• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i7-8700K and i5-8400 SANDRA Benchmarks Surface

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,233 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Ahead of their launch later this quarter, SiSoft SANDRA benchmarks of Intel 8th generation Core i7-8700K and Core i5-8400 six-core processors surfaced in benchmark databases, which were promptly compared to their predecessors by HotHardware. The results put to the test Intel's claims of "over 40 percent more performance" compared to the 7th generation Core processors, which the company made in its 8th Generation Core Launch Event presentation. A bulk of these performance increases are attributed to the increasing core-count over generation, which directly yields higher multi-threaded performance; while a small but significant portion of it is attributed to increases in single-threaded performance. Since the "Coffee Lake" micro-architecture is essentially a refresh of the "Skylake" architecture, single-threaded performance increases could be attributed to higher clock speeds.

The Core i7-8700K is the top-dog of the 8th generation Core mainstream-desktop processor family. This six-core chip was compared to the product it succeeds in Intel's MSDT product-stack, the quad-core Core i7-7700K. There is a 45 percent increase in performance, in the "processor arithmetic" test; and a 47 percent increase in the "processor multimedia" test. These two test-suites are multi-threaded, and hence benefit from the two added cores, which in turn add four additional logical CPUs, thanks to HyperThreading. "Processor cryptography" sees a 12 percent increase. The single-precision and double-precision "Scientific Analysis" tests, which again are multi-threaded, see 26 percent and 32 percent performance gains over the i7-7700K, respectively.



The next processor on the chopping block is the Core i5-8400. This chip is of particular significance because it is expected to give you six cores around the $200-mark, and logically succeeds the Core i5-7400, and yet it was compared to the i5-7600K (which is succeeded by the i5-8600K). Despite that, we see a healthy 40 percent increase in "processor arithmetic" performance, a staggering 50 percent increase in "processor multimedia" performance, a 14 percent increase in "processor cryptography," and 30 percent and 17 percent increases in single- and double-precision "scientific analysis" results, respectively. It looks like the generational update could entice Core i5 owners more than Core i7 owners. For someone with, say, a Core i5-4670, the upgrade to an 8th generation Core i5 could bring tangible performance gains. The results also show i7-8700K to be a formidable opponent to the Ryzen 7-1800X.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,897 (0.81/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name Boomer Master Race
Processor Intel Core i5 12600H
Motherboard MinisForum NAB6 Lite Board
Cooling Mini PC Cooling
Memory Apacer 16GB 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Storage Kingston 512GB SSD
Display(s) Sony 4K Bravia X85J 43Inch TV 120Hz
Case MinisForum NAB6 Lite Case
Audio Device(s) Built In Realtek Digital Audio HD
Power Supply 120w External Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 Lightsync
Keyboard Atrix RGB Slim Keyboard
VR HMD ( ◔ ʖ̯ ◔ )
Software Windows 11 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do them anymore.
Looking good, I mainly want to know & probably everyone else is IPC gains if there is any? :(
 
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
1,849 (0.27/day)
System Name Air Cooled Caselabs BH8
Processor Intel Coffee Lake 8700K @ 4.7
Motherboard MSI Gaming M5
Cooling Noctua D15s, 5x 140mm Noctua Chromax, 1x 120mm Noctua Chromax, 2x 80mm Noctua fans
Memory G. Skill Trident Z RGB series 3200mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS STRIX GTX 1080
Storage Samsung EVO 840 250gb SSD, Samung EVO PRO 256gb SSD, 2 TB WD Black Edition HDD.
Display(s) 24" Asus Gaming ROG 144hz
Case Black Caselabs BH8
Power Supply 850w EVGA SuperNOVA G2 Gold PSU with individually sleeved black cables
Mouse Logitech Wireless G403
Keyboard Corsair Mechanical Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 10
Looking very, very good. Glad I held out on upgrading my system. Coffee lake it is (8700k).
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.87/day)
Looking good, I mainly want to know & probably everyone else is IPC gains if there is any? :(

