AMD Ryzen 1700X, 1600X & 1300 Benchmarks Leaked

nemesis.ie · Feb 18, 2017

Intel: "And we would have got away with too if it weren't for you pesky AMD folks."

eidairaman1 · Feb 18, 2017

pissing match

rruff · Feb 18, 2017

moproblems99 said:
I'm not sure why everyone is so stuck on today. Sure, there aren't many apps that are optimized for more than a couple threads. But could that be because more than 4 cores have been relatively prohibitively expensive for the majority of people for the last several years?

If you are going to complain about the number of cores in Ryzen, you may as well complain about cars that have more than 200hp because most speed limits are under 65mph / 100kmh.

Nah, it's because most CPU tasks are difficult to parallelize. Forget 4 threads, most will only run at single thread speed. If you are running a bunch of hungry apps simultaneously, or one of those rare tasks that can be efficiently split, then the more threads the better. But reality makes the single thread speed super important most of the time. That isn't going to change.

The better analogy would be a race car where you worry about how many cylinders the engine has, rather than how long it takes to complete the course.

notb · Feb 19, 2017

TheLaughingMan said:
Intel did know, they are a little concerned. Intel has too much market share, too much money, and too many CPUs. They are clearly concerned with the sudden announcement during these rumors about an unlocked i3 chip, possible i5 with HyperThreading (which is stupid), and two new SKUs for Kaby Lake this early. But nothing is stopping Intel from lower the price of older gen chips to compete over price even if AMD is faster than those chips.

To me the i3 -K chip is just totally pointless. It's designed for people with small budget that want to try out OC more than anything else. As such I'm really to old and lazy to be excited. Problem is: IMO I'm representing the market quite well in this regard.
There was a time when everyone was overclocking and AMD was the CPU brand of choice. Older forum users will remember processors like the Athlon XP 1700+. We were all fascinated by it's abilities. Back then you didn't just order a CPU - you looked for the best series, because they had different OC characteristics. And it was way before large tower coolers or factory-bilt watercooling became so popular. People were actually making watercooling sets from things they got at a home improvement supply shop and they were leaking all the time.

Just think how much this whole market matured since then. Overclocking used to be an adventure that lured us all. Every page of PC part manuals told you that overclocking is pure evil and that you'll almost surely be killed if you try it. And now it's 2017: motherboards have auto overclocking modes doing everything for you, while efficient factory-built watercooling solutions are easier to get than a fresh croissant on Sunday.
I admit the current Intel offer isn't perfect, but is this cheap OC-friendly CPU what we actually need?

TheLaughingMan said:
And since you don't know that Intel has been price hiking because they had no competition.....well that. AMD will not be losing any money at these prices. Intel has just been over charging for years.

Honestly, I don't see this. Intel is (clearly) overcharging for the LGA 2011 processors (the socket itself being just a way to suck more cash on "specialized" motherboards etc), but as far as I can remember the prices in "consumer" segment looked pretty much the same. Under $100 for a decent entry-level gaming/multimedia CPU and around $200-400 for something that will work well for the next 3-5 years. So I would say the pricing for everything for LGA 1151 seems right (or what I would expect). AMD has always been the cheaper company, so it's not like Intel will drop prices just because AMD offers the same for 10% less.

Truth be told, software requirements slowed down lately and Intel took advantage of that concentrating more on power efficiency. Let's remember the problems for AMD started not because they couldn't match Intel's most powerful CPUs, but because they totally lost the battle for notebooks.
And even now we don't see much information about Ryzen mobile versions. So what is AMD hoping to achieve other than maybe regaining a few % market share coming from high-end gaming desktops?

rruff · Feb 19, 2017

notb said:
And even now we don't see much information about Ryzen mobile versions. So what is AMD hoping to achieve other than maybe regaining a few % market share coming from high-end gaming desktops?

Since AMD has gotten to be a pretty small company, they have to pick their battles.

