- Joined
- Jul 9, 2015
- Messages
- 3,413 (1.02/day)
System Name | M3401 notebook |
---|---|
Processor | 5600H |
Motherboard | NA |
Memory | 16GB |
Video Card(s) | 3050 |
Storage | 500GB SSD |
Display(s) | 14" OLED screen of the laptop |
Software | Windows 10 |
Benchmark Scores | 3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling. |
So, it's safe to conclude: Vega is a flop. (580/570 on the opposite, are quite good)
I blame lack of financial resources on R&D and Raja (just because he was hyped for no good reason).
Hopefully Ryzen will be successful enough, as GPU buyers seem to have less clue about the fruck they are buying.
Or right hand being too optimistic.
I still remember how Raja said that there are only 2 GPU companies "because it is so hard to write drivers". jeez.
I blame lack of financial resources on R&D and Raja (just because he was hyped for no good reason).
Hopefully Ryzen will be successful enough, as GPU buyers seem to have less clue about the fruck they are buying.
Given its TDP, it is already pushing limits at 1630Mhz. (and what a laughable bump over FE)At this point im just thinking is this the best VEGA they have?
Oh, please...a year old gpu.
What about 1.5 times difference in die size? (not that core frequency difference had any meaning across 2 different architectures even if chip size was the same)considering a 300MHz difference in core..
Not having to pay hefty premium (up to $200) for adaptive sync.There's nothing else really redeemable about this product.
Left hand not knowing what right hand is... erm... doing.Why would AMD be mocking Volta back in January if they knew they aren't even reaching GTX 1080 performance which was already out at that time?
Or right hand being too optimistic.
I still remember how Raja said that there are only 2 GPU companies "because it is so hard to write drivers". jeez.