cdawall
where the hell are my stars
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Messages
- 27,683 (4.10/day)
- Location
- Houston
System Name | Moving into the mobile space |
---|---|
Processor | 7940HS |
Motherboard | HP trash |
Cooling | HP trash |
Memory | 2x8GB |
Video Card(s) | 4070 mobile |
Storage | 512GB+2TB NVME |
Display(s) | some 165hz thing that isn't as nice as it sounded |
Sure I get it. But I disagree with it is all. Quad cores have been at the high end of the mainstream for a decade now, and while there are few reasons for it to move to more cores ... it would still be nice, and we're getting there performance-wise. The next gen from Intel should be (on desktop) like now, but bumped up a step. IE 2C/4T for Celeron/Pentium (maybe apart from the €30 CPU's), 4C/4T for i3's and 4C/8T for i5s and 6C/12T (and maybe even 8C/16T Xeon parts for mainstream) for i7's. But then they'd step on their own toes and their precious market segmentation. I just like the idea to start a build with a Celeron and end up with a sixteen thread monster.
Why? Is there some mystical software that an average user has that actually needs more than a 4C/8T?