Ryzen isn't going to beat 7700k gaming. The real strength will be applications that use the extra threads. I don't know if you noticed, but AMD has announced a full consumer lineup starting at $129. Server chips shouldn't be too far behind.

HD64G · Feb 19, 2017

I can already see many people trying to downplay the big achievement of AMD Ryzen being very close in IPC to the last 2 gens of Intel's CPUs. Not a good sign of them being smart customers. And signs are that the X models will overclock up to 5GHz on air, so the gamers won't be dissappointed either from Ryzen if leaks are genuine.

efikkan · Feb 19, 2017

And people keeps pretending they know the chip's IPC without sufficient data… These CPUs have XFR, so this has to be disabled if you want to measure IPC, I'm sure someone will do this after the release.

Ryzen will have ~33% higher peak integer throughput per clock, so it will perform well in certain benchmarks, but always remember that pre-release benchmarks are always cherry-picked. We'll have to see how good the rest of the chip is; the front end, cache, etc.

kruk · Feb 19, 2017

efikkan said:
... but always remember that pre-release benchmarks are always cherry-picked.

I agree with your XFR hypothesis, but it's really hard to believe leaked benchmarks are cherry picked. I mean, isn't Cinebench a FPU heavy benchmark? And that is all that is floating around these days. Think about it ...

EarthDog · Feb 19, 2017

HD64G said:
I can already see many people trying to downplay the big achievement of AMD Ryzen being very close in IPC to the last 2 gens of Intel's CPUs. Not a good sign of them being smart customers. And signs are that the X models will overclock up to 5GHz on air, so the gamers won't be dissappointed either from Ryzen if leaks are genuine.

Where are those signs? I've heard a sign I trust (person) say that it reached 5.7-5.8 on ln2 so far... if that is true, that doesn't bode well for 5ghz daily clocks, especially on air.

Here's to hoping he's wrong and it scales better for the extreme guys, and reaches mid 4ghz+ for the rest!

nemesis.ie · Feb 19, 2017

Canard PC mentioned 5GHz on a single core, on air, I believe. I think that was also an ES sample with the power/XFR stuff not enabled.

They also mention the VRMs of the used board to not be up to the job of powering more than one core ...

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5l33or/canard_pc_confirms_5_ghz_ryzen_oc_only_on_1_core/

EarthDog · Feb 19, 2017

Thank you!

That doesn't bode well either... single core??? Not a daily situation there...

And they didn't show squat at ces...

Patriot · Feb 19, 2017

kruk said:
I agree with your XFR hypothesis, but it's really hard to believe leaked benchmarks are cherry picked. I mean, isn't Cinebench a FPU heavy benchmark? And that is all that is floating around these days. Think about it ...

Meh, Cinebench is Intel compiler optimized...
If anything it shines poorly on AMD rigs in general.

lilunxm12 · Feb 19, 2017

Grings said:
Why is i5 with hyper threading still a stupid idea?

They recently gave it to pentiums, making clock speed the only difference from 3mb cache i3's, and are just about to face an onslaught of amd chips with more than 4 threads in the i5's price bracket

AVX and AES are exclusive to core i series (except server oriented J series). That could be a big difference for some users. HT-enabled i5 and normal i7 do not have such significant difference.

moproblems99 · Feb 19, 2017

EarthDog said:
Friend, we've been waiting on the 'core revolution' since q6600. Even now, a native quad is plenty for most...

I agree to a point. The world is not about need. Again, if that was the case, everyone would have Ford Escorts and VW Jettas because that is plenty.

The difference here is that we MAY be getting Corvettes for the price of Escorts.

