• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Hades Canyon" NUC Armed with Vega M Plays Anything at 1080p

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,796 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
It's sad AMD doesn't have the resources to develop a custom SoC like this one. Imagine R5 1400 instead of the Intel quad-core... the price would have been 150$ cheaper at least and a killer deal for laptops.
One step at a time. They don't have the resources to fight on all fronts at the same time.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2009
Messages
424 (0.07/day)
One step at a time. They don't have the resources to fight on all fronts at the same time.

While they theoretically could make it on their own, they are using Intel's money for all the design/engineering. If it's a flop commercially they lose nothing. They still gain the experience though. And this is a step towards the endgame. A SOC with CPU/GPU/Memory all stacked on one 3D design (eventually).
 
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
224 (0.04/day)
This is truly a marvel of engineering. This much CPU+GPU horsepower to footprint ratio was science fiction not too long ago.
Good job Intel and AMD on this coop

It is very impressive but don't forget about the Xbox One X chip, that has significantly high GPU specs: 2560 vs 1536 Stream Processors, 160 vs 96 TMUs but ok no RAM.

The specs on the PS5 should really be something special, we will be in the realms of 7nm + Zen 2 + Navi + HBM3.
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
1,693 (0.38/day)
System Name Meh
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Tomahawk
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit
Memory 32GB G.Skill @ 6000/CL30
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom / Undervolt + OC
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB + WD SN850X 1TB + 64TB NAS/Server
Display(s) 27" 1440p IPS @ 360 Hz + 32" 4K/UHD QD-OLED @ 240 Hz + 77" 4K/UHD QD-OLED @ 144 Hz VRR
Case Fractal Design North XL
Audio Device(s) FiiO DAC
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x / Native 12VHPWR
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight + Razer Deathadder V3 Pro
Keyboard Corsair K60 Pro / MX Low Profile Speed
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
That's some ultra low-end garbage
 
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
224 (0.04/day)
That's some ultra low-end garbage

nVidia fan by any chance?

TBF, we are talking about a single chip solution that was designed to be fairly cheap plus, your 980ti is only 23% faster than this 'ultra low-end garbage'.
 

Attachments

  • Xbox One X.JPG
    Xbox One X.JPG
    156.5 KB · Views: 502
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 16, 2018
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
nVidia fan by any chance?

TBF, we are talking about a single chip solution that was designed to be fairly cheap plus, your 980ti is only 23% faster than this 'ultra low-end garbage'.

Ok...23%.. for some reason the score seems to be more than 23%...

(scores for 980ti taken from guru3d / TPU)
The Division
GTX980Ti: 81 fps
HC NUC: 46.8 fps

TW Warhammer 2
GTX980Ti: 89 fps
HC NUC: 30.1 fps

For Honor
GTX980Ti: 106 fps
HC NUC: 59.78 fps

3DMark Firestrike
GTX980Ti: 15656
HC NUC: 11357
 
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
224 (0.04/day)
Ok...23%.. for some reason the score seems to be more than 23%...

(scores for 980ti taken from guru3d / TPU)
The Division
GTX980Ti: 81 fps
HC NUC: 46.8 fps

TW Warhammer 2
GTX980Ti: 89 fps
HC NUC: 30.1 fps

For Honor
GTX980Ti: 106 fps
HC NUC: 59.78 fps

3DMark Firestrike
GTX980Ti: 15656
HC NUC: 11357

That 23% score is for the Xbox One X Vs 980ti, the Xbox's chip is more more powerful than this new Hades Canyon chip from Intel.
 
Top