- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
- Messages
- 854 (0.30/day)
- Location
- Italy
Processor | i7 2600K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V PRO/Gen 3 |
Cooling | ZeroTherm FZ120 |
Memory | G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR3 |
Video Card(s) | MSI GTX 1060 6G Gaming X |
Storage | Samsung 830 Pro 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB |
Display(s) | Samsung PX2370 + Acer AL1717 |
Case | Antec 1200 v1 |
Audio Device(s) | aune x1s |
Power Supply | Enermax Modu87+ 800W |
Mouse | Logitech G403 |
Keyboard | Qpad MK80 |
In the end it was a fine card, very competitive, i still think 1060 is better, but it was super competitive no doubt, and was pretty good, polaris refresh wasn't that good for example.We are seeing some areas that it wasn't the absolute best in. Memory controller performance being one. What is funny to me is AMD released a "flagship" card and it quite honestly looks to have the same issues. What is strange to me is it doesn't have the compute performance to pull out of the slump this time. I really question what goes through their heads sometimes. I was pretty excited for these cards. Thanks AMD.
Vega 64 has more support for DirectX12 features, hence it has some positives over GTX 1080.
That is probably the only one, since it came out a year and 3 months later, it's pretty reasonable if it has better support for DX12, but seen how badly the latter is implemented even in the latest games, i wouldn't see this as a big advantage at the moment, surely will age better, after all AMD cards do usually age better, but it's also because it's 15 months newer.