EarthDog · Feb 19, 2017

Exactly my point. Everyone has wood over Moar cores...which for most aren't really used past 4c/8t. It's nice to have, undoubtedly, even better if you can use them. I feel these are going to be around 5-10% slower IPC over BW-e. That is great for amd and certainly plenty to put them back in the game, particularly at the reported price points. But the amount of cores really won't matter much if you already have a 4c8/t cpu.

cdawall · Feb 19, 2017

EarthDog said:
Exactly my point. Everyone has wood over Moar cores...which for most aren't really used past 4c/8t. It's nice to have, undoubtedly, even better if you can use them. I feel these are going to be around 5-10% slower IPC over BW-e. That is great for amd and certainly plenty to put them back in the game, particularly at the reported price points. But the amount of cores really won't matter much if you already have a 4c8/t cpu.

So you are in the same boat as me ivy bridge e like performance...

efikkan · Feb 19, 2017

Patriot said:
Meh, Cinebench is Intel compiler optimized...
If anything it shines poorly on AMD rigs in general.

What do you mean by "Intel compiler optimized"?
Zen is quite different from Bulldozer, so it should scale differently. Zen seems even "better" than Intel in terms of superscalar abilities, with 4 ALUs and 2 FPUs (seemingly) on separate execution ports, while Intel have three ports with combined ALUs and FPUs. So there will be certain fairly well written software that scales slightly better on "better" superscalar CPUs, giving Zen an edge. Unfortunately most software wouldn't.

zo0lykas · Feb 19, 2017

RRRRryyyyyyZZEeeeeEEnnnn !!!!

TheGuruStud · Feb 19, 2017

efikkan said:
What do you mean by "Intel compiler optimized"?
Zen is quite different from Bulldozer, so it should scale differently. Zen seems even "better" than Intel in terms of superscalar abilities, with 4 ALUs and 2 FPUs (seemingly) on separate execution ports, while Intel have three ports with combined ALUs and FPUs. So there will be certain fairly well written software that scales slightly better on "better" superscalar CPUs, giving Zen an edge. Unfortunately most software wouldn't.

http://www.agner.org/optimize/blog/read.php?i=49 This was how most (if not virtually all) things ran before. It was intentional.

Using old code paths means lower performance.

Vlada011 · Feb 19, 2017

Now we will see why X99 platform was smarter decision.
Because i7-6700K and i7-7700K overclocked will not be able to reach even Ryzen 5 in multi threaded application.
Price and value of Maxmus Extreme and Formula will be reduced significantly.

From other side our 3 years old platform is still alive and we need only CPU change for same or more performance than premium AMD.
Intel x86 domination is over but Intel have space to delay Skylake Xtreme and optimize him nicely and in mean time to start production of Intel i7-6900K and i7-6950X with reduced price.
For 400 and 700$ they will sell 100.000 processors. Their performance improvements after OC is up to 40%.
Many owners have chipset and premium motherboards and memory and need only better CPU.
Owners of i7-5820K, i7-5930K, i7-6800K and i7-6850K will have chance to install 8 and 10 cores.
Better to change only CPU than whole platform. Price of Rampage series will stay similar because they work and with Intel Xeon with far more cores.
We are even in better position, Quad Channel memory and after overclocking Cache frequency our performance will be better than AMD.
We will see... Everything is possible. I vote for delay of Skylake Xtreme and production of 8 and 10 cores Broadwell-EX with competitive price with AMD.

Aaaaa... Haahahaaaa
I'm very smart, Intel could put me as manager I will work on destroying AMDs hype sending performance of overclocked i7-6900K and i7-6950X and their price on Newegg will be
450$ and 650$... Intel X99 re-birth and stabb AMDs Ryzen from back. Name of Topic...
After 3 years STILL DOMINATE Intel Wellsburg - X99 with i7-6900K and i7-6950X.

