Extravagant Intel Core i9-9900K Packaging Pictured

[hat]

Yeah don't know about everyone else, but excluding the cats, my household enjoys the contents more...

That, along with a nod to MGS... wonder if anyone else will think about that before reaching this post?

Sorry, not sure what you are bubbling about. Football and "soccer" are the same thing. That's why is called FIFA and not FISA.
That overly boring abomination called USA Rugby just stole the name from the REAL sport that is actually using THE FEET to play the ball, not hands

We Americans noticed that overly boring abomination called football many years ago, and we thought it was a name too good for such a silly sport, so we reappropriated it to our totally awesome "USA football" and gave the name soccer to your silly sport. The rest of the world doesn't have to like it, but we just didn't want to bore Americans with soccer when they thought they were gonna see FOOTBALL! However, we invite you to join us in embracing football and putting soccer in its place.

 

[btarunr]

Added more pictures of this low-poly football from FIFA 1998.

 

[gmn17]

What’s a good cooler for this proc?

 

[Prima.Vera]

We Americans noticed that overly boring abomination called football many years ago, and we thought it was a name too good for such a silly sport, so we reappropriated it to our totally awesome "USA football" and gave the name soccer to your silly sport. The rest of the world doesn't have to like it, but we just didn't want to bore Americans with soccer when they thought they were gonna see FOOTBALL! However, we invite you to join us in embracing football and putting soccer in its place.

I think "you" and the rest of the world have a different understanding of the word "boring"
I mean you still think Nascar is "driving" or a racing sport...

On topic now,
For that price, is that package containing liquid cooling cooler and pump? and some collectible too?

 

[ironcerealbox]

Well, it might be called football in 'Murica due to the sport using a prolate spheroid that is almost a foot long...just food for thought.

 

[dj-electric]

What’s a good cooler for this proc?

Depends of OC is included or not. If not, any 3-heatpipe 90MM+fan tower cooler pretty much would do the job. Heat conductivity is proper.

Also, many people in this thread seem to be confused regarding the target audience of this CPU, as per usual.

 

[remixedcat]

REALLY Intel, REALLY...... Who the F*ck cares what the box looks like...

Please explain exactly how many millions of $$ were derailed from the product development and mfgr'ing process to the packaging/marketing dept.....

I'm pretty sure 99.9999% of us here would prefer to have a better, higher performing/faster, cooler, AND cheaper cpu in a less-extravagant box rather than the other way around...

REALLY... WTF ?????????

Too many companies have bigger marketing than development budgets.

 

[Solid State Soul ( SSS )]

With the football design, intel should bundle FIFA 19 with this processor

What’s a good cooler for this proc?

- Noctua NH-D15
- Dark rock 4 pro

 

[GreiverBlade]

Except they're not the "same." As GPU becomes faster, the difference increases. You pay less for AMD, but you also get less from them. 9900k @ 5GHz will steal the the crown from our current emperor 8700k until Intel decides to usurp their own throne with Ice Lake.

View attachment 107857

i was not talking about games ... but well not much difference here too ... awwww crap (FX6300 to 4690K not much difference either... and i am not talking about benchmark ...)

8700K emperor? that one is also 100/200$ higher than a 2600X/2700X for me ... not worth it for a few fps difference (%'age show wider gap but the true difference is what ... 5-10 fps ... )
5GHZ on 1 core boost ...

and getting less but not much more less is not an issue.

Ryzen did shake up Intel but people still think there is an abyss in IPC between them (oh well ... waiting Ryzen 2 then )

 

[m4dn355]

 

[Melvis]

Just as I expected, this will cost around $760-$800 Australian which is basically double the price of the 2700X which is no where near going to be double the performance.

 

[Robcostyle]

Bwuahaha. 580$, without taxes ( I know you yanks pay them after the purchase), at amazon?
So, in EU its going to be 650€+margin+stock shortages....and we have 1000€ S1151 CPU! Nicely done!
And where are folks who claimed “competition is guuuud! It will lower da prices!”?

 

[GreiverBlade]

Helluva exotic engram there.

nice reference ... except it drops an unwanted exotic at a price i wouldn't even consider unless low range HEDT (personal opinion but i did like the reference... although the color is more ... a encrypted engram which would make it ... well ... )

And where are folks who claimed “competition is guuuud! It will lower da prices!”?

actually yep ... competition (red side) have a pretty capable CPU at a more decent price (and even if they counter with a 2800X slightly higher priced than the 2700X it will still be cheaper than the 9900K MSRP) and yep for me the 9900K will be 650-1000€ (580$ is the price of a 8700K most of the time for me)

 

[Vayra86]

Sorry, not sure what you are bubbling about. Football and "soccer" are the same thing. That's why is called FIFA and not FISA.
That overly boring abomination called USA Rugby just stole the name from the REAL sport that is actually using THE FEET to play the ball, not hands

Hear, hear!

