ASRock Product Roadmap Detailed; No New AMD Cards Until February 2019?

[JRMBelgium]

I get that you would like people to buy AMD for whatever reason it is you posted but seriously stop cause it's getting embarrasingly desperate. Seriously, you want me to be shocked about a 5% difference in results between 390 and 980 over the course of three years from a source you can't even link directly ?

btw I'd like to see those results of Fury X now matching 980Ti. You didn't provide the link, you didn't even provide the name of the site.You very vaguely specified the geographical location. Here, this is how you do this

take a few latests games and compare 980ti vs fury x at 1440p, resolution they're mostly used for


http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-Crew-2-Spiel-60966/Specials/Benchmark-Test-Review-1259989/
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Wreck...54915/Specials/Benchmark-Test-Review-1259053/
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Juras...ials/Benchmark-Test-Review-Bewertung-1258464/

Fury X loses in all of them,980Ti is 49% faster on average. How does Fury X compare to 980Ti in 2018 ? Twice as bad than it did in 2015.
Even if that was true that Fury X matches 980Ti and not something you made up or a site cherry picked, no one cares about it three years after the release. 980Ti has been faster all its life.

You're fake news, Sir.

There ya go:
https://be.hardware.info/reviews/83...chips-hertest-hardwareinfo-gpu-prestatiescore

I cant believe that AMD has nothing after 1 full year of mining feast. even the fact how Vega uncompetitive was at lauch should be a wake up call to AMD... instead AMD to them selves was like : "look how good this Vega sells for x2 price, man we really must have made the best product, lets just chill and not worry about GPU stuff, we got dis for long time to come"

Eeuhm, AMD HD 7000 series, 200 series, 300 series, all based on same technology with only minor differences. Take in to account two years of research before the HD 7xxx got released, that's 5 years for just one architecture. If you look at the 400/500 series, it's also just an improved design on 14nm instead of 28nm. That's why the performance difference on each "generation" is that small. The Vega 64 release was the first release in years that actually had 20% performance increase. And if they could do better, they would have done better. But if you look at the power consumption on Vega, they simply couldn't do better at that time.

And if I'm not mistaking, Nvidia hasn't done much either in the last year becides releasing the 1070TI ( because of Vega 56 ) and they have a research budget that is 4 times higher for GPU's. And for some reason you are mad at David but not at Goliath?

 

[cucker tarlson]

I actually have been on this site before, I liked their HDD roundup. Analyzed some of the results, Fury X looks good compared to 980Ti. Problem is Fury X performance is a rollercoaster. I linked some 2018 games earlier, now have a look at some late 2017 ones too

https://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficz...duty_wwii_dramat_graczy_i_zolnierzy?page=0,10
https://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficz..._s_creed_origins_problemy_w_egipcie?page=0,10