And that's full experience, it's not only competitive CPU performance, offer everything as newest AMD chipset and more, NVMe, USB 3.1 Gen 2, SATA Express, Quad Channel, faster DDR4, overclocking Cache Frequency, and what customers love most overclocking CPU, performance improvements up to 40% after OC i7-6900K and i7-6950X.

m1dg3t · Feb 19, 2017

Thread need some LoLoLoLs

zo0lykas said:
just one word, IDIOT

Don't be 'that' guy

MxPhenom 216 · Feb 20, 2017

Vlada011 said:
Now we will see why X99 platform was smarter decision.
Because i7-6700K and i7-7700K overclocked will not be able to reach even Ryzen 5 in multi threaded application.
Price and value of Maxmus Extreme and Formula will be reduced significantly.

From other side our 3 years old platform is still alive and we need only CPU change for same or more performance than premium AMD.
Intel x86 domination is over but Intel have space to delay Skylake Xtreme and optimize him nicely and in mean time to start production of Intel i7-6900K and i7-6950X with reduced price.
For 400 and 700$ they will sell 100.000 processors. Their performance improvements after OC is up to 40%.
Many owners have chipset and premium motherboards and memory and need only better CPU.
Owners of i7-5820K, i7-5930K, i7-6800K and i7-6850K will have chance to install 8 and 10 cores.
Better to change only CPU than whole platform. Price of Rampage series will stay similar because they work and with Intel Xeon with far more cores.
We are even in better position, Quad Channel memory and after overclocking Cache frequency our performance will be better than AMD.
We will see... Everything is possible. I vote for delay of Skylake Xtreme and production of 8 and 10 cores Broadwell-EX with competitive price with AMD.

Aaaaa... Haahahaaaa
I'm very smart, Intel could put me as manager I will work on destroying AMDs hype sending performance of overclocked i7-6900K and i7-6950X and their price on Newegg will be
450$ and 650$... Intel X99 re-birth and stabb AMDs Ryzen from back. Name of Topic...
After 3 years STILL DOMINATE Intel Wellsburg - X99 with i7-6900K and i7-6950X.

And that's full experience, it's not only competitive CPU performance, offer everything as newest AMD chipset and more, NVMe, USB 3.1 Gen 2, SATA Express, Quad Channel, faster DDR4, overclocking Cache Frequency, and what customers love most overclocking CPU, performance improvements up to 40% after OC i7-6900K and i7-6950X.

Delusional....

TheLaughingMan · Feb 20, 2017

notb said:
Let's remember the problems for AMD started not because they couldn't match Intel's most powerful CPUs, but because they totally lost the battle for notebooks. And even now we don't see much information about Ryzen mobile versions. So what is AMD hoping to achieve other than maybe regaining a few % market share coming from high-end gaming desktops?

Ironically entry level notebooks is the one market AMD still has a solid presence in. The APUs there have been doing ok. The issue is AMD lost in every single other market. Server space, high-end performance, mid-range desktops, professional PC market, etc. AMD lost respect because they could not compete with the higher end market space. Reviews, word of mouth, advertisement, etc. all steam from Intel being able to say without question they were the best you could buy. "We are less expensive" was not going to cut it especially when their chips use more energy. The high-end gamer market is more like a proving ground if you will. Can you hold your own in a market that really only cares about performance, will push everything to the limit, and will enjoy dissecting where the weaknesses are. IF that turns out well then AMD will have third-party material to back their claims.

AMD doesn't care about selling a few thousand chips to people like me and you. But if we can provided them the "proof" that their chips are exactly what they say, then they will be in a better position to renegotiate their console contracts, better position to sell 100K+ chips to a server hosting service, and enter markets like mid and high-end laptops and tablets.

Relayer · Feb 20, 2017

IF the leaks are true what will Intel do? I don't think they can compete on price. AMD has a much lower overhead and Intel shareholders aren't going to be happy if they just cut their profits that dramatically.

Vlada011 · Feb 20, 2017

Relayer said:
IF the leaks are true what will Intel do? I don't think they can compete on price. AMD has a much lower overhead and Intel shareholders aren't going to be happy if they just cut their profits that dramatically.

