• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Micron To Release QLC NAND-Based Drives in 2018 to the Server Environment

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.24/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Micron has announced that they will be introducing QLC (Quad Level Cell) NAND-based, own brand drives for the server environment this year. The new QLC drives are expected to boost maximum storage density (and price per GB) closer to that of mechanical HDDs, which is why Micron is positioning drives based on this memory technology as data center-class SSDs for the nearline storage market. The company is positioning these drives as replacement options for 7,200 RPM HDDs for workloads that require heavy reads of stored information - thus offsetting QLC NAND's lower endurance when it comes to available maximum writes on the drives' cells.

It's a known trade-off when it comes to the NAND world: higher amounts of bits per cell to represent information means that there must be much increased accuracy when it comes to reading a given cell's voltage state. While SLC NAND only tracks two voltage states, MLC (2-bits per cell) tracks four voltage states, TLC doubles that to eight voltage states, and QLC doubles the ante again for a maximum 16 voltage states, where each voltage state represents data on the cell. Of course, with repeat writes and voltage changes, accuracy and capacity for the cell to maintain its given voltage tend to drop, which leads to incorrect information and thus corrupted data or those cells to be rendered inoperative. This is one of the reasons for manufacturers to include overprovisioning in their NAND-based solutions.





That means these drives are much better suited for WORM workloads (Write Once, Read Many). The drive will be positioned below the existing 5200-series SSDs, and carry features aimed at hyperscale data centers.Perhaps Micron has developed a built-in resilience in its NAND chips to the deterioration that's expected from QLC drives, or maybe they've found a way to best or equal Toshiba, who announced last year that it had managed to increase endurance of its 3D QLC NAND flash to 1000 program/erase cycles by using a stronger ECC mechanism.



The first batch of Micron-branded, QLC-based SSDs will have a SATA interface, though Micron said it is planning to release NVMe models. These will hit the enterprise markets first - where Micron has an easier task of recouping their investment due to higher revenue, while simultaneously allowing the company to take some more time to increase yields before adding the consumer demand strain to the equation. However, users should expect QLC-based drives to become real alternatives not too long after.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.94/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
QLC. So most hard drives would be able to outlast these flimsy QLC SSD then.
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2018
Messages
225 (0.09/day)
System Name Dreamstation2
Processor Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
Cooling Hyper 212 Black Edition
Memory Kingston HyperX 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Aorus 2080 Ti Turbo (sounds like a vaccum cleaner at full load)
Storage 2 x 1TB M.2 NVME + 1TB 2.5" SSD
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G7 32" 4k
Case NZXT H500i
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar U3 / Audio-Technica ATH-M50x / Edifier R1855DB
Power Supply Corsair TX650M
Mouse Corsair Scimitar Pro RGB
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
QLC. So most hard drives would be able to outlast these flimsy QLC SSD then.
Yup, that was my first reaction - QLC - thanks but, "no thanks". Reducing the reliability 2 times compared to TLC (16 states vs 8) just to get +25% capacity is bad. But well, maybe some new error-correction chip can take care of that without reducing transfer speed a lot. The reduced write speed and fast wear are still a concern.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,042 (0.34/day)
Location
Pristina
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz ZXR
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
Well they are for servers so who cares.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,761 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Incidentally, that picture does a great job explaining why the more data you squeeze in a cell, the longer it takes to access it: you can visually see how it gets harder to read it.
Of course, the actual reading is not visual, but the effect is virtually the same.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,528 (1.77/day)
Yup, that was my first reaction - QLC - thanks but, "no thanks". Reducing the reliability 2 times compared to TLC (16 states vs 8) just to get +25% capacity is bad. But well, maybe some new error-correction chip can take care of that without reducing transfer speed a lot. The reduced write speed and fast wear are still a concern.
Except their reliability isn't reduced, it's endurance that goes down!
2018-02-15_22-13-58.png

Considering some of the best TLC NAND have writes guaranteed in PB, they'll still exceed that, I have no idea why QLC should be scorned especially if they make SSD even cheaper?
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,761 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Except their reliability isn't reduced, it's endurance that goes down!
View attachment 97255
Considering some of the best TLC NAND have writes guaranteed in PB, they'll still exceed that, I have no idea why QLC should be scorned especially if they make SSD even cheaper?
I believe it's more of psychological reaction.
SSDs have made us more aware of the fact that storage doesn't last forever. These days SSDs last longer than mechanical drives, but the psychological factor lingers on. Couple that with the general knowledge that making cells smaller reduces endurance and that reviews don't usually talk about endurance at all (in part because it's freaking hard to tell how many years a SSD will last) and the generic feeling of unknown when talking about a new product and you get an instinctive reluctance.
You may add to the list above the fact that manufacturers don't seem to forward about how they mitigate the electrical charge getting increasingly smaller.
I could add a few more things, but I think you get the gist already.
 
Top