- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Messages
- 13,792 (1.85/day)
System Name | Dark Monolith |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
Motherboard | ASUS Strix X570-E |
Cooling | Arctic Cooling Freezer II 240mm + 2x SilentWings 3 120mm |
Memory | 64 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V Black |
Video Card(s) | XFX Radeon RX 9070 XT Mercury OC Magnetic Air |
Storage | Seagate Firecuda 530 4 TB SSD + Samsung 850 Pro 2 TB SSD + Seagate Barracuda 8 TB HDD |
Display(s) | ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM 240Hz OLED |
Case | Silverstone Kublai KL-07 |
Audio Device(s) | Sound Blaster AE-9 MUSES Edition + Altec Lansing MX5021 2.1 Nichicon Gold |
Power Supply | BeQuiet DarkPower 11 Pro 750W |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Core |
Keyboard | UVI Pride MechaOptical |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
I agree. It's also sad that now AMD has very competitive products, lets face it, Ryzen CPU's are amazing, they still aren't making good enough traction because of initial quite honestly, flawed reviews and shit taken by the Intel fanboys who still swear to vastly inferior but highly clocked quad cores (like 7700K) just because they posted better scores in games that were essentially specifically written for them. But there is no freaking way in this world that 500-900MHz higher clock can offset a lack of 4 physical cores (and 8 freaking threads!). That's like missing a whole quad core CPU! Ryzen has a tiny clock penalty with single threaded or lower threaded apps and games, but even as things stand now, Ryzen is not far behind. And if you buy CPU for long term and lets face it, we usually do, Ryzen will fare far better for far longer with more moderately clocked octa core than Intel will with higher clocked quad core. Games are already going past 4 cores in usage and it'll just get even worse as time goes on.