• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Philips Announces the 328P8K 8K UHD Monitor With HDR 400

Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
932 (0.13/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name 7950X
Processor R9 7950X
Motherboard Asus X670 Hero
Cooling Noctua DH15 black edition
Memory 64GB (4 x 16GB) 6000 MT/s
Video Card(s) Radeon RX7900XT
Storage Firecuda 540
Display(s) Samsung Q95T
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)
Er, not really, no, it will still be the same % slower/faster overall assuming perfect scaling. But it will also will depend on how well the drivers do actually scale and how many cards the chosen system/vendor will support.

For example if Vega drivers were to scale better the % slower would actually decrease, conversly, if they were poorer. But outside the scaling factor, the overal % does not change because you are adding more cards.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,683 (4.04/day)
Location
Houston
System Name Moving into the mobile space
Processor 7940HS
Motherboard HP trash
Cooling HP trash
Memory 2x8GB
Video Card(s) 4070 mobile
Storage 512GB+2TB NVME
Display(s) some 165hz thing that isn't as nice as it sounded
Er, not really, no, it will still be the same % slower/faster overall assuming perfect scaling. But it will also will depend on how well the drivers do actually scale and how many cards the chosen system/vendor will support.

For example if Vega drivers were to scale better the % slower would actually decrease, conversly, if they were poorer. But outside the scaling factor, the overal % does not change because you are adding more cards.

3 cards that are 10-15% slower each are going to be 30-45% slower overall vs 3 of the competing cards. It isn't just one card that is slower all of them are, those losses don't magically disappear when you have more.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
932 (0.13/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name 7950X
Processor R9 7950X
Motherboard Asus X670 Hero
Cooling Noctua DH15 black edition
Memory 64GB (4 x 16GB) 6000 MT/s
Video Card(s) Radeon RX7900XT
Storage Firecuda 540
Display(s) Samsung Q95T
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)
No, they are not, they will still be 10-15% slower overall versus 3 of the other cards that the single card was that much slower than (assuming equal scaling).

There is no difference as it is a PERCENTAGE - a relative PROPORTION.

Work it out yourself. Take a single Ti and call it 100FPS and the V64 at 90 FPS, then work out the % for that and the % for 3 x each ...
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,683 (4.04/day)
Location
Houston
System Name Moving into the mobile space
Processor 7940HS
Motherboard HP trash
Cooling HP trash
Memory 2x8GB
Video Card(s) 4070 mobile
Storage 512GB+2TB NVME
Display(s) some 165hz thing that isn't as nice as it sounded
No, they are not, they will still be 10-15% slower overall versus 3 of the other cards that the single card was that much slower than (assuming equal scaling).

There is no difference as it is a PERCENTAGE - a relative PROPORTION.

Work it out yourself. Take a single Ti and call it 100FPS and the V64 at 90 FPS, then work out the % for that and the % for 3 x each ...

You are correct I was adding frames together not percentages. That is my bad, however 10-15% compounds pretty damn quickly let's take your example and be more realistic. One 1080Ti at 100FPS and one V64 at 80FPS, that means two would be 200 vs 160 and three would be 300 vs 240FPS. Those are pretty big differences.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
932 (0.13/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name 7950X
Processor R9 7950X
Motherboard Asus X670 Hero
Cooling Noctua DH15 black edition
Memory 64GB (4 x 16GB) 6000 MT/s
Video Card(s) Radeon RX7900XT
Storage Firecuda 540
Display(s) Samsung Q95T
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)
LOL.

It's still the same % difference though. ;) It maybe looks worse wit ha 60fps gap, but isn't really.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,683 (4.04/day)
Location
Houston
System Name Moving into the mobile space
Processor 7940HS
Motherboard HP trash
Cooling HP trash
Memory 2x8GB
Video Card(s) 4070 mobile
Storage 512GB+2TB NVME
Display(s) some 165hz thing that isn't as nice as it sounded
LOL.

It's still the same % difference though. ;) It maybe looks worse wit ha 60fps gap, but isn't really.

It is 60FPS is not a small number.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
932 (0.13/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name 7950X
Processor R9 7950X
Motherboard Asus X670 Hero
Cooling Noctua DH15 black edition
Memory 64GB (4 x 16GB) 6000 MT/s
Video Card(s) Radeon RX7900XT
Storage Firecuda 540
Display(s) Samsung Q95T
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)
When it's 240 to 300 it isn't, it's still a small %. :)

If it was 10 to 70 it would be a major thing but then that would be a much larger % difference.

Anyway, lets leave that there as it's got a bit O/T at this point! :)
 
Top