- Joined
- Jan 16, 2008
- Messages
- 1,349 (0.22/day)
- Location
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Processor | i7-3770K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Biostar Hi-Fi Z77 |
Cooling | Swiftech H20 (w/Custom External Rad Enclosure) |
Memory | 16GB DDR3-2400Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Alienware GTX 1070 |
Storage | 1TB Samsung 850 EVO |
Display(s) | 32" LG 1440p |
Case | Cooler Master 690 (w/Mods) |
Audio Device(s) | Creative X-Fi Titanium |
Power Supply | Corsair 750-TX |
Mouse | Logitech G5 |
Keyboard | G. Skill Mechanical |
Software | Windows 10 (X64) |
I'll admit it's mostly assumption based on the fact that the highest end supercomputer in our lineup, the Titan, has not seen an upgrade since 2012.
After doing some Googling on the subject, I've found a lot of "Obama wants to increase supercomputer funding" and plenty of "Trump, Republicans, and The Heritage foundation want cuts to The Department of Energy and science.". Feel free to Google it yourself and see what you come up with.
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme...er-to-build-first-ever-exascale-supercomputer
https://www.top500.org/news/trump-administration-preps-plan-for-huge-cuts-to-department-of-energy/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...eing-department-energy-for-spending-cuts.html
Overall it looks like The Department Of Energy spending has remained about average, adjusted for inflation, since the 1960's, with a 5+% drop in the budget this year.
Too bad we can't use some of that $825 BILLION Dollars a year, that we spend on the military, for supercomputing.