• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Samsung, Micron, and Hynix Reportedly Slapped with Colossal Antitrust Fines

Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
2,544 (0.38/day)
Location
People's Republic of America
System Name It's just a computer
Processor i9-14900K Direct Die
Motherboard MSI Z790 ACE MAX
Cooling 2X D5T Vario, XSPC BayRes, 3X Nemesis GTR560, NF-A14-iPPC3000PWM, NF-A14-iPPC2000PWM, IceMan DD
Memory TEAMGROUP FFXD548G8000HC38EDC01
Video Card(s) MSI 4070 Ti Super w/Alphacool Eisblock Aurora RTX 4070TI Ventus with Backplate :13724
Storage Samsung 990 PRO 1TB M.2
Display(s) LG 32GK650F
Case Thermaltake Xaser VI
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Meridian 7.1 2G/Z-5500
Power Supply Seasonic Prime PX-1300
Mouse Logitech
Keyboard Logitech
Software Win11PRO
Ofc the fines benefit the Government but it's not that Government benefits: it's that the infringing companies get penalized.

If @ all possible (via legislation, perhaps), a good chunk of such fines should be distributed to those that applied for it, via proof they were among the victims (invoices).

And subsequently, the cost of those penalties will eventually get passed on to the end consumer anyway.

I agree that repaying those actually wronged would be the fairest solution.

But you're argument is that the people that were ripped off, tax payers*, should instead pay more money in the form of taxes to pay for the imprisonment of these blue collar criminals? That doesn't make much sense to me.

The fines are a decent compromise. It takes away the thing that is currently most important to these people, their money.

However, the fines are not high enough, IMO. Samsung alone makes almost $225 Billion a year, so even if they get the maximum of $8 Billion in fines, it doesn't really deter them from continuing the practice of price fixing(obviously since this is like the 2nd or 3rd time they've been caught doing it). They need to be fined in the $100s of Billions against the company, as well as personal fines against the management people involved that is proportional to their yearly income, ~50% of their yearly income. The tiny monetary slaps on the wrist that they do right now does nothing to deter price fixing.

*The argument can be made that essentially every tax payer is a victim here, since anyone with an any modern electronic device is effectively a victim. And there likely aren't a lot of tax payers that have no modern electronic device.

How many white collar criminals are we talking about, a few dozen? A mere drop in the bucket, and, any fines would more than pay for their incarceration anyway.

You would suggest crippling fines that could potentially cause many, many workers to lose their jobs, because the company may no longer have the resources to effectively maintain their workforce?
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,664 (0.77/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 5800X3D
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 6600 8 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
And subsequently, the cost of those penalties will eventually get passed on to the end consumer anyway.

I agree that repaying those actually wronged would be the fairest solution.



How many white collar criminals are we talking about, a few dozen? A mere drop in the bucket, and, any fines would more than pay for their incarceration anyway.

You would suggest crippling fines that could potentially cause many, many workers to lose their jobs, because the company may no longer have the resources to effectively maintain their workforce?

If it's the "small" $8 billion fine, i can totally see that happening but if the fines were anything like i suggested in a previous reply, i seriously doubt it. They could increase prices in an attempt to mitigate the losses from fines BUT no way would it amount to the sort of values in question, which is why i think it would work as deterrent.

However, and until the laws are changed to enable these types of fines, companies executives can get away with these sorts of practices because any eventual fines can:

- cost less than the revenue obtained from the infringement(s) in the 1st place
- be mitigated / countered by further rise in prices, like you suggested

Unless fines are high enough to counter this sort of thing, which is why i suggested a "small" 30+% annual income fine.
 
Top