Why you think Intel will not be happy if price drop? They charge much more than real value and they have huge profit even if they ask 800$ for i7-6950X and 500$ for i7-6900K.
That's almost as they didn't change nothing from previous years. They usually ask 1000$ for Xtreme... this year they have chance for 700$ more per Processor. Such profit give them oportunity to drop price later. Intel could sell a lot of Broadwell-EX if drop price, they could start again production and sell one more circle for lower price and don't need to launch nothing in premium segment next 18 months, until Skylake Xtreme is not ready.
Customers will be very satisfied and happy to see that same chipset old almost 3 years give them opportunity to beat AMD premium Ryzen.
People love such things when life time of one generation is longer, no situation or feature where AMD is in advantage to Broadwell-EX.
OK Intel don't need to sell only 8 and 10 cores. Whole Broadwell-EX line price will drop...
Example 200, 280, 450 and 800$. And they are in game, prices are only little reduced compare to Nehalem, Sandy Bridge-E, Ivy Bridge-E and Haswell-E, just little.

I will not allow you to enjoy in Ryzen completely... hahahaa hahahaa.

System Name	7950X
Processor	R9 7950X
Motherboard	Asus X670 Hero
Cooling	Noctua DH15 black edition
Memory	64GB (4 x 16GB) 6000 MT/s
Video Card(s)	Radeon RX7900XT
Storage	Firecuda 540
Display(s)	Samsung Q95T
Audio Device(s)	On board
Power Supply	Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse	Roccat Leadr
Keyboard	K95 RGB
Software	Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores	#1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)

System Name	PCGOD
Processor	AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard	Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling	Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory	16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s)	AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage	Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s)	NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case	AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s)	Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply	Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse	Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard	Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software	Windows 7 Pro 64

Processor	AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard	MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling	ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory	2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s)	Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage	Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s)	AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case	SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s)	Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply	Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse	Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard	Trust GXT280
Software	Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux

Processor	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X \|\|\| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard	ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR \|\|\| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling	Noctua NH-U14S \|\|\| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory	Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz \|\|\| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s)	MSI GTX 1060 3GB \|\|\| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage	Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB \|\|\| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s)	Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" \|\|\| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case	Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s)	Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply	Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse	Razer Abyssus
Keyboard	CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software	Ubuntu

System Name	7950X
Processor	R9 7950X
Motherboard	Asus X670 Hero
Cooling	Noctua DH15 black edition
Memory	64GB (4 x 16GB) 6000 MT/s
Video Card(s)	Radeon RX7900XT
Storage	Firecuda 540
Display(s)	Samsung Q95T
Audio Device(s)	On board
Power Supply	Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse	Roccat Leadr
Keyboard	K95 RGB
Software	Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores	#1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)

AMD Ryzen 1700X, 1600X & 1300 Benchmarks Leaked

nemesis.ie

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman

rruff

notb

rruff

HD64G

efikkan

kruk

EarthDog

nemesis.ie

EarthDog

Patriot

lilunxm12

moproblems99

EarthDog

cdawall

where the hell are my stars

efikkan

zo0lykas

TheGuruStud

Vlada011

m1dg3t

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer

TheLaughingMan

Relayer

Vlada011

System Name	[H]arbringer
Processor	4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard	SM GL
Cooling	3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory	16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s)	blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage	32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s)	headless
Case	Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s)	yawn
Power Supply	Antec 1200w HCP
Software	Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores	http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww

Processor	i7 4930k
Motherboard	Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling	Thermalright HR-02 Macho
Memory	4 X 4096 MB G.Skill DDR3 1866 9-10-9-26
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte GV-N780OC-3GD
Storage	Crucial M4 128GB, M500 240GB, Samsung HD103SJ 1TB
Display(s)	Planar PX2710MW 27" 1920x1080
Case	Corsair 500R
Power Supply	RAIDMAX RX-1200AE
Software	Windows 10 64-bit

