GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Overclocked Beyond 2 GHz Put Through 3DMark

Caring1 · Mar 7, 2017

sweet said:
GTX 1060 was faster than RX 480 when released but now you can see RX 480 caught up and pulled ahead.

Maybe in gaming, but in benchmarks the 1060 is still ahead.
These are similar platforms showing Ryzen CPU's and the two GPU's mentioned, if you look at the graphics score it shows the 1060 ahead despite being paired with the slower CPU.
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1325916?_ga=1.266540942.181503479.1487944691
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1325911?_ga=1.207237779.181503479.1487944691

GreiverBlade · Mar 7, 2017

overclocked or boosted? because it's like the previous batch ...

User A: "my card OC @ 2025mhz UUU!1!1!!!"
User B: " wow my card does not even goes up past 1706mhz"
User C: ".... i think User A is talking about boost ..."
User B: "oh .. well if so ... mine in boost goes up to 2100mhz..."

:rolleyes:

edit: yep after a second look at the pics : max boost frequency 2062mhz .... meaning a OC clock of 1531mhz (well if it does 2062 for 1531 that's a better boosting ratio than my 2100/2088 for 1706, although i keep my card at 1557 since it's not really underperforming for now)

BOOOORING

Caring1 said:
Maybe in gaming, but in benchmarks the 1060 is still ahead.

errrr @Caring1 as much as i like you and your post ... i have to write : if the card perform better in gaming but slightly worse in benchmarks ... then it's the "winner" ... benchmark serve nothing but self contentment (well gaming too ... but you don't interact with a benchmark ...)

for me (non game) Benchmark is worth horse sh!t when it come to decide which card is better.

Prima.Vera · Mar 7, 2017

GreiverBlade said:
...for me 3dmark is worth horse sh!t when it come to decide which card is better.

Contrary to others opinions, 3DMark's benchmarks engines are very well coded to use up to 16 threads of CPU, and to fully utilize all GPU capacity despite of brand. That's why those software are used by 90% of the reviewers out there.
The game engines however...hmm. Most of them are unoptimised to fully use all resources of the CPU/GPU, but specially they are optimized by the way the wind blows. Or the cash flow from you know who...

GreiverBlade · Mar 7, 2017

Prima.Vera said:
Contrary to others opinions, 3DMark's benchmarks engines are very well coded to use up to 16 threads of CPU, and to fully utilize all GPU capacity despite of brand. That's why those software are used by 90% of the reviewers out there.
The game engines however...hmm. Most of them are unoptimised to fully use all resources of the CPU/GPU, but specially they are optimized by the way the wind blows. Or the cash flow from you know who...

yep but, nope ... bench is not indicative of "real use situation"

ah TPU GPU reviews use benchies for reviews? i always saw games

(and heaven 4.0 sometime ... since heaven is a GPU hog ... well that one is a tad better.... for GPU reviews)

thought if the card A perform better in gaming than card B and worse in bench: Card A is the best one of the 2 ... (not literally speaking, if you focus on breaking benchmark score ... well yep you take Card B ... or a Titan XP/1080Ti ... )

let me re edit my post ... i should generalize

Caring1 · Mar 7, 2017

GreiverBlade said:
if the card perform better in gaming but slightly worse in benchmarks ... then it's the "winner" ... benchmark serve nothing but self contentment (well gaming too ... but you don't interact with a benchmark ...)

for me (non game) Benchmark is worth horse sh!t when it come to decide which card is better.

I agree, but reviewers and tech sites tend to cite figures from benches, not real world usage.
IMO it depends on the game played which is better between the 1060 and 480.

bug · Mar 7, 2017

GreiverBlade said:
yep but, nope ... bench is not indicative of "real use situation"

As @Prima.Vera said, a benchmark like 3DMark will show what a card can do. Whether or not a game engine uses a card to its fullest, is a different discussion. In the end, yes, it all comes down to how the few titles one plays work on a given card. But dismissing synthetic benchmarks altogether isn't a good idea.

PowerPC · Mar 7, 2017

P4-630 said:

That's a bit overboard, don't you think? If it was half a year, I would tend to agree. But it's looking more like 2-3 months until a potentially groundbreaking card from AMD (again, we don't know, but RX480 didn't disappoint). I don't get how 2-3 months isn't worth the wait right now.

peche · Mar 7, 2017

Captain_Tom said:
But let's be clear: I don't have a crystal ball, and I am not saying Vega will 100% beat Pascal. But if Vega 10 can't at least MATCH the 1080 Ti, it will be a Bulldozer-level failure in my opinion.

+1 here...
Despite all said, there is another thing to thank, this war helped us to get a better price tag on several things....

GhostRyder · Mar 7, 2017

Prima.Vera said:
Cheaper?? You're joking right? Or you grow money on the trees?

I meant as I could sell my Titan XP for still above 1k (Heck I still see them sell for around 1200) and then buy a GTX 1080ti and end up getting back some money for similar/more performance in games.

GreiverBlade said:
overclocked or boosted? because it's like the previous batch ...

User A: "my card OC @ 2025mhz UUU!1!1!!!"
User B: " wow my card does not even goes up past 1706mhz"
User C: ".... i think User A is talking about boost ..."
User B: "oh .. well if so ... mine in boost goes up to 2100mhz..."

edit: yep after a second look at the pics : max boost frequency 2062mhz .... meaning a OC clock of 1531mhz (well if it does 2062 for 1531 that's a better boosting ratio than my 2100/2088 for 1706, although i keep my card at 1557 since it's not really underperforming for now)

BOOOORING

errrr @Caring1 as much as i like you and your post ... i have to write : if the card perform better in gaming but slightly worse in benchmarks ... then it's the "winner" ... benchmark serve nothing but self contentment (well gaming too ... but you don't interact with a benchmark ...)

for me (non game) Benchmark is worth horse sh!t when it come to decide which card is better.

Yea, it may not go as much further as originally thought. Or it may just be able to hold that area of boost better.

efikkan · Mar 7, 2017

sweet said:
GTX 1060 was faster than RX 480 when released but now you can see RX 480 caught up and pulled ahead.

No, RX 480 is only better in AMD optimized games.

sweet said:
If AMD can pull a Fury die sink which is able to clock at 1500 MHz, and of coz add more fking ROPs, they can match 1080Ti for real.

Nope. Fiji couldn't match GM200 because AMD couldn't keep their 4096 cores saturated. If ROPs were the problem you would have seen a clear correlation with higher resolutions.

Captain_Tom said:
Wow you just flat out can't read. Compare what it used to be to now. I said the 480 closed most of the gap, and Vega adds substantial Architectural enhancements. In fact the difference between Vega and Polaris seems to be FAR larger than that between Fiji and Polaris.

Let's see how this pans out

I can read, but you either can't remember or understand your own words:

Keep in mind that Polaris closed most of the TFLOPS/performance gap that used to exist

Regardless of how you want to interpret this, Polaris did little to close the gap as you claimed.
I've already provided you with the Performance/FLOPs for the GPUs:

RX 480 (5161 GFlop/s) is beaten by the GTX 1060 (3855 GFlop/s), even though RX 480 has 34% more computational power

You can't seriously claim that Polaris "closed most of the […] gap", that's insane.

And in terms of performance/watt it's even worse. GP104 is ~80% and GP102 ~85% more efficient than Polaris, which is a larger gap than with Maxwell. I'm pointing this out because AMD needs to solve all these problems before they can become competitive. It would be an achievement of the century to be able to do it in a single year! So please stop terrorizing everyone that's bursting your AMD bubble by pointing out the facts and realistic estimates for AMD products!

deemon · Mar 8, 2017

PowerPC said:
That's a bit overboard, don't you think? If it was half a year, I would tend to agree. But it's looking more like 2-3 months until a potentially groundbreaking card from AMD (again, we don't know, but RX480 didn't disappoint). I don't get how 2-3 months isn't worth the wait right now.

2-3 months left of the 4 years wait. I myself gave up on it year ago and went with 1070 ... hopefully AMD delivers for next GPU refresh

P4-630 · Mar 8, 2017

deemon said:
I myself gave up on it year ago and went with 1070

Great card! No regrets!
:toast:

mroofie · Mar 8, 2017

P4-630 said:

rtwjunkie · Mar 8, 2017

Basard said:
AMD should have never bought ATI......

That has been the only thing keeping them afloat financially. Without ATI, they'd have gone under. Also, being diversified, unlike Intel and NVIDIA is an advantage long-term, I believe.

bug · Mar 8, 2017

rtwjunkie said:
That has been the only thing keeping them afloat financially. Without ATI, they'd have gone under. Also, being diversified, unlike Intel and NVIDIA is an advantage long-term, I believe.

Hehe. as far as "diversified" is concerned, it's AMD that's trailing. Nvidia has SoCs and through them a foothold in car infotainment systems. And intel is in so many markets, I don't know where to begin.

Captain_Tom · Mar 10, 2017

peche said:
+1 here...
Despite all said, there is another thing to thank, this war helped us to get a better price tag on several things....

Honestly for me it's not just about price this time: I really do want AMD to raise the performance bar substantially.

What I don't get is why so many people are impress by the performance of the Titan/1080 Ti. I mean it's bloody 2017 and we are supposed to be impressed with BARELY acceptable 4K performance for $700?! I got a Fury @ 1135/525 a year ago for $310, and the FAR newer 1080 Ti is only ~70% stronger for 225% the money. Wake me up when we have ANY card that can do some 4K at 100Hz+ gaming...

Fluffmeister · Mar 10, 2017

Sleep tight then sweet prince.

GreiverBlade · Mar 10, 2017

i just realized that my 1070 factory OC (untouched) boost to 1923 from 1557 ... oh well only 139mhz lower in boost ...

bug · Mar 10, 2017

Captain_Tom said:
Honestly for me it's not just about price this time: I really do want AMD to raise the performance bar substantially.

What I don't get is why so many people are impress by the performance of the Titan/1080 Ti.

I don't think anyone is impressed by performance alone. It's the efficiency that got to incredible levels with Pascal (i.e. what you can squeeze out of 250W). But you can't talk about efficiency to an AMD fan, because, well...

At the same time, yes, I also await the day when a mid range card will push 4k, that will be quite an achievement. But that day will not be in 2017 or in 2018. Hopefully in 2019.

Captain_Tom · Mar 10, 2017

bug said:
I don't think anyone is impressed by performance alone. It's the efficiency that got to incredible levels with Pascal (i.e. what you can squeeze out of 250W). But you can't talk about efficiency to an AMD fan, because, well...

Hmm? Not sure why. After all it wasn't until Pascal that Nvidia was more efficient. That is unless you count the 580 as efficient, and you ignore that the R9 Nano existed.

Efficiency, like price - is a design choice. Anyone can do it.

Prima.Vera · Mar 12, 2017

rtwjunkie said:
That has been the only thing keeping them afloat financially. Without ATI, they'd have gone under...

Some bad mouths are or were claiming the opposite, haha...

bug · Mar 12, 2017

Prima.Vera said:
Some bad mouths are or were claiming the opposite, haha...

Well, it's not exactly the case here, but that is the reason conglomerates exist: when one part of the business stalls, if falls back on the parts that don't.

Vayra86 · Mar 14, 2017

Captain_Tom said:
Honestly for me it's not just about price this time: I really do want AMD to raise the performance bar substantially.

What I don't get is why so many people are impress by the performance of the Titan/1080 Ti. I mean it's bloody 2017 and we are supposed to be impressed with BARELY acceptable 4K performance for $700?! I got a Fury @ 1135/525 a year ago for $310, and the FAR newer 1080 Ti is only ~70% stronger for 225% the money. Wake me up when we have ANY card that can do some 4K at 100Hz+ gaming...

Why people are impressed? Because they know that 4K is still in its early stages, and because the 1080ti keeps following the natural trend of +-30% perf increase to the previous gen card, and usually even more than that (in fact Pascal breaks the trend by another 5-10% extra perf compared to Fermi > Kepler > Maxwell) but not only that; it does so with a much better perf/watt, low temps, and good OC capability. Because people can push the most powerful SKU and with decent cooling can stick below 70 C easy, whereas the previous gen would constantly be bumping into BIOS temp limits of 80 C+.

The fact is, you are sugar coating what hasn't come to market yet (Vega), because '1080ti' cant even do 4k/ultra/60 fps. The logic is lost here. Vega will NOT be able to push that setting either, I'll provide you that bit of realism right now.

Also, you are STILL double posting.

System Name	H7 Flow 2024
Processor	AMD 5800X3D
Motherboard	Asus X570 Tough Gaming
Cooling	Custom liquid
Memory	32 GB DDR4
Video Card(s)	Intel ARC A750
Storage	Crucial P5 Plus 2TB.
Display(s)	AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Mouse	Lenovo
Keyboard	Eweadn Mechanical
Software	W11 Pro 64 bit

System Name	main/SFFHTPCARGH!(tm)/Xiaomi Mi TV Stick/Samsung Galaxy S23/Ally
Processor	Ryzen 7 5800X3D/i7-3770/S905X/Snapdragon 8 Gen 2/Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Motherboard	MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk/HP SFF Q77 Express/uh?/uh?/Asus
Cooling	Enermax ETS-T50 Axe aRGB /basic HP HSF /errr.../oh! liqui..wait, no:sizable vapor chamber/a nice one
Memory	64gb DDR4 3600/8gb DDR3 1600/2gbLPDDR3/8gbLPDDR5x/16gb(10 sys)LPDDR5 6400
Video Card(s)	Hellhound Spectral White RX 7900 XTX 24gb/GT 730/Mali 450MP5/Adreno 740/Radeon 780M 6gb LPDDR5
Storage	250gb870EVO/500gb860EVO/2tbSandisk/NVMe2tb+1tb/4tbextreme V2/1TB Arion/500gb/8gb/256gb/4tb SN850X
Display(s)	X58222 32" 2880x1620/32"FHDTV/273E3LHSB 27" 1920x1080/6.67"/AMOLED 2X panel FHD+120hz/7" FHD 120hz
Case	Cougar Panzer Max/Elite 8300 SFF/None/back/back-front Gorilla Glass Victus 2+ UAG Monarch Carbon
Audio Device(s)	Logi Z333/SB Audigy RX/HDMI/HDMI/Dolby Atmos/KZ x HBB PR2/Moondrop Chu II + TRN BT20S
Power Supply	Chieftec Proton BDF-1000C /HP 240w/12v 1.5A/4Smart Voltplug PD 30W/Asus USB-C 65W
Mouse	Speedlink Sovos Vertical-Asus ROG Spatha-Logi Ergo M575/Xiaomi XMRM-006/touch/touch
Keyboard	Endorfy Thock 75% <3/none/touch/virtual
VR HMD	Medion Erazer
Software	Win10 64/Win8.1 64/Android TV 8.1/Android 13/Win11 64
Benchmark Scores	bench...mark? i do leave mark on bench sometime, to remember which one is the most comfortable. :o

Processor	Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling	Noctua NH-D15
Memory	32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s)	ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage	2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s)	Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case	NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s)	Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply	Corsair 850W
Mouse	Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software	Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores	30FPS in NFS:Rivals

System Name	main/SFFHTPCARGH!(tm)/Xiaomi Mi TV Stick/Samsung Galaxy S23/Ally
Processor	Ryzen 7 5800X3D/i7-3770/S905X/Snapdragon 8 Gen 2/Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Motherboard	MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk/HP SFF Q77 Express/uh?/uh?/Asus
Cooling	Enermax ETS-T50 Axe aRGB /basic HP HSF /errr.../oh! liqui..wait, no:sizable vapor chamber/a nice one
Memory	64gb DDR4 3600/8gb DDR3 1600/2gbLPDDR3/8gbLPDDR5x/16gb(10 sys)LPDDR5 6400
Video Card(s)	Hellhound Spectral White RX 7900 XTX 24gb/GT 730/Mali 450MP5/Adreno 740/Radeon 780M 6gb LPDDR5
Storage	250gb870EVO/500gb860EVO/2tbSandisk/NVMe2tb+1tb/4tbextreme V2/1TB Arion/500gb/8gb/256gb/4tb SN850X
Display(s)	X58222 32" 2880x1620/32"FHDTV/273E3LHSB 27" 1920x1080/6.67"/AMOLED 2X panel FHD+120hz/7" FHD 120hz
Case	Cougar Panzer Max/Elite 8300 SFF/None/back/back-front Gorilla Glass Victus 2+ UAG Monarch Carbon
Audio Device(s)	Logi Z333/SB Audigy RX/HDMI/HDMI/Dolby Atmos/KZ x HBB PR2/Moondrop Chu II + TRN BT20S
Power Supply	Chieftec Proton BDF-1000C /HP 240w/12v 1.5A/4Smart Voltplug PD 30W/Asus USB-C 65W
Mouse	Speedlink Sovos Vertical-Asus ROG Spatha-Logi Ergo M575/Xiaomi XMRM-006/touch/touch
Keyboard	Endorfy Thock 75% <3/none/touch/virtual
VR HMD	Medion Erazer
Software	Win10 64/Win8.1 64/Android TV 8.1/Android 13/Win11 64
Benchmark Scores	bench...mark? i do leave mark on bench sometime, to remember which one is the most comfortable. :o

System Name	H7 Flow 2024
Processor	AMD 5800X3D
Motherboard	Asus X570 Tough Gaming
Cooling	Custom liquid
Memory	32 GB DDR4
Video Card(s)	Intel ARC A750
Storage	Crucial P5 Plus 2TB.
Display(s)	AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Mouse	Lenovo
Keyboard	Eweadn Mechanical
Software	W11 Pro 64 bit

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Overclocked Beyond 2 GHz Put Through 3DMark

Caring1

GreiverBlade

Prima.Vera

GreiverBlade

Caring1

bug

PowerPC

peche

Thermaltake fanboy

GhostRyder

efikkan

deemon

P4-630

mroofie

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast

bug

Captain_Tom

Fluffmeister

GreiverBlade

bug

Captain_Tom

Prima.Vera

bug

Vayra86

Processor	Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard	Asus H670 TUF
Cooling	Arctic Freezer 34
Memory	2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s)	EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage	500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s)	Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case	Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s)	Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply	Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse	Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard	G.Skill KM780R
Software	Arch Linux + Win10

System Name	Athenna
Processor	intel i7 3770 Dellided
Motherboard	GIGABYTE GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 Rev. 1.1
Cooling	Thermaltake Water 3.0 Pro + Tt Riing12 x2 / Tt ThunderBlade / Gelid Slim 120UV fans
Memory	16GB DRR3 Kingoston with Custom Tt spreaders + HyperX Fan
Video Card(s)	GeForce GTX 980 4GB Nvidia Sample
Storage	Crucial M4 SSD 64GB's / Seagate Barracuda 2TB / Seagate Barracuda 320GB's
Display(s)	22" LG FLATRON 1920 x 1280p
Case	Thermaltake Commander G42 Window
Audio Device(s)	On-board Dolby 5.1+ Kingston HyperX Cloud 1
Power Supply	Themaltake TR2 700W 80plus bronce & APC Pro backup 1000Va
Mouse	Tt eSports Level 10M Rev 1.0 Diamond Black & Tt Conkor "L" mouse pad
Keyboard	Tt eSports KNUCKER
Software	windows 10x64Pro
Benchmark Scores	well I've fried a 775' P4 12 years ago, that counts?

