NVIDIA "GT104" Based GeForce GTX 1180 Surfaces on Vietnamese Stores

[cucker tarlson]

Just to think that asus wouldn't have thrown in another bunch of leds on the new series card is insanity. I bet there's going to be led illuminated power connectors and heatsink fins on the new ROG cards. BTW I think from 1080Ti on, nvidia requires AIBs to include "geforce gtx" on the side.

 

[bug]

No it doesn't. New actual models always jump major numbers. Which is GTX 1xxx and GTX 2xxx. With this logic, it should be called GTX 1090 and still make sense somehow as brand new GPU... Which is why I'm questioning this numbering decision if real.

Man you seem to have a lot of of bones to pick with Nvidia lately...

 

[cucker tarlson]

Man you seem to have of bones to pick with Nvidia lately...

Even about naming scheme.
This guy is a baby

 

[brumak51]

oh deer...

 

[megamanxtreme]

They skipped a year, why not 1280?

 

[SDR82]

Well, the current GPU generation is called the "Geforce 10 Series" (read "ten" and not "one thousand", OK). Before Pascal, Nvidia incremented the number in the series by 100, starting with the Geforce 100 Series all the way up to the 900 series, where that naming scheme ended. Going forward the series numbers will increase by +1 instead of +100. Hence the next generation will be the "Geforce 11 Series".

 

[TheoneandonlyMrK]

You literally have to ask? 0_o ? When in history has a whole new model only had a second digit increased? Like, ever in the last 2 decades of graphic card models?

480/580fermi to kepler ,680/780 8series got jumped so 780 to 980 kepler to pascal 980/1080 refresh then 1180 there are four hardware iterations ,i get you though but 1000 jump to 2080 is probably overstating the performance uplift for what it is imho.
7nm or not is actually a more interesting question ,since Nvidias naming schemes are total balls these days anyway and are now a unreliable means of identification given their propensity to name two completely different skus the same all the time.

 

[Vya Domus]

Having nothing to discuss other than naming schemes shows just how "exciting" Nvidia's next generation products are.

 

[LiveOrDie]

Sounds fake when ever has a aftermarket version has been posted up before the reference version, if you look at the 11 in the 1180 the number spacing you can see it's been photoshopped, there to far apart compared to all of the other font.

 

[bug]

Having nothing to discuss other than naming schemes shows just how "exciting" Nvidia's next generation products are.

Well, the name is all we know. Plus, now we know it's Turing, a relative of Volta. What else would you want us to talk about at this point?
Oh and I almost forgot: this is a xx80 card, so it's not an architecture "built for the mid-range, because that's where most sales happen"

 

[ppn]

Well 1080 Ti has 11GB at 11Ghz and 11Gflops. 1 missed naming opportunity there.

 

[Legacy-ZA]

All I can say is; the next graphics card I buy. needs 16GB of VRAM and be on the next nm process, be it 7 or 5.

 

[Vya Domus]

All I can say is; the next graphics card I buy. needs 16GB of VRAM and be on the next nm process, be it 7 or 5.

I think "need" is used too liberally in this case. By "need" I understand that it cannot be viable without and nothing really points out to that.

 

[cucker tarlson]

480/580fermi to kepler ,680/780 8series got jumped so 780 to 980 kepler to pascal 980/1080 refresh then 1180 there are four hardware iterations ,i get you though but 1000 jump to 2080 is probably overstating the performance uplift for what it is imho.
7nm or not is actually a more interesting question ,since Nvidias naming schemes are total balls these days anyway and are now a unreliable means of identification given their propensity to name two completely different skus the same all the time.

Still not as misleading as rebranding 480 as 580 and 290 as 390.
btw AMD did the same thing with rx560, but cut the cards after the initial reviews, and did it secretly. Tell me that wasn't intentional Just like their fake launch msrp for vega to get better initial reviews. You know, the real shady stuff that adoretv doesn't mention on his channel.

 

[ssdpro]

Yeah, it has gone up by 100 because the numbers were in hundreds, not thousands... Comparing apples to peanuts...

You have a cognitive problem or a math problem, the other users are correct.
580>680>780>OEM>980>1080. +100 equals 1180. Going +100>+100>+100>OEM>+100+100+1000 wouldn't make sense other than pleasing a noob by sounding like an epic jump.

On a more topical note, 409.6 GB/s memory bandwidth from 256 is awesome.

 

[qubit]

Gtxx sounds really cool.


It makes perfect sense. It went from 9xx to 10xx and now to 11xx. 20xx would be a quantum leap.

No it doesn't. New actual models always jump major numbers. Which is GTX 1xxx and GTX 2xxx. With this logic, it should be called GTX 1090 and still make sense somehow as brand new GPU... Which is why I'm questioning this numbering decision if real.

Yeah, it does make sense. It's gone Maxwell, Pascal, Turing. Three different architectures. Why the hell should it jump the numbering system? I think you just like arguing again.

 

[cucker tarlson]

I think "need" is used too liberally in this case. By "need" I understand that it cannot be viable without and nothing really points out to that.

I think the stuff that comes out in 2019 (new metro etc.) will verify that. I think the jump from 4GB to 6-8 was very significant, but I don't think we'll see midrange cards require 10-12GB too soon.

 

[oxidized]

This is fake most likely, but i still think it'll be series 11, makes much more sense than 20, although it sounds a bit worse.

 

[AsRock]

No it doesn't. New actual models always jump major numbers. Which is GTX 1xxx and GTX 2xxx. With this logic, it should be called GTX 1090 and still make sense somehow as brand new GPU... Which is why I'm questioning this numbering decision if real.

Well they have nothing to worry about with numbering for many many more years this one, plenty of time in case they think of some thing else up in mean time . And will have people understanding the numbering system for a much longer time.

Although how cards are coming out these day even jumping to 1k on each range would take a long ass time.

 

[R0H1T]

Well they have nothing to worry about with numbering for many many more years this one, plenty of time in case they think of some thing else up in mean time . And will have people understanding the numbering system for a much longer time.

Although how cards are coming out these day even jumping to 1k on each range would take a long ass time.

There's always the XTGTXX route they could take, I mean AMD have pretty much abandoned the ATI love for confusing nomenclature, maybe Nvidia picks it up
Surely Roman numerals are better to understand than the decimal system

 

[oxidized]

I still like better the old naming scheme, the one with GT GTS and GTX but whatever...

 

[Octopuss]

Rejzor, are you having a shitty day? Why are you caught in endless loop of nonsense arguments about model numbers? You can do better than that

 

[cucker tarlson]

There's always the XTGTXX route they could take,

Or they could name themselves the name of that rapper.

 

[RejZoR]

Rejzor, are you having a shitty day? Why are you caught in endless loop of nonsense arguments about model numbers? You can do better than that

No, I just like looking at people going absolutely ape just because it's me typing whatever I type. It's amusing watching people meltdown over absurdities while they think I'm having a meltdown. It's absolutely beautiful.

 

[R0H1T]

Or they could name themselves the name of that rapper.

Tbh he has a point about better nomenclature that clearly defines what you're buying, we badly need this in the computing industry when model numbers are recycled like anything! Hey does anyone remember what gen of Core we're on?