to test all product configurations for a beta release?
at least amd beta releases never break cards like nvidias whql sometimes do
A YouTube video of a guy with graphical corruption and a picture of a burned-out PC proves... what, exactly?