- Joined
- Jul 25, 2008
- Messages
- 14,019 (2.34/day)
- Location
- Louisiana
Processor | Core i9-9900k |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6 |
Cooling | All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax ETS-T50 Black CPU cooler |
Memory | 32GB (2x16) Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200 |
Video Card(s) | ASUS RTX 4070 Ti Super OC 16GB |
Storage | 1x 1TB MX500 (OS); 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 2TB MX500; 1x 1TB BX500 SSD; 1x 6TB WD Blue storage (eSATA) |
Display(s) | Infievo 27" 165Hz @ 2560 x 1440 |
Case | Fractal Design Define R4 Black -windowed |
Audio Device(s) | Soundblaster Z |
Power Supply | Seasonic Focus GX-1000 Gold |
Mouse | Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!) |
Keyboard | Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches) |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed) |
Hmm looks like the GTX "1080" will have a core count that is a bit lower than the 980ti (despite crazy rumors) AND have 50% lower band width, possibly 4gb and 8gb variants.
So.....the 1080 (or whatever it shall be) with 256-bit bus has 50% less bandwidth than the 256-bit bus of the 980? Am I understanding your complaint right?
It fills the same slot the 980 does now (upper mid-level), so I'm not sure why you would compare it to 980Ti. Is it very likely to equal or come very close to the 980Ti in performance? Yes, which is a win all around for consumers, as it will be cheaper than the current 980Ti flagship.
Last edited: