- Joined
- Feb 11, 2009
- Messages
- 5,892 (0.98/day)
| System Name | Cyberline |
|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k |
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4 |
| Cooling | Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop |
| Memory | Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz |
| Video Card(s) | AMD RX480 -> RX7800XT |
| Storage | Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD |
| Display(s) | Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF |
| Case | antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case |
| Audio Device(s) | Focusrite 2i4 (USB) |
| Power Supply | Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum |
| Mouse | Elecom EX-G |
| Keyboard | Rapoo V700 |
| Software | Windows 10 Pro 64bit |
Well yeah, I guess it might be a devolution of the meaning/impact of words.
Louis CK made a joke about it once how we call everything "awesome" and "best in the world".
"So we got a burger from MCdonalds and describe it with those words and then what do you say when your baby is born?"
Im not saying AMD does not have to perform here, but "better than" is "better than".
If a Vega card has the same performance as an Nvidia card but at 90% of the price, then its better, but do we go as far as to describe 10% off as "stellar" and/or "awesome" and/or "wiping the floor with the competition" ?
Because personally I wouldn't, but OP seems to require nothing less than anything fitting those descriptions to make it worth a purchase, just better is not enough, it has to smash the competition otherwise again, go green.
But maybe theirs and my definition of "awesome/stellar/wiping the floor with" is different.