And before we start on what's what... Football in Europe alone is pushing 22 billion in revenue yearly, Rugby across the entire world does just over 2.3 billion

Oh, and Europe has the largest share in both

Anyway, back to Intel's ugly soccer ball.

 

[HTC]

Bwuahaha. 580$, without taxes ( I know you yanks pay them after the purchase), at amazon?
So, in EU its going to be 650€+margin+stock shortages....and we have 1000€ S1151 CPU! Nicely done!
And where are folks who claimed “competition is guuuud! It will lower da prices!”?

It is "guuuud" so long as the performance is similar but the reverse is also true: if the price is too different while the performance is similar, there's the "danger" the lower price will increase to match it.

 

[Robcostyle]

there's the "danger" the lower price will increase to match it.

I think it's gonna be our reality soon. RX Vega is a pure example of that.

 

[Dante Uchiha]

Except they're not the "same." As GPU becomes faster, the difference increases. You pay less for AMD, but you also get less from them. 9900k @ 5GHz will steal the the crown from our current emperor 8700k until Intel decides to usurp their own throne with Ice Lake.

View attachment 107857

Unfortunately, in this resolution any processor will bottleneck the 2080 ti. This is a sign of IPC stagnation...

 

[HTC]

I think it's gonna be our reality soon. RX Vega is a pure example of that.

No because there were "unusual" circumstances on top of very high HBM prices: mining craze.

The proof is that it's already possible to find brand new Vega cards @ MSRP prices.

Were it not for the very expensive HBM RAM, i'm sure the MSRP would be much lower. nVidia's cards that also use HBM also cost a lot more so the extra HBM price is more diluted in those cases than in Vega's case.

 

[GlacierXD]

More than ugly in my opinion, especially comparing to AMD threadripper lineup.

 

[TheTechGuy1337]

I started busting out laughing, because it is cheaper than nvidia's rtx lineup at least.....I know that isn't saying much.

 

[HTC]

I don't care if the box is shaped in the form of a unicorn: what matters is what's inside.

That said, the box is actually quite ugly with those colors: perhaps with different coloring it could be more pleasing.

Still, unless it also includes a cooler, it's way too expensive for the extra performance it's supposed to provide (no reviews yet) and even then it depends on the quality of the cooler: if it's like old Intel stock coolers, it's nowhere near enough to justify the difference in price, IMO.

With the Threadripper 2 box, i still don't care about the box itself but, unlike with I9-9900K's approach, it's actually quite pleasing to the eye, IMHO.

 

[cucker tarlson]

Your posts make less sense each passing day, honestly

He's a very stable genius.

 

[moproblems99]

At most FPS gaming scenarios it will be darn near identical. I've used both. Not sure what that graph is smoking... but it's likely choosing a very particular intel biased situation. (and before you go "lol everything is" there ARE AMD biased situations too).

Who cares about the FPS when the vast majority of monitors in use are 60-75hz?

And where are folks who claimed “competition is guuuud! It will lower da prices!”?

Competition doesn't mean shit if people still buy based on brand and not needs.

 

[cucker tarlson]

Who cares about the FPS when the vast majority of monitors in use are 60-75hz?

You're coming into a 9900K discussion with a "most people play 60Hz" argument. silly.
Tell me,how many ryzen users actually need a 16 thread productivity cpu and how many just count thread per dollar ratio ? games use more threads, but people act as if single core performance was going away as a contributing factor. most of you need to learn the term equivalency. the fact that a game can spread the load across 16 threads does not mean it's equivalent to a fast hexacore at 70% load.

until prices for intel went nuts, AMD had nothing on 8600k, unless you needed 12/16 threads.

 

[moproblems99]

You're coming into a 9900K discussion with a "most people play 60Hz" argument. silly.
Tell me,how many ryzen users actually need a 16 thread productivity cpu and how many just count thread per dollar ratio ? games use more threads, but people act as if single core performance was going away as a contributing factor. most of you need to learn the term equivalency. the fact that a game can spread the load across 16 threads does not mean it's equivalent to a fast hexacore at 70% load.

until prices for intel went nuts, AMD had nothing on 8600k, unless you needed 12/16 threads.

Not sure what any of that has to do with anything. Thanks.

Edit: Just to recap, anyone buying a 9900k strictly for gaming is wasting their money but that is their prerogative. Therefore, someone buying a 9900k probably isn't running a 1440 or 1080 hi-refresh. So alas, they are probably running a monitor focused on color reproduction which means it is probably 60-75hz.