They often mask IPC increase within clock bumps so people think they increased IPC where it's basically just a gain from clock bump. If it was so easy to just keep on adding 10-15% IPC with each release, then CPU's should be ridiculously faster now with 1 thread compared to just 3-4 generations back. We're talking ~50% IPC boost over such period of time. But we know that's not really true.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,528 (1.77/day)
Looking good, I mainly want to know & probably everyone else is IPC gains if there is any? :(
Maybe a couple of percentage points if we're lucky, will need to see results at fixed clock & no turbo to get a fair(er) assessment.
Too bad not many review do so these days, we see stock vs stock which doesn't really tell us anything about IPC.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.87/day)
IPC specifically, no, but it tell sus how product behaves out of the box. Most people don't actually overlcock...
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,528 (1.77/day)
IPC specifically, no, but it tell sus how product behaves out of the box. Most people don't actually overlcock...
Not about OC, but would love to see another objective review.
As in all else being equal i.e. RAM speed, clock speed et al how does processor A fare vs processor B or C.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,437 (1.43/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Doesn't look bad but I kinda agree with R0H1T. I'd like to see the proper IPC gains not with the higher clocks for the newer CPU's. I know they have bumped the frequency but it may have lower the OC potential with this? I think I will wait for review but if the figures Intel specified for the 8th gen CPU's are true it's pretty solid gain.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
549 (0.13/day)
Location
Bulgaria
System Name Black Knight | White Queen
Processor Intel Core i9-10940X (28 cores) | Intel Core i7-5775C (8 cores)
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore X299G | ASUS Sabertooth Z97 Mark S (White)
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 chromax.black | Xigmatek Dark Knight SD-1283 Night Hawk (White)
Memory G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 4x8GB DDR4 3600MHz CL16 | Corsair Vengeance LP 4x4GB DDR3L 1600MHz CL9 (White)
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4090 OC | KFA2/Galax GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Hall of Fame Edition
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, 980 Pro 1TB, 850 Pro 256GB, 840 Pro 256GB, WD 10TB+ (incl. VelociRaptors)
Display(s) Dell Alienware AW2721D 240Hz| LG OLED evo C4 48" 144Hz
Case Corsair 7000D AIRFLOW (Black) | NZXT ??? w/ ASUS DRW-24B1ST
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence STX | Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 1250W 85+ | Super Flower Leadex Gold 650W (White)
Mouse Razer Basilisk Ultimate, Razer Naga Trinity | Razer Mamba 16000
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2 (Orange switch) | Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Let's see if this CPU will take the crown of best gaming CPU from 5775C.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,436 (3.28/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Looks exactly like the kind of scaling one would expect with the extra cores and given clocks , IPC gains are pretty much non existent. However this is definitely a step forward.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
113 (0.03/day)
Location
Toronto
"to be a formidable opponent to the Ryzen 7-1800X." --- you own amd stock or somethin? gtfo, it's at least equal or FASTER in MT with 2 fewer cores and REKTS 1800x left, right and sideways in ST, while clearly being able to clock to 5Ghz.

http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3797188 here are new GB scores for 8700k @ 3.7Ghz. Take a hint, AMDones.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
1,190 (0.27/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Deepcool LS520 SE
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG GL850
Case Dan A4 H2O
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 11 pro
"to be a formidable opponent to the Ryzen 7-1800X." --- you own amd stock or somethin? gtfo, it's at least equal or FASTER in MT with 2 fewer cores and REKTS 1800x left, right and sideways in ST, while clearly being able to clock to 5Ghz.

http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3797188 here are new GB scores for 8700k @ 3.7Ghz. Take a hint, AMDones.
To be fair, even a ryzen 5 at lower clock can do better than a ryzen 7 on geek bench:
6 cores:
http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3821555
8 cores:
http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3821655
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
113 (0.03/day)
Location
Toronto
To be fair, even a ryzen 5 at lower clock can do better than a ryzen 7 on geek bench:
6 cores:
http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3821555
8 cores:
http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3821655

Ehhh.... not sure if blind or trollin.... look at the OC and the scores, both are OCed to shits and both are WAY slower than 8700k at stock 3.7 in ST and MT (see results in my link^^). 8700k @ stock completely annihilates a 4Ghz OCed 1700x. Gee, it's soo bad, it's embarrassing...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
1,190 (0.27/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Deepcool LS520 SE
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG GL850
Case Dan A4 H2O
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 11 pro
Ehhh.... not sure if blind or trollin.... look at the OC and the scores, both are OCed to shits and both are WAY slower than 8700k at stock 3.7 in ST and MT (see results in my link^^). 8700k @ stock completely annihilates a 4Ghz OCed 1700x. Gee, it's soo bad, it's embarrassing...
When did I talked about the 8700k ? i was only saying that a ryzen 6 cores can beat a ryzen 8 cores, even when the ryzen 6 cores is lower clocked than the 8 core one.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,436 (3.28/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
I think some should sweep these threads and get rid of the trolls.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
113 (0.03/day)
Location
Toronto
When did I talk about the 8700k ? i was only saying that a ryzen 6 cores can beat a ryzen 8 cores, even when the ryzen 6 cores is lower clocked than the 8 core one.
Ooops my bad, misread it completely. Not sure about R6, but the scores you've provided are for heavily OC cpus, 1800x can get there too. So if everything else stays the same, 1800x performs better in stock than these two OC, and still looses heavily to 8700k at stock. Imagine it being OC to 5 on all 6 cores. It's probably going to be 40-50+% faster than ryzen in games.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,897 (0.81/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name Boomer Master Race
Processor Intel Core i5 12600H
Motherboard MinisForum NAB6 Lite Board
Cooling Mini PC Cooling
Memory Apacer 16GB 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Storage Kingston 512GB SSD
Display(s) Sony 4K Bravia X85J 43Inch TV 120Hz
Case MinisForum NAB6 Lite Case
Audio Device(s) Built In Realtek Digital Audio HD
Power Supply 120w External Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 Lightsync
Keyboard Atrix RGB Slim Keyboard
VR HMD ( ◔ ʖ̯ ◔ )
Software Windows 11 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do them anymore.
I think some should sweep these threads and get rid of the trolls.