System Name	SnowFire / The Reinforcer
Processor	i7 10700K 5.1ghz (24/7) / 2x Xeon E52650v2
Motherboard	Asus Strix Z490 / Dell Dual Socket (R720)
Cooling	RX 360mm + 140mm Custom Loop / Dell Stock
Memory	Corsair RGB 16gb DDR4 3000 CL 16 / DDR3 128gb 16 x 8gb
Video Card(s)	GTX Titan XP (2025mhz) / Asus GTX 950 (No Power Connector)
Storage	Samsung 970 1tb NVME and 2tb HDD x4 RAID 5 / 300gb x8 RAID 5
Display(s)	Acer XG270HU, Samsung G7 Odyssey (1440p 240hz)
Case	Thermaltake Cube / Dell Poweredge R720 Rack Mount Case
Audio Device(s)	Realtec ALC1150 (On board)
Power Supply	Rosewill Lightning 1300Watt / Dell Stock 750 / Brick
Mouse	Logitech G5
Keyboard	Logitech G19S
Software	Windows 11 Pro / Windows Server 2016

Processor	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X \|\|\| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard	ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR \|\|\| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling	Noctua NH-U14S \|\|\| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory	Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz \|\|\| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s)	MSI GTX 1060 3GB \|\|\| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage	Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB \|\|\| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s)	Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" \|\|\| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case	Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s)	Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply	Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse	Razer Abyssus
Keyboard	CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software	Ubuntu

System Name	Zen
Processor	Ryzen 5950X
Motherboard	MSI
Cooling	Noctua
Memory	G.Skill 32G
Video Card(s)	RX 7900 XTX
Storage	never enough
Display(s)	not OLED :-(
Keyboard	Wooting One
Software	Linux

System Name	AlderLake
Processor	Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling	Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory	32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s)	MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage	Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s)	23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case	Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s)	Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply	Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse	Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard	RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software	Windows 11
Benchmark Scores	Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock

System Name	Mroofie / Mroofie
Processor	Inte Cpu i5 4460 3.2GHZ Turbo Boost 3.4
Motherboard	Gigabyte B85M-HD3
Cooling	Stock Cooling
Memory	Apacer DDR3 1333mhz (4GB) / Adata DDR3 1600Mhz(8GB) CL11
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte Gtx 960 WF
Storage	Seagate 1TB / Seagate 80GB / Seagate 1TB (another one)
Display(s)	Philips LED 24 Inch 1080p 60Hz
Case	Zalman T4
Audio Device(s)	Meh
Power Supply	Antec Truepower Classic 750W 80 Plus Gold
Mouse	Meh
Keyboard	Meh
VR HMD	Meh
Software	Windows 10
Benchmark Scores	Meh

Processor	Core i9-9900k
Motherboard	ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling	All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax ETS-T50 Black CPU cooler
Memory	32GB (2x16) Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s)	ASUS RTX 4070 Ti Super OC 16GB
Storage	1x 1TB MX500 (OS); 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 2TB MX500; 1x 1TB BX500 SSD; 1x 6TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s)	Infievo 27" 165Hz @ 2560 x 1440
Case	Fractal Design Define R4 Black -windowed
Audio Device(s)	Soundblaster Z
Power Supply	Seasonic Focus GX-1000 Gold
Mouse	Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard	Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)

Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard	MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Cooling	AMD Wraith Prism
Memory	Team Group Dark Pro 8Pack Edition 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s)	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 FE
Storage	Kingston A2000 1TB + Seagate HDD workhorse
Display(s)	Samsung 50" QN94A Neo QLED
Case	Antec 1200
Power Supply	Seasonic Focus GX-850
Mouse	Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard	Logitech UltraX
Software	Windows 11

Processor	7800X3D
Motherboard	MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling	Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory	32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s)	ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage	Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s)	Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case	Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s)	Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply	EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse	Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard	Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software	W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores	Over 9000