AMD's Ryzen 7 1700X Glorious Benchmarks Leak; IHS, Pin Layout Photographed

[lexluthermiester]

Good luck at 3000/3200 lol

It's been done.

 

[Manu_PT]

I disagree to a point. Most games now are built with a focus on 4 cores as a minimum and scaling up to 6 cores. So far any more than that has yielded little to no return in most AAA titles; however this also has slowly been changing and will continue to do so with a lot of titles like Ashes of the Signularity and City Skylines pushing for as many threads as you will give them.

Setting that aside, that we can't expect AMD to jump from as far behind as they were to first place in one revision. They seemed to have achieved their 40% IPC target and that put them right around the 4770K and 6900K in single threaded performance. That is damn impressive. I am sure they have Ryzen+ design already in the works for further refinement. Is it the best for gaming? No. Well what if we consider that price thou!

And then I can just put an i7 7700k at 4,8ghz, wich is easy on those chips, and I have 4 cores + 4 logical ones, more than enough for any game for 144hz, while AMD will be slower on games that use only 2 to 4 threads because of lower IPC.

IPC is the most important thing in games, just because Battlefield 1 and GTA V or some really bad Watch Dogs Ubicrap port use threads, doesn´t mean every game do it. Most of them don´t use a lot of threads but they are IPC hungry. That´s why each 200mhz overclock on your chip gives huge increase on FPS.

Close enough tho for AMD, gaming wise. And a win win on multi thread operations (editing/creating/enterprise/professional). As I´m a gamer I will stick to Intel.

 

[HD64G]

Cinebench numbers are great. Especially if MT test is at 3.5GHz getting equal to 6900K for a third of its price and lower power consumption on a less optimised procedure! Epic product from AMD and now it's clear why they turned the Zen name to Ryzen...

 

[NdMk2o1o]

And then I can just put an i7 7700k at 4,8ghz, wich is easy on those chips, and I have 4 cores + 4 logical ones, more than enough for any game for 144hz, while AMD will be slower on games that use only 2 to 4 threads because of lower IPC.

IPC is the most important thing in games, just because Battlefield 1 and GTA V or some really bad Watch Dogs Ubicrap port use threads, doesn´t mean every game do it. Most of them don´t use a lot of threads but they are IPC hungry. That´s why each 200mhz overclock on your chip gives huge increase on FPS.

Close enough tho for AMD, gaming wise. And a win win on multi thread operations (editing/creating/enterprise/professional). As I´m a gamer I will stick to Intel.

Where is AMD's IPC slower than intels on any of the supposed leaked benchmarks? your talking shit and making it up as you go along by my reckoning.... you do realise of all the leaked benchmarks, the Ryzen chips have been run at stock/boost clocks which are a good 400-500mhz slower than intels

 

[Manu_PT]

You should read everything on the source link. Maybe you could avoid being silly.

 

[theeldest]

I get 3347 in Cinebench on my work system. (2133 mem). That 1500 looks pretty good.

 

[psycore]

Meh single core IPC still behind what intel offers and that's what I care about. Multi thread useless for my gaming needs. Nice try tho and massive improvement from bulldozer

 

[theeldest]

IPC is the most important thing in games

Not really. You want IPC * Clock for single threads. If AMD's turbo/XFR works better than Intel's version then the single threaded performance can be better.

So it's very much a 'wait and see'.

 

[psycore]

Nope, Multi thread is what you need actually from now on, witcher 3 gta v watch dogs 2 etc, and let's say older games that interesting me to, needs better single thread performance ok look if you have time many videos in you tube comparison between
5960x vs 6700k.the 6700k has far better single thread performance isn't? in all games i was checked there is absolutely no one game older or new between those cpus 6700k and 5960x and say that the one performs better than the other,not only that and if you carefully look the benchmarks you'll see that the 5960x has better minimum frames and that is the most important in pc gaming.Anyway if you think that the new cpus like R7 1700x will have the same performance like i7 4770k or 4790k then you are completely wrong.In games like gta v witcher 3 watch dogs 2 battlefield1 the R7 1700X will be far far ahead.But let's wait and see real time results.Don't worry these new chips will be great for everything.4 cores will be useless from now on,very soon

 

[psycore]

And then I can just put an i7 7700k at 4,8ghz, wich is easy on those chips, and I have 4 cores + 4 logical ones, more than enough for any game for 144hz, while AMD will be slower on games that use only 2 to 4 threads because of lower IPC.

IPC is the most important thing in games, just because Battlefield 1 and GTA V or some really bad Watch Dogs Ubicrap port use threads, doesn´t mean every game do it. Most of them don´t use a lot of threads but they are IPC hungry. That´s why each 200mhz overclock on your chip gives huge increase on FPS.

Close enough tho for AMD, gaming wise. And a win win on multi thread operations (editing/creating/enterprise/professional). As I´m a gamer I will stick to Intel.

 

[psycore]

Wrong with R7 you will have the same performance in gaming plus far better performance in other works' Let's wait some real time benchmarks in gaming

 

[Hossein Almet]

When I read the review of the RX480, and it said: Power consumption was 40w for Blue Ray playback, I stopped reading...

 

[NdMk2o1o]

Lot of new members talking shit and coming across as butthurt on ALL Ryzen threads, think they anticipate the onslaught that's coming, happy days

 

[xorbe]

When I read the review of the RX480, and it said: Power consumption was 40w for Blue Ray playback, I stopped reading...

wccftech posters have arrived!

 

[HTC]

all aboard!

Very funny xD

 

[chuck216]

There's something I'd like to point out.

Everyone is so intent on comparing these results with Intel CPUs and saying "still not enough IPC"

But has anyone really compared just how much of an improvement the 1700X is over the previous generation FX CPUs

I own an FX-8320 that scores 88 and 564 for single and multi-thread with the cpu locked @3.5 Ghz compared to the 1700X's 154 and 1537 at the same 3.5 Ghz.

That's a 75% and 172.5% improvement over the Vishera (Piledriver) at the same clock speeds.

Even when compared to my overclocked results @4.7 Ghz of 112 and 701 it still is 37.5% and 119.25% faster than an 8320 with a 34% faster clock.

To me that's impressive, especially if the Ryzen X series overclock nearly as well as the FX's do.

 

[alucasa]

Nah, when a CPU design was sooo bad, it's easy to vastly improve it.

 

[Ascalaphus]

Nah, when a CPU design was sooo bad, it's easy to vastly improve it.

Yep.

 

[Thefumigator]

I own an FX-8320 that scores 88 and 564 for single and multi-thread with the cpu locked @3.5 Ghz compared to the 1700X's 154 and 1537 at the same 3.5 Ghz.

That's a 75% and 172.5% improvement over the Vishera (Piledriver) at the same clock speeds.

Nah, when a CPU design was sooo bad, it's easy to vastly improve it.

I also own an FX 8320 and its far from being the disaster everyone think it is.
The problem with the FX line is that is old, and there was no new architecture from AMD in the high end until now.

 

[Xzibit]

And then I can just put an i7 7700k at 4,8ghz, wich is easy on those chips, and I have 4 cores + 4 logical ones, more than enough for any game for 144hz, while AMD will be slower on games that use only 2 to 4 threads because of lower IPC.

IPC is the most important thing in games, just because Battlefield 1 and GTA V or some really bad Watch Dogs Ubicrap port use threads, doesn´t mean every game do it. Most of them don´t use a lot of threads but they are IPC hungry. That´s why each 200mhz overclock on your chip gives huge increase on FPS.

Close enough tho for AMD, gaming wise. And a win win on multi thread operations (editing/creating/enterprise/professional). As I´m a gamer I will stick to Intel.

You still be paying 40% more (rumor price) for a 10% IPC difference (ES test) at most

 

[Manu_PT]

Nope, Multi thread is what you need actually from now on, witcher 3 gta v watch dogs 2 etc, and let's say older games that interesting me to, needs better single thread performance ok look if you have time many videos in you tube comparison between
5960x vs 6700k.the 6700k has far better single thread performance isn't? in all games i was checked there is absolutely no one game older or new between those cpus 6700k and 5960x and say that the one performs better than the other,not only that and if you carefully look the benchmarks you'll see that the 5960x has better minimum frames and that is the most important in pc gaming.Anyway if you think that the new cpus like R7 1700x will have the same performance like i7 4770k or 4790k then you are completely wrong.In games like gta v witcher 3 watch dogs 2 battlefield1 the R7 1700X will be far far ahead.But let's wait and see real time results.Don't worry these new chips will be great for everything.4 cores will be useless from now on,very soon

I´m sorry but all I see in benchmarks is 7700k stinking on any Intel 6-core, like it stinks on Ryzen (if these benchmarks are true).

Don´t forget also the massive Ram speeds you can get with kabylake wich give huge performance boost. Curious to see if AMD can reach 4000mhz on the ram and 4,8ghz on the cpu clock that easy...

 

[cdawall]

Now I'm starting to get excited these are the actual benchmarks I was wanting to see. Here is to hoping it is true and amd pulled something good out.

 

[R0H1T]

wccftech posters have arrived!

I wonder if TPU can autoba(h)n new members who talk shit

 

[R0H1T]

I´m sorry but all I see in benchmarks is 7700k stinking on any Intel 6-core, like it stinks on Ryzen (if these benchmarks are true).

Don´t forget also the massive Ram speeds you can get with kabylake wich give huge performance boost. Curious to see if AMD can reach 4000mhz on the ram and 4,8ghz on the cpu clock that easy...

Oh shut it, you sound like a used car salesman.

 

[alucasa]

I think I will be looking at server part instead. I've been thinking of going dual CPU setup for a while now. Hopefully, AMD gets server parts affordable.