You read my mind, this site is losing it's charm. :mad:

Modders??? o_O
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
1,190 (0.27/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Deepcool LS520 SE
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG GL850
Case Dan A4 H2O
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 11 pro
Ooops my bad, misread it completely. Not sure about R6, but the scores you've provided are for heavily OC cpus, 1800x can get there too. So if everything else stays the same, 1800x performs better in stock than these two OC, and still looses heavily to 8700k at stock. Imagine it being OC to 5 on all 6 cores. It's probably going to be 40-50+% faster than ryzen in games.
But don't forget that the turbo boost of intel is more aggressive than the turbo of Ryzen. The 8700k can reach 4.30 GHz on all core, and 4.60 Ghz on one core. So the 3.7Ghz is misleading. The current Ryzen can't reach clock as high, and geekbench isn't the best tool to measure real world performance. The results showed in the 2 link that I've showed don't even make sense there is no way for a ryzen 5 to beat a ryzen 7 with higher clock in Mt. I'd rather wait for real world bench.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,329 (1.18/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Ryzen 7 7700X Super Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling DeepCool AK620 with Arctic Silver 5
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 EXPO (CL30)
Video Card(s) XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Storage Samsung 980 EVO 1 TB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV272U (DisplayPort) and Acer Nitro XV270U (DisplayPort)
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH C
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound / Sony WH-XB910N Bluetooth Headphones
Power Supply MSI A850GF
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Steelseries
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
Very interesting. It looks like this series of new processors would be a significant upgrade compared to my current Core i5-3570K. Very good Intel!

This is what competition does for consumers! It makes things better!
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,986 (0.78/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
i7-8700K/i7-7800X will offer great competition to R7 1800X/TR 1900X.

Looking good, I mainly want to know & probably everyone else is IPC gains if there is any? :(
There are no IPC gains in either Kaby Lake nor Coffee Lake. The next IPC improvement will be in Intel's next architecture Ice Lake, due late 2018.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,550 (0.96/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> RX7800XT
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
all comes down the price now, Im sure (because we are still in the current landscape) the 8700k does better in gaming but I highly doubt it will be better in many other tasks.

Again, price, release this for 380 euro and sure you got a good one, release it for 500 or above (aka equal to the 1800x) aaand im not so sure, but that is my perspective.

Very interesting. It looks like this series of new processors would be a significant upgrade compared to my current Core i5-3570K. Very good Intel!

This is what competition does for consumers! It makes things better!

yeah but should you reward the money hungry company that did not do jack sh*t while AMD was trying to recover from their Bulldozer experiment?
Or should you reward the underdog that finally has made something that can compete so they can develop more better cpu's in the future.

If you truly want competition, now is the time to get AMD, its not like you will suffer from the purchase.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.56/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Where my money goes doesn't have "jack shit" to do with a company resting on their Laurels or being an underdog. I will spend what money I need for the performance I need and want. If I want more IPC and better overclocking, I go Intel. If I want more cores for the money, go Ryzen. It's really that simple (to me).
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
345 (0.08/day)
System Name Off-Brand PC System
Processor 2990WX
Motherboard X399
Cooling Wraithripper
Video Card(s) Vega 64
Benchmark Scores Less than Intel and Nvidia
all comes down the price now, Im sure (because we are still in the current landscape) the 8700k does better in gaming but I highly doubt it will be better in many other tasks.

Again, price, release this for 380 euro and sure you got a good one, release it for 500 or above (aka equal to the 1800x) aaand im not so sure, but that is my perspective.
7800x had no problem beating the 1800x most of the time in multithreaded work with 2 lesser cores. 1800x was already made overpriced by the r7 1700 and now retarded by the 8700k.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11550...core-i9-7900x-i7-7820x-and-i7-7800x-tested/10
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
305 (0.05/day)
Location
WA, USA
System Name Desktop
Processor AMD Ryzen 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix B450-I
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock TF 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600
Video Card(s) AMD RX 6800
Storage 480GB MyDigitalSSD NVME
Display(s) AOC CU34G2X
Power Supply 850w
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3
Keyboard Steelseries Apex 5
To be fair, even a ryzen 5 at lower clock can do better than a ryzen 7 on geek bench:
6 cores:
http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3821555
8 cores:
http://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3821655

Ehhh.... not sure if blind or trollin.... look at the OC and the scores, both are OCed to shits and both are WAY slower than 8700k at stock 3.7 in ST and MT (see results in my link^^). 8700k @ stock completely annihilates a 4Ghz OCed 1700x. Gee, it's soo bad, it's embarrassing...

The 1700X was using 2166 RAM. lol

My 1700X modestly OC'd to 3.9ghz still outpaces the 8700K in multithreaded. Hopefully single core improves in the next revision.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/compare/3829403?baseline=3797188
 
Last edited:
Top