System Name	Wut?
Processor	3900X
Motherboard	ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling	Water
Memory	32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s)	Vega 56
Storage	2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s)	3440 x 1440
Case	Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply	Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum

System Name	Moving into the mobile space
Processor	7940HS
Motherboard	HP trash
Cooling	HP trash
Memory	2x8GB
Video Card(s)	4070 mobile
Storage	512GB+2TB NVME
Display(s)	some 165hz thing that isn't as nice as it sounded

Processor	5800x
Motherboard	b550-e
Cooling	full - custom liquid loop
Memory	cl16 - 32gb
Video Card(s)	6800xt
Storage	nvme 1TB + ssd 750gb
Display(s)	xg32vc
Case	hyte y60
Power Supply	1000W - gold
Software	10

Processor	OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard	Asucks C6H
Cooling	Air
Memory	32GB
Video Card(s)	OCed 9070XT red devil
Storage	NVMees
Display(s)	32" Dull curved 1440
Case	Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s)	Sennheiser, Custom 5.1
Power Supply	Don't even remember

System Name	Intel® X99 Wellsburg
Processor	Intel® Core™ i7-5820K - 4.5GHz
Motherboard	ASUS Rampage V E10 (1801)
Cooling	EK RGB Monoblock + EK XRES D5 Revo Glass PWM
Memory	CMD16GX4M4A2666C15
Video Card(s)	ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon
Storage	Samsung 970 EVO PLUS 1TB /850 EVO 1TB / WD Black 2TB
Display(s)	Samsung P2450H
Case	Lian Li PC-O11 WXC
Audio Device(s)	CREATIVE Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply	EVGA 1200 P2 Platinum
Mouse	Logitech G900 / SS QCK
Keyboard	Deck 87 Francium Pro
Software	Windows 10 Pro x64

System Name	m1dg3t \| DeathBox \| HairPi 3
Processor	3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS \| q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard	Asrock z77e iTX \| p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling	Custom Water \| D-14 & HR-03gt \| Passive HSF
Memory	Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v \| OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s)	MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 \| Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage	Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ \| WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s)	BenQ gw2750hm \| 46" Sharp Quatron
Case	BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d \| Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s)	Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 \| Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply	Ocz mXp700w \| Ocz zx850w \| Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse	Logitech G700s \| Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard	TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks\| Logitech G11
Software	Win7 Home \| Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate \| Raspbian
Benchmark Scores	Epeen!! Who needs epeen??

System Name	Main Stack
Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Motherboard	Asus X870 ROG Strix-A - White
Cooling	Air (temporary until 9070xt blocks are available)
Memory	G. Skill Royal 2x24GB 6000Mhz C26
Video Card(s)	Powercolor Red Devil Radeon 9070XT 16G
Storage	Samsung 9100 Gen5 1TB \| Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) \| Lexar NM790 2TB (Games_2)
Display(s)	Asus XG27ACDNG 360Hz QD-OLED \| Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS \| LG 24" 1440 IPS 1440p
Case	HAVN HS420 - White
Audio Device(s)	FiiO K7 \| Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply	Corsair RM1000x ATX 3.1
Mouse	Razer Viper v3 Pro
Keyboard	Corsair K65 Plus 75% Wireless - USB Mode
Software	Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit

System Name	ODIN
Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard	Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
Cooling	Dark Rock 4
Memory	G Skill RipjawsV F4 3600 Mhz C16
Video Card(s)	MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ventus 3X OC LHR
Storage	Crucial 2 TB M.2 SSD :: WD Blue M.2 1TB SSD :: 1 TB WD Black VelociRaptor
Display(s)	Dell S2716DG 27" 144 Hz G-SYNC
Case	Fractal Meshify C
Audio Device(s)	Onboard Audio
Power Supply	Antec HCP 850 80+ Gold
Mouse	Corsair M65
Keyboard	Corsair K70 RGB Lux
Software	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores	I don't benchmark.