GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Overclocked Beyond 2 GHz Put Through 3DMark

[Captain_Tom]

If AMD can come close in performance and under cut Nvidia like they did to Intel they will sell a shit ton of Vega cards.

Hope we get more concrete leaks on Vega 10 soon.

At this point I am expecting it to trade blows with the 1080 Ti for $600.

 

[XiGMAKiD]

Nice, maybe with Volta we can get to 3GHz?

 

[PowerPC]

Vega is quite a bit far away right now. But if you're not especially in need of a new graphics card right now, I would definitely wait. I think Vega will outclass this pretty easily, even if it's just HDMI 2.1 possibly being on there as a big new feature.

 

[P4-630]

I would definitely wait.

 

[RejZoR]

Well, RX480 did deliver what they promised. Ryzen did deliver what they promised. What makes you think RX Vega won't?

 

[P4-630]

Well, RX480 did deliver what they promised. Ryzen did deliver what they promised. What makes you think RX Vega won't?

It's just the waiting.....
And:

I don't think it'll dominate GTX 1080Ti

 

[peche]

AMD should have never bought ATI......

wise comment my friend, wise comment,

Regards,

 

[RejZoR]

Ryzen doesn't dominate 6900k. But it costs half as much. Hint hint. Besides, dominating it would mean being what, 10-20% faster. If it's as fast as 1080Ti, and costs less, people will buy it en mass.

 

[P4-630]

Who knows, they may charge the consumer a huge premium for that HBM2...

But again....
Waiting............

 

[efikkan]

wait few months HBM2 is coming

No HBM in the world can make the Vega 10 beat GP102.

Well, RX480 did deliver what they promised. Ryzen did deliver what they promised. What makes you think RX Vega won't?

Polaris never delivered on 2.5× energy efficiency, not even close…

 

[RejZoR]

Why are you clinching at power efficiency only? They delivered a cheap and powerful graphic card for the masses. No one cares about power efficiency at that point. You can't call it power hungry either, regardless of it not achieving your 2.5x efficiency...

 

[efikkan]

Why are you clinching at power efficiency only? They delivered a cheap and powerful graphic card for the masses. No one cares about power efficiency at that point. You can't call it power hungry either, regardless of it not achieving your 2.5x efficiency...

Well, it's just marginally more efficient than Fiji, even with a node shrink. Right now GP106 is ~55% more efficient, GP104 ~80% more efficient and GP102 ~85% more efficient than Polaris, so it will be no small feat for AMD to cover that gap.
It's kind of sad when AMD's new generation only covers the lower mid-range and downwards, since their architecture didn't scale.

 

[MxPhenom 216]

Ryzen doesn't dominate 6900k. But it costs half as much. Hint hint. Besides, dominating it would mean being what, 10-20% faster. If it's as fast as 1080Ti, and costs less, people will buy it en mass.

Ryzen also has problems so meh. Until those BIOS updates come to fix SOME of the memory problems, Ryzen isnt interesting to me anymore.

 

[Captain_Tom]

No HBM in the world can make the Vega 10 beat GP102

So just zero chance?

Even though it will have 10%+ more TFLOPS and 5% more bandwidth than GP102?

Keep in mind that Polaris closed most of the TFLOPS/performance gap that used to exist, and Vega is improving on that even more.

 

[Captain_Tom]

wise comment my friend, wise comment,

Regards,

The history books still aren't done being written on that acquisition. Let's see in 5 years what everyone thinks.

 

[efikkan]

So just zero chance?

Even though it will have 10%+ more TFLOPS and 5% more bandwidth than GP102?

Keep in mind that Polaris closed most of the TFLOPS/performance gap that used to exist, and Vega is improving on that even more.

When did people learn how to do math?
RX 480 (5161 GFlop/s) is beaten by the GTX 1060 (3855 GFlop/s), even though RX 480 has 34% more computational power.

 

[erixx]

I just say, and it makes me somehow sad because I want to be open to Vega and whatnot: I recently have build a lower specs PC with a Ati-Amd 470 and look... first time in many years or even a decade that I have grafix problems (a microsecond flickering screen in Windows 10 and in "Steep" game). Maybe it is not the gpu... I still have to check. Something I never had to do with nV, if the specs were low, game was slow, but "oddities"? Never!.

 

[kruk]

When did people learn how to do math?
RX 480 (5161 GFlop/s) is beaten by the GTX 1060 (3855 GFlop/s), even though RX 480 has 34% more computational power.

It's hard to do math with too many unknown variables present. We don't know what Vega architecture changes will bring and thus any comparisons with previous gen cards cannot be made ...

 

[sweet]

When did people learn how to do math?
RX 480 (5161 GFlop/s) is beaten by the GTX 1060 (3855 GFlop/s), even though RX 480 has 34% more computational power.

GTX 1060 was faster than RX 480 when released but now you can see RX 480 caught up and pulled ahead.

If AMD can pull a Fury die sink which is able to clock at 1500 MHz, and of coz add more fking ROPs, they can match 1080Ti for real.

 

[mark84]

here is my TItan X Pascal overclocked.

http://hwbot.org/submission/3478669_nicklas0912_3dmark___time_spy_titan_x_pascal_10984_marks

Almost same clocks, so clock for clock Titan X Pascal bring out a little more fps.
Look GPU score, he use 6950x, I use 6900K.

Yeah my Titan X can basically match core clocks too. Fluctuates between 1950MHz and 2060MHz. Memory was 5760MHz.
My 6850K was only clocked at 4.1Ghz. Just daily OC.
7678 in Firestrike Ultra http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11892277
9832 in Time Spy http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1317096

1080Ti = Titan X

Annoying for Titan X owners who shelled out far more for effectively the same product.
I was quite surprised with the Ti announcement, the first Ti to not have shaders culled from the halo product.

 

[thesmokingman]

Sweet! So pretty much about the same as my dual 980tis @ 1400mhz.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/7313421

the 1080 ti is only about 1000 points off.
Impressive.
Definitely sealed my purchase.

You coulda had this speed almost a year ago.

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/7313421/fs/11138351

 

[Ascalaphus]

You coulda had this speed almost a year ago.

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/7313421/fs/11138351

Yeah but then I would have had to shell out $1200 for one card.

 

[Prima.Vera]

Still cool, I may still swap mine out just because of how cheaper it is.

Cheaper?? You're joking right? Or you grow money on the trees?

 

[Captain_Tom]

When did people learn how to do math?
RX 480 (5161 GFlop/s) is beaten by the GTX 1060 (3855 GFlop/s), even though RX 480 has 34% more computational power.

Wow you just flat out can't read. Compare what it used to be to now. I said the 480 closed most of the gap, and Vega adds substantial Architectural enhancements. In fact the difference between Vega and Polaris seems to be FAR larger than that between Fiji and Polaris.


Let's see how this pans out

 

[Captain_Tom]

It's hard to do math with too many unknown variables present. We don't know what Vega architecture changes will bring and thus any comparisons with previous gen cards cannot be made ...

What we do know is that Vega 10 is over double the stats of the 480 ACROSS THE BOARD (Which would put it on par with the 1080 TI / Titan X with just that). Then add:

-2x the Geometry IPC
-Half as much VRAM needed as before (Which could mean more effective bandwidth)
-Better memory compression
-Many more things like vastly lower latency, re-organized ROP's, etc.

Only a drooling idiot would think Vega wouldn't be at least twice as strong as the 480.


But let's be clear: I don't have a crystal ball, and I am not saying Vega will 100% beat Pascal. But if Vega 10 can't at least MATCH the 1080 Ti, it will be a Bulldozer-level